SCREAM 7 (2026)

Directed By: Kevin Williamson

Written By: Kevin Williamson and Guy Busick

Story By: James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick 

Cinematography: Ramsey Nickell

Editor: Jim Page

Cast: Neve Campbell, Courtney Cox, Isabel May, Jasmin Savoy Brown, Mason Gooding, Joel Michael, Anna Camp, McKenna Grace, Ethan Embry, Celeste O’Connor, Jimmy Tatro 

Sidney Prescott has built a quiet life in Pine Grove, Indiana, running a coffeehouse with her husband, Mark, and raising their teenage daughter, Tatum. That fragile peace shatters when a new Ghostface begins targeting Tatum and her friends, first attacking during a school theater rehearsal and then turning the family’s home and Sidney’s business into killing grounds. The threat becomes more personal when Ghostface contacts Sidney through video calls, appearing as an aged and scarred Stu Macher. As Sidney tries to protect Tatum, the attacks spread through the town, forcing her to confront the possibility that Stu survived and that someone is using her traumatic past to manipulate her family. With Gale Weathers, Chad Meeks-Martin, and Mindy Meeks-Martin drawn into the crisis, Sidney must uncover the killer’s identity before Tatum becomes the next chapter in her mother’s history of violence.


Spoilers ahead! If you haven’t seen Scream 7, I wouldn’t recommend reading this review. Then again, after watching the movie, you might wish somebody had warned you about that, too.

First things first: I love the original Scream. I like Scream 2, too. And for whatever reason, I’ve generally found myself enjoying the even-numbered entries in this franchise more than the odd ones. Honestly, they could have ended things with Scream 4, which I think more than makes up for the shortcomings of Scream 3.

At some point, I would have liked to imagine Sidney Prescott finally getting to live a normal adult life. You know, maybe raise a family, enjoy a quiet afternoon, and go grocery shopping without having to worry about some masked lunatic turning her errands into a crime scene.

But money talks, bullshit walks, and apparently, Ghostface never retires. So the franchise kept going, and I kept showing up.

Unfortunately, the plans for another trilogy centered on Melissa Barrera’s character fell apart after Barrera was fired following her public comments about Palestine. Jenna Ortega subsequently exited, and director Christopher Landon also departed the project. With the original plans in disarray, the franchise returned to Neve Campbell’s Sidney Prescott, bringing her back into the spotlight after the salary dispute that kept her out of Scream VI.

I wasn’t particularly interested in paying to see Scream 7 in theaters, but I was curious enough to check it out once it became available on streaming. 

This is a pale imitation of the movies that came before it. For a franchise that once felt clever, personal, and genuinely interested in playing games with its audience, this installment feels strangely disposable. It could have been any modern slasher or mystery horror movie, just with the SCREAM name slapped on the poster.

What makes that especially disappointing is the involvement of Kevin Williamson, the man who wrote the original Scream and helped establish what made this franchise so special in the first place.

You would think that having the guy who helped create the magic back in the director’s chair would be a good thing. Instead, the movie feels like a reminder that knowing the ingredients to a successful recipe doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll make a good meal.

Perhaps the last-minute changes and rewrites are partly to blame. Whatever the reason, the movie never feels as though it has much of a personal identity. It feels like a franchise trying to keep itself alive rather than a story that genuinely needs to be told. And that’s a shame, because there was a time when Scream felt like it had something to say.

One of my biggest problems is that the movie seems to think more gore automatically means more impact.

There’s certainly plenty of blood, guts, and gruesome business to go around. Apparently, every victim needs a mandatory serving of extra violence before they’re allowed to leave the movie.

The problem is that you barely get to know most of these people. They become little more than targets waiting to be crossed off the list. When somebody dies, you’re less likely to feel sad than to wonder whether they were the killer, a red herring, or simply another body to decorate the floor.

I find it ironic that when the original SCREAM came out, the filmmakers had to cut back on Drew Barrymore’s opening death to secure the R rating. Here, the gore is practically flying everywhere. We’ve certainly come a long way from the days when a little blood was enough to get the ratings board reaching for its scissors.

And while I can give the film some credit for its willingness to get nasty, there’s a difference between being shocking and simply being excessive. 

There’s also a particularly uncomfortable death involving a teenage Black girl that feels unnecessarily brutal. The violence is already clear, and the extra punishment adds nothing meaningful to the scene. It comes across less as effective horror than gratuitous overkill. And speaking of overkill, the movie has another annoying habit: refusing to let certain deaths remain deaths.

Characters who appear to have been killed turn out to be alive, sometimes after what should have been fatal encounters. The film wants to be coldhearted, but then seems to get nervous about following through.  You can’t have it both ways. If you’re going to play rough, at least commit to the game.

I understand Sidney wanting to protect her daughter from the horrors of her past. That’s a perfectly reasonable instinct for a mother.

But considering that Ghostface has repeatedly turned Sidney’s life into a never-ending episode of Who Wants to Be Murdered Next?, you would think she’d have given her daughter a little more information about the danger she might face.

There’s a difference between shielding a child and leaving them completely unprepared for a family history that practically comes with its own true-crime documentary series.

Still, one of the film’s better aspects is Sidney herself. Neve Campbell remains the heart of this franchise, and it’s nice to see her back on the big screen.

I appreciate that Sidney isn’t reduced to a shrieking victim waiting for somebody else to save her. She fights back, takes action, and tries to teach her daughter how to defend herself. That’s the Sidney Prescott I remember: a survivor who refuses to go down without a fight. But even that comes with a bittersweet feeling. How many times does this woman have to do this? At what point does she get to enjoy the life she’s fought so hard to preserve?

I know horror franchises thrive on bringing their survivors back for another round. But I would have liked to see Sidney get something resembling a happy ending. Maybe a peaceful family dinner. A vacation. A few years without a phone call from somebody wearing a Halloween costume and carrying a knife. Is that really too much to ask?

Mason Gooding and Jasmin Savoy Brown are the other returning cast members from the newer generation, and at this point, they feel like the franchise’s attempt to create another Dewey.

The difference is that Dewey generally had a stronger purpose in the story. Here, these characters sometimes feel like human pincushions, repeatedly getting attacked, somehow surviving, and then wandering right back into danger.

You’d think after everything they’ve experienced, they’d have considered moving somewhere with better security and fewer suspicious phone calls.

But they’re among the few links to the previous installments, so their presence at least gives longtime fans something familiar to hold on to.

Unfortunately, familiarity is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

When the killers are finally revealed, the whole thing feels less like a clever mystery and more like an episode of SCOOBY-DOO. You can practically hear somebody pulling off a mask and announcing that they would have gotten away with it if it weren’t for those meddling survivors.

The motivