EANIE MEENIE (2025)

Written & Directed By: Shawn Simmons 

Cinematography: Tim Ives 

Editor: Chris Patterson and Dirk Westervelt

Cast: Samara Weaving, Karl Glusman, Andy Garcia, Steve Zahn, Marshawn Lynch, Jermaine Fowler, Mike O’Malley, Randall Park, Chris Bauer

A reformed teenage getaway driver is dragged back into her unsavory past when a former employer offers her a chance to save the life of her chronically unreliable ex-boyfriend.

————————————————————————

This film comes so close, but no cigar as it does play out like an Elmore Leonard story or novel. As it has the gritty details, the quirky characters and the down on their luck protagonist.

It also has a story that is set in the underworld of crime and a high story that doesn’t overreach and make it seem like this is the score of the century or will set everyone up for life but more just a simple heist that will help all involved get out of previous trouble and be financially lucrative .

Even though it is mainly a crime story, it does take its time to be a character piece for the main character played by Samara weaving and explain her character’s choices, upbringing, and mentality, which helps, especially when she is essentially in love with a screwup 

The film has a great cast, but that is the problem while the quirky supporting character shine. We don’t really ever get enough time with them to learn maybe how they tick or just to enjoy them in general. It’s longer than blink and you miss them, but still not quite enough 

Even Marshawn Lynch, who is usually comedic gold in movies here has the chance to create such an iconic character, and while he does, what is necessary, his impact isn’t felt the way that it should nor strong as it should. It feels here more like he scripted rather than where his strength is an improv. 

Samara weaving as the lead is more of the straight woman, whereas she surrounded by all these crazy quirky characters so she lies at the heart of the film, and obviously the protagonist were rooting for .

The film stays surprising throughout as well as engaging with a surprisingly strong and down, tried ending of sorts, though it feels like there’s something missing to push it quite over the top to passable. 

As it is a film, that is entertaining enough, but not quite not worthy to play with the others in its genre. It comes across his lightweight, even though it does have some heavy material. Maybe it’s just because of the story that it tells you want it to be stronger.

Even with it quirky characters it’s surprisingly violent and hard hitting, but it still doesn’t quite make it to Mark

As the film does have the juice and the ingredients and even the recipe, but the taste isn’t quite uproot or tastes fine but not quite special as you had hoped. No matter how it tries. 

Grade: C 

IF I HAD LEGS I’D KICK YOU (2025)

Written & Directed By: Mary Bronstein 

Cinematography: Christopher Messina 

Editor: Lucian Johnston

Cast: Rose Byrne, A$ap Rocky, Conan O’Brien, Ivy Wolk, Delaney Quinn, Danielle Macdonald, Christian Slater, Josh Pais, Ella Beatty, Mary Bronstein

While trying to manage her own life and career, a woman on the verge of a breakdown must cope with her daughter’s illness, an absent husband, a missing person, and an unusual relationship with her therapist.


This is dramatic, but present presented as a dark comedy

One can remember the first time I saw Rose Byrne in a film. It was in a disastrous epic movie Troy and I remember not being that impressed by her and it seems like since then if she had heard, she took it as a personal upfront because it seems like since then she has done nothing but build her career and impress in numerous performances that she sometimes gets credited with, but not enough in my view and here she gives an Oscar level performance think general Rowlands in a woman under the influence and her intensity

The film also has her character leading with all sorts of catastrophes that are making her breakdown and the camera seems to present most scenes, especially with her an extreme close-up, so you can never escape her intensity just as she seems to never be able to escape her ongoing problems and challenges

IT’S interesting that her character is a therapist as clearly she is breaking down and has her own therapist, and her job is to listen to other people‘s problems and give advice, but she can’t seem to solve her own as well as taking care of a disabled daughter and a husband who is not supportive truly, and never there

Randomly Conan O’Brien is in this movie, which is a welcome surprise, especially if you’re a fan of his though in a role that is quite different 

One of the wisest decisions is that her child is often in the scenes, but remains unseen, so while she has this illness, we never quite see her. She is kind of a phantom where we wonder what she looks like, but it might also be because it would be hard to find a child to give a physical and unbelievable performance for that character. While mostly throughout we are given fl glimpses of her. when eventually the child is revealed it is at a pivotal point. It seems as a must rather than play the character is almost invisible or imaginary.

Not sure that this film was produced by Josh Safdie, as it does feel like one of his films maybe not visually but with a main character going through increasing pressure and as the film goes on, they’re being an unrelenting tension that doesn’t seem to offer any distractions and the character coming more and more unhinged

Though the film is like the character at first, it seems a little light, a little more comedic and then as it goes along, it gets a little darker and has a little more pressure then by the end it just feels like there’s nowhere to go nowhere a turd and it doesn’t offer any answers or show that any character is a saint nor a villain they are just who they are in life. Is that way too there’s no definitive answer. There’s no let up Sometimes. It can be random.

It is surprising how much it has gripped you by the end and how much you care. Even as itnolays like an emotional horror film as it unfolds especially towards the end.

Grade: B+

FREAKIER FRIDAY (2025)

Directed By: Nisha Ganatra

Written By: Jordan Weiss 

Story By: Elyse Hollander and Jordan Weiss

Based on characters, Based on the book By: Mary Rodgers 

Cinematography: Matthew Clark

Editor: Eleanor Infante 

Cast: Jamie Lee Curtis, Lindsay Lohan, Julia Butters, Sophia Hammons, Vanessa Bayer, Mark Harmon, Manny Jacinto, Chad Michael Murray, Maitreyi Ramakrishnan, Christina Vidal

22 years after Tess and Anna endured an identity crisis, Anna now has a daughter and a soon-to-be stepdaughter. As they navigate the challenges that come when two families merge, Tess and Anna discover that lightning might strike twice.

————————————————————————-

This was unexpected a sequel, so many decades after the original hit though will admit kind of had interest to catch this can say that it’s not disappointing. It stays fun and lively throughout. It doesn’t offer necessarily anything original but it’s perfect for its target, offering fans of the original or more first a chance to see the two stars in their element who they grew up with, and it allows their children a chance to see characters their own age they can identify with.

Though I might not be the ideal audience, it reminded me of Disney adult aimed humored films where they still have an innocence, despite being more maturely themed

The film wisely stays with Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis‘s characters whose bodies are supposed to be inhabited by these teenagers and they get to major league showcase and be broad throughout whereas we do see the teenagers supposedly inhabited by older people, but the movie doesn’t rely on them as much.

It’s especially nice and surprising to see Lindsay Lohan back on the big screen and a major release making her comeback of sort. She has been making a comeback and more Hallmark and straight to streaming movies but here is the first time she’s had a chance on a major big screen platform. After so much trouble in her personal life it seemed like she was destined for tragedy or at least never really work again, which was a shame as always thought that she had the talent and goods to be a leading lady and have a long career so this film was a nice surprise.

Even though she doesn’t have as much to do or shine as in the last film, she still impresses, and it still quite the screen presence.

Jamie Lee Curtis is obviously having fun with her role here and gets a lot of time to shine and showcase and feel steadier here than in some of her more recent roles

Chad Michael Murray continues to be type cast as the hunk who gets away and kind of temptation that lays on the side, pure of fantasy, which leaves him with very little to do.

The film breezes along and mannequin to have and beat everything for each part of the audience. It can be romantic, comedic, young, mature, juvenile, and it manages to stay fun throughout, except when it goes from the second act of the third act with a plot device that of course is needed for a 3 act structure, but still has you rolling your eyes Kind of like getting a shot at the doctors office it’s needed and you know it’s coming, but the process is always a pain

Is the film is everything you expected to me, though? It also has charisma and charm. This is not going to went over anyone new to the franchise, but the fans of it will be in heaven as they bring back most of the cast from the first film and it feels like not your standard sequel. There was a lot of effort put it into this film That makes it feel like it goes above and beyond for its audience not a general audience again, but its audience.

Grade: C+

PICTURE THIS (2008)

Directed By: Stephen Herek

Written By: Temple Mathews 

Cinematography: Bernard Couture 

Editor: Robin Russell 

Cast: Ashely Tisdale, Robbie Amell, Lauren Collins, Kevin Pollack, Shenae Grimes, Cindy Busby, Marie-Marguerite Sabonqui, Angela Galuppo

Rich, handsome team captain Drew Patterson, the high school’s dream prince, like his elder brothers before, tires of the haughty head cheerleader and shows some interest in nerdy nobody Mandy Gilbert. For her, his invitation to the party of the year of his parental estate bodes instant social promotion, but her overprotective father Tom grounds her for dishonesty. She’s as determined to get in anyway with friends’ help as her rival’s pack to prevent that and dad to guard her. Furthermore, there’s a dooming rumor about the Patterson boys.

———————————————————————

Now let me start this review off by saying that,  I am obviously not the normal audience for this film as I am an adult male, so I am aged out when it comes to this film and this is definitely aimed at a more teenage audience, teenage female in particular, even though as the film plays, it even seems a little too soft and innocent for them. This is something I could more imagine, preteens or children, even watching as it would make more sense to them as it just has a innocence about it even the race scenes or subjects aren’t something you would worry about too much.

The film is a starring vehicle for Ashley Tisdale who is one of the stars of Disney’s high school the musical smash hit TV movie and it’s sequel now I’m not sure if they started as a Disney original or not though would place for that kind of audience. 

The film is rather basic paint by numbers you’ve seen this all before just with different Hijinx and little adventures that all seem to take place really within a few days, which is where some of the logical problems of the film come in whereas this the school hunk who dates it seems like the queen be most popular girl is telling this girl who has lead low on the social scale and never seem to really talk. all of a sudden he’s professing that he really likes her and that how special she is and really if this was true why did he wait for the last year of high school towards the end of the year before they graduate and B? Why doesn’t he just break up with his girlfriend first, so that there would be no hijinks but then again then there would be no movie.

To tell you the truth, the only reason I watch this is because two cast members from the grassy the teenage melodramatic soap opera that I am a big fan of were in it. Shanae Grimes and Lauren collins. Who played Tisdale‘s best friends and offer quirky, comedic, and loving support.

Ashley Tisdale does have star quality though this script and doesn’t really help her shine though she is watchable the film is acceptable even though the script or film might be too juvenile for even her core audience at the time. 

what are the major problems of this film? Is that her arrival? The queen bee who was the most popular girl in school? I don’t feel like would put so much attention to taking her down if she was really secure, but of course, since there’s a team movie at heart it shows that she’s insecure and not to mention the rival isn’t even a challenge when it comes to looks, she seems rather bleach, blonde and generic and way too old to be playing high school school student. Then again, so does the male elite who’s the dream guy Robbie Amell. But I digress.

luckily, the film never comes off as offensive, so it can easily play with most audiences and some might find its silliness cute and it is directed by journeyman director Stephen Herek. (BILL AND TED’S EXCELLENT ADVENTURE) So you have to give the film credit as at least it’s competently directed even if the material isn’t the greatest. i’m not really going to write this film only because it would be unfair as normally I might give it a low grade but again to a certain audience this might be the greatest thing ever made and if you’re watching it either you have kids or you’re watching it by accident or you’re really into these sort of films so it doesn’t really matter what I have to say.

Hopefully Ashley Tisdale returns to start them again, cause she definitely has the talent and the energy to truly be an effective actress full of personality

102 DALMATIONS (2000)

Directed By: Kevin Lima 

Written By: Kristen Buckley, Brian Regan, Bob Tzudiker and Noni White 

Story By: Kristen Buckley and Brian Regan

Based on the Novel “THE ONE HUNDRED AND ONE DALMATIONS” By: Dodie Smith 

Cinematography: Adrian Biddle and Roger Pratt

Editor: Gregory Perler 

Cast: Glenn Close, Gerard Depardieu, Ioan Gruffund, Alice Evans, Eric Idle, Tim McInnerny, Ian Richardson, Jim Carter, Ron Cook

After a spot of therapy, Cruella De Vil is released from prison a changed woman. Devoted to dogs and good causes, she is delighted that Chloe, her parole officer, has a dalmatian family and connections with a dog charity. But the sound of Big Ben can reverse the treatment so it is only a matter of time before Ms DeVille is back to her incredibly ghastly ways, using her new-found connections with Chloe and friends.

————————————————————————

One can remember  this trailer making the rounds in the year of its release and the trailer actually looked funny and captivating. It took me all this time to finally watch this film and say the trailer held more promise and humor. 

take this review with a pinch of salt as obviously if you like this film already, I’m not gonna change your mind and you’re just going to think that I am a hater and I will freely admit. This is not usually my type of film, but I was hoping it would be something fun and charming and it’s neither

it took me a while to watch this film. I remember when it came out and all the brew ha ha over 101 Dalmatians and then then making a sequel live action sequel with 102 Dalmatians and I decided to give the film a chance. 

Watching it clearly is not for me. This is a film, purely for children because it’s silly joyful with a little hint of darkness, but I’d rather feels like a straight to Dvd home video TV type of production as it just seems kind of cheap and unmemorable and there are a bunch of gags, but they don’t really seem to work. 

The only good thing or promising aspect of this film is Glenn Close reprising her role as Cruella Deville and she’s fun and campy is all hell but also the weakness of the film is that it More keeps her as a supporting character.

whereas we focus on the characters played by Ioan Gruffund and Alice Evans. Who don’t even feel like real characters they feel like plat points and they’re truly is no fun when most of the movie is centered around them and the dogs as they have no chemistry and they’re not even that interesting as characters so while the film does have the basic requirements and trying to pretty much do the same thing as a 101 Dalmatians only now with Cruella supposedly being rehab and liking dogs and then halfway through the film, the rehab doesn’t work or backfires and having her go back, this is just the first film all over again with less star filled Cast.

One might be a particularly disappointed because this film is directed by Kevin Lima, who also directed A GOOFY MOVIE which was animated in which I love so I thought that he would be able to handle a live action film with the same care and touch and while it’s a film, that children will obviously adore it lacks any real nuance or any real fun so personally for me, and that just adds to the disappointment of the whole endeavor. As he has shown, he can offer up emotional yet funny material for an audience of all ages and here, even though it might be a little more skewed it’s very hard to believe that even the audience it’s aimed that will find this enjoyable or unforgettable. Then again he can only work with what he has in the script, even if Glenn Clouse shines above it all.

Though you usually know you are in trouble when a film introduces a talking animal for its comedic relief, but also shows who this film was more made for. 

So that the rest of the film feels silly familiar and just tired. It just feels like no one really had any new ideas or really any passion for this film and and it ended up just being more of the same only with lower production values and again Glenn Close is clearly having fun and truly earning her paycheck as the over the top supporting villain, but she is the only thing of note in this otherwise forgettable film.

At least the fashions through out are ridiculously over the top and leaves some room For campy humor. 

Grade: D

CHRISTMAS EVE IN MILLER’S POINT (2024)

Directed by: Tyler Taormina

Written By: Tyler Taormina and Eric Berger

Story Editor/Editor: Kevin Anton

Cinematography: Carson Lund

Cast: Matilda Fleming, Maria Dizzia, Ben Shenkman, Francesca Scorsese, Elsie Fisher, Michael Cera, Gregg Turkington, Tony Savino, Steven Alleva, Grege Morris, Sawyer Spielberg

On Christmas Eve, a family gathers for what could be the last holiday in their ancestral home. As the night wears on and generational tensions arise, one of the teenagers sneaks out with her friends to claim the wintry suburb for her own.

————————————————————————-

this film is the epitome of an ensemble film as there are no real stars. Every character plays their role essentially in each other stories, and there is no real complete story as everything is told more and snippets and scenes, but never quite from beginning to end in a complete way. 

As the film is largely plotless, but plays out over a families holiday traditions, and party as they all get together where many individual things happen some smaller some greater but nothing really happens except for this celebration.

it seems like the filmmaker wanted some more evoke, the emotions of the holiday or any holiday gathering with your family where the story is told purely at this celebration where you get updates about their lives away from one another, always wanting to showcase the best and you get a sense of the family history and their relationships with one another, but nothing is ever clearly defined 

The drama that happens as well as the comedy is more lived in and isn’t as random as everyone knows each other and because they know each other and their habits nothing is quite shocking to one another. 

The film works and its own artistry that might be frustrating to some members of the audience as it takes its time telling the story it wants to, but again the story is never told in a complete way it’s more told segments that seem like they go nowhere endless that more evoke moods as there is an inherent sadness throughout as they adults are realizing they’re getting older and how much they have in the past but also the ones who raise them are slowly deteriorating and they want to take care of them. It might be too much for them to take on

And that would also celebrates the happiness of seeing long lost family members who you grew up with who now other than these types of get together rarely ever see as those family members you never really want to see, but are forced to and have to play nice with 

The tons of cuisine and food that you can board yourself on and share with family 

As well as issues that certain family members have with one another that everyone seems to know about, but either or not acknowledged or not talked about, but clearly seen and felt 

there is a section of the film where it more focuses on the younger characters the teenagers and their wild night out though even though there’s more adventure and the film seems to have a little more energy and spirit to match the characters. It also is more told in segments whereas anytime the film comes close to anything happening, especially any kind of action or excitement it seems like it cuts to something else or another character and then we see the aftermath of the action.

As even the biggest names in the cast, who is also a producer, Michael cera barely has any lines and isn’t in much of the movie nor anal part of it, but is appearance does add a certain prestige into the film

this is a film that might be challenging for some and truly you’re either going to get into its wavelength or not.

Though as an audience member one cannot say they were totally down with everything about the film. I applaud it for its artistic choices and the mood and can identify with the material as the film presents highs and Lows joys and defeats, but isn’t meant to leave the audience depressed, but also isn’t the typical holiday movie where it’s all smiles and happiness for the audience, though the film does end with a lot of smiles for the characters.

Grade: B-

OUR LITTLE SECRET (2024)

Directed By: Stephen Herek

Written By: Hailey DeDominicis

Cinematography: Graham Robbins 

Editor: Heath Ryan 

Cast: Lindsay Lohan, Ian Harding, Joe Rudnitsky, Kristen Chenowith, Tim Meadows, Judy Reyes, Katie Baker, Dan Bucatinsky, Ash Santos, Henry Czerny, Chris Parnell, Kurt Yue 

Avery and Logan haven’t spoken in the 10 years since they broke up. As Christmas approaches, they discover that their new partners are siblings, and both of them have been invited to stay with the family for the holidays. Avery proposes that they keep their past a secret to avoid any awkward confrontations, but hiding the truth turns out to be more difficult than it seems–and spending time together reignites old sparks.

————————————————————————

The film Has the screwball comedy concept down. 

In veteran director Stephen Herek’s hands makes what could have easily been insufferable into something more memorable. Very formulaic 

It get’s a bit racy but never over the edge and stays quite clean. Though goes a few places you wouldn’t expect, but keeps its subjects and targets soft. After all it is a movie aimed at the holidays for families for the most part. 

I will admit I watched this movie mainly to see actress Lindsay Lohan. I was a fan when I was younger and was alway rooting for her through her turmoil with fame, but always thought she was talented and had the skills. Making quite the comeback here. Though not as full fledged as one would hope. Though she is trying and sells the material.

So looked forward to her many comebacks. Luckily they have recently seemed to stick, but mostly here does what is required. She comes across a bit stiff and too poised. Especially when she needs to throw herself into it more. 

The film Is filled  with reliable recognizable and reliable actors who the audience  will instantly recognize. 

It’s a Sweet romantic comedy that is a bornvoer the top yet relatable. As most of the characters throughout are holding secrets. None that small they are all quite devastating in the end. 

Which at least leaves the movie with some gravity. As most of the other gags seem forgettable and never quite Go for  the full damage or gambit of consequences, but still Manages to leave a smile on your face. 

Grade: C+

SILENT NIGHT (2021)

Written & Directed By: Camille Griffin

Cinematography: Sam Renton 

Editor: Pia Di Ciaula and Martin Walsh 

Cast: Keira Knightley, Matthew Goode, Roman Griffin Davis, Sope Dirisu, Kirby Howell-Baptiste, Lucy Punch, Annabelle Wallis, Lily-Rose Depp, Rufus Jones, Davida McKenzie

Nell, Simon, and their 3 sons are ready to welcome friends and family for what promises to be a perfect Christmas gathering. Perfect except for one thing: everyone is going to die.

————————————————————————

This is a film. You should know as a little about before you watch it and let yourself be surprised by it that way it can be rewarding for you.

This is a dark comedy with a surprise ending that you don’t necessarily see coming, especially with this material. Which can be subtle but does leave a sting.

As a perfectly mixes, the joy and melancholy of the holidays. As a time of joy camaraderie, but also a time of darkness, especially if not feeling that particular joy and still feel a certain loneliness or emptiness

The film starts off at typical if not cynical, though eventually you find out the downside or tragedy of what brings all the characters together. Even though there are at the beginning.

We get to see the characters go through the emotions as it dawns on them what is coming and have to face their own mortality and their past. The film surprisingly has them talking about each other, but never becoming vicious or revealing secrets that would normally tear them apart, which would direct the film into a more territory. it to be point and somewhat realistic.

The drama of it all gets to you in the audience that has its fair share of humor that comes more naturally as some secrets are revealed.

What is that? The film isn’t reliant on one thing it’s the mixture of elements that works. The same way with the cast it’s an ensemble no real stars, though wish some of the cast members or other characters had more to do than what they are given here mainly Kirby Howell-Baptiste.

This is a film, where the melancholy hangs in the air no matter how light some scenes or the atmosphere might be.

When the heart is introduced, it gets dark and all the more real thou it is a release of the underlying tension that the film has been building up.

Soon as you see  Roman Griffin Davis in this film, you should know it’s a tragedy or whoever is playing his mother won’t survive. So far his career highlights have been this and JOJO RABBITT. so usually a quirky dark comedy. Though he is also the film’s director’s son 

Ultimately, the film has a climate change message and is very subtle with its theme and provocations. Especially when it comes to science and the government also the establish class and youth culture.. 

I’m surprised this film is more popular as it is a gem 

Grade: B

EDDINGTON (2025)

 

Written & Directed By: Ari Aster

Cinematography: Darius Khondji

Editor: Lucian Johnston 

Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Emma Stone, Austin Butler, Pedro Pascal, Deidre O’Connell, Michael Ward, Cameron Mann, Clifton Collins Jr., Luke Grimes, William Belleau, Amelie Hoeferle 

In May of 2020, a standoff between a small-town sheriff and mayor sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in Eddington, New Mexico.

————————————————————————

This film Is A Modern Western Fever Dream America Desperately Needs to Talk About

Eddington is one of those films that walks into the cultural conversation like it owns the place. It’s loud, strange, earnest, paranoid, poetic—and you immediately know you’ll be arguing about it for months. It’s a genuine conversation starter, which is why I will gently advise: go in knowing as little as possible.

That said… one has have to talk about it, and talking about it requires spoilers. So consider this your warning, your permission slip, and your parachute.

This is a film that is hard to describe or even evaluate on one review. There are so Many things going o. Where even the littlest action, decision or even detail means more by the ends 

This is a movie that is, by design, divisive. A cinematic Rorschach test. Some viewers will love it. Some will hate it. Some will think they “get” it. Some will swear others don’t “get” it. And others still will simply sit there wondering why the film dared to poke at politics, identity, and American mythmaking with a stick this sharp and this reckless.

But that’s also the point: Eddington isn’t here to soothe you. As it’s a midwest tapestry stitched with paranoia.

Set in a small Midwestern town, the film plays like a modern western that swaps out the black-hatted outlaw for pandemic panic, online conspiracy, fractured identity politics, and the creeping realization that the “outside world” has already invaded long before anyone notices.

The first half feels deceptively simple. small tensions, personal feuds, social anxietie, but those threads keep tightening, knotting, and snapping until the town erupts, not because of a single villain, but because absolutely everyone is too wrapped up in their own drama to actually talk to each other.

It’s a portrait of America where communication has been replaced with suspicion. Where rivalries escalate past all reason. Where every person is starring in their own private conspiracy thriller. Even as the real threats crawl right through the cracks.

By the end, the film begins to resemble a Donald-Trump-era conspiracy fantasy… but with absolutely none of the idol worship or flattery. It’s the nightmare version: the idea that paranoia itself becomes prophecy. That fear becomes religion. That enemies, real or imagined materialize because characters are too busy reenacting their own ideological theater to notice the world burning around them.

The satire bites hard, aiming squarely at both political sides. The left -idealistic, moralizing, eager to be on “the right side of history” treats the town’s homeless man like an inconvenience. The right – fearful, defensive, easily provoked, treats him like a problem to eliminate. And everyone, absolutely everyone, is a hypocrite.

Young “progressive” locals demand justice yet lecture the Black deputy on what he should feel, while he’s simply trying to do his job and survive in a town that barely allows upward mobility. Romantic tensions reveal that personal motives are often far murkier than the ideologies people hide behind. Friendships fracture. Morals bend depending on who’s watching. It makes you wonder if the characters truly feel this or if it’s just performative social justice because that is the trend and what’s popular. Also giving them a sense of rebellion that youth seems to always desire against the aged or old ways. 

By the end the deputy has his own scars and learns the lessons his ancestors had to deal with and learn. Yet still go on day to day in pain. Never being able to forget the injustices. 

The virus infiltrates. Fear infiltrates. Antifa is said to infiltrate. But really, it’s paranoia doing all the infiltrating.

Yes, this is very much an Ari Aster film, though it’s looser, less mannered, and more sprawling than Midsommar or Beau Is Afraid. It’s a messy beauty, intentionally so. The visuals are gorgeous but less overtly stylized; the tone more erratic, more chaotic, more human. It’s a modern western of moral collapse 

If Beau Is Afraid punished its lead for everything, Eddington punishes its lead for exactly one thing: believing revenge is righteousness.

And his downward spiral, though tragic, is compelling in a mythic, moral-fable way.

The third act is where Aster lights the fuse and lets the whole film detonate.

Chaos reigns. Consequences catch up. Characters pay the ultimate price. not for their politics, but for their blindness.

Eddington refuses to pick a side because it’s too busy examining how people weaponize sides in the first place. It understands that humans are more complicated than the slogans they carry or the propaganda they share. Ideology becomes performance. Performance becomes identity. Identity becomes a trap.

And through all this, the film insists that sometimes the greatest horror story is simply a group of people refusing to truly see one another.

So that the film is about flawed people, not slogans 

Is the film perfect? No. Is it Ari Aster’s best? No 

But Is it vital? Absolutely. It’s ambitious, jagged, clunky in spots, occasionally too big for its own frame, but it’s also alive—full of ideas, full of danger, full of that rare cinematic bravery that demands viewers think rather than simply consume.

The major supporting actors. Some of the film’s biggest names. Emma Stone, Austin Butler, Pedro Pascal all appear briefly but meaningfully, flashing like caution signs in the town’s slow-motion meltdown. Their presence reinforces how everyone is part of the problem, part of the confusion, part of the noise.

Joaquin Phoenix’s acting here is more internal than external and it’s his show the ringleader to reign in. Even if by the end he is one of the acts rather then being in control. Especially the way he wants or hopes he is. 

I could try to link the various theories and interpretations that this film presents but that is for the viewer to discover for themselves and read into,  no I’m not writing that to say that I don’t

Have any or see any. I think half the interest and entertainment isn’t Always what is happening on the screen but how you or an audience reacts to it. 

I can see why some might dislike the film

Though most admit they don’t like the film but It’s 

Not a bad film as it does make you think. As it tries to be a satire that is less comedic and more political exposing the chaos of the pandemic playing out all the theories, fears and politics in a small town and making it come across as a modern western due to it’s Location and strange mix of morals and anti-hero To show that we are all flawed in some way

As when the lead does what he thinks is right out of revenge but leads to his own and others downfall that ends up with him being heroic and paying the ultimate price 

The films shows flaws I. Both sides as it is more interested in showing characters and how they can be lead astray but also victims of circumstance and survival at times 

Who are we to hate because things don’t

go the way they are supposed to or are expected to. People are people not slogans and propaganda that they might brandish or share and at the heart of all these movements the leaders are open to oversight and more interested in the message and less the followers or even supposed victims 

This is not a pass/fail film. It’s a what did this make you feel? film. A what did you see that I missed?film.

The entertainment isn’t just the plot. it’s the audience reaction, the interpretations, the debates in the parking lot afterward.

Eddington is a human horror story disguised as a political satire disguised as a western disguised as a pandemic drama.

It’s a film about how easily we fracture under pressure, how quickly we fall into narrative traps, and how dangerous it is when no one is listening.

Not my favorite Aster film… but maybe the one most urgently worth discussing.

Grade: B+

LADY KILLER (1933)

Directed By: Roy Del Ruth

Written By: Ben Markson and Lilie Hayward

Based on the story “The Finger Man” By: Rosalind Keating Shaffer 

Cinematography: Tony Gaudio

Editor: George Amy 

Cast: James Cagney, Mae Clarke, Margaret Lindsay, Leslie Fenton, Douglas Dumbrille, Russell Hopton, Raymond Hatton, Henry O’Neill 

When a movie theater usher is fired, he takes up with criminals and finds himself quite adept at various illegal activities. Eventually though, the police catch up with him, and he runs to hide out in Los Angeles. There he stumbles into the movie business and soon rises to stardom. He has gone straight, but his newfound success arouses the interest of his old criminal associates, who are not above blackmail.

————————————————————————

The films of James Cagney’s work that I see, he is swiftly becoming one of my favorite actors of all time.

As he has a screen presence personality, and tons of range and while this film, is it quite one of his memorable ones.  it’s still an interesting entry in his résumé and one can see why he starred in it.

The film is pre-code Hollywood where anything goes. 

As the first half definitely works and it’s fun, funny and seems to move quite long at a quick pace that stays charming. Though once the second half of the film starts where he has to relocate and go to Hollywood and we see him work his way up the ladder. In various roles for the studio.

Where this part of the film is where the romance starts, it also allows us to see him in various costumes and roles that come off more comedic, and are truly a time capsule of old Hollywood for those fanatics which shows how they would dress up extras as Native Americans and westerns and the special effects that they would use

It also allows us for a good part of the film to see James Cagney with a hideous thin mustache. Now once his life has seemed to have settled his old cronies and business partners from his passing to hunt him down and find him and while this should be thrilling this is actually What brings the film down as it’s not as fun or inventive as the rest of the film and really makes the film dragged towards the end and this film is under 90 minutes already

One quality that is notable is the viciousness in which he treats one of his old female compatriots and seemingly ex lover when he throws her out he’s just so outrageously violent towards her that it almost feels comical, which seems to be what the film is going for but watching it it feels over-the-top and cruel, no matter what happened in their past. I’m talking Tyler Perry melodramatic over the top.

The film is a crime keeper comedy and does whisk along rather quick, but truly James Cagney is the only reason to watch this film. He is the star and truly is one in this film. While the rest of the cast is good enough but not all that memorable 

James Cagney said in interviews it’s not one of his finest. In fact, I had never heard of it until it came up on a streaming service and decided to give it a chance.

So for this one I say watch at your own risk, but if you’re a James Cagney fan, I think it’s enjoyable

GRADE: C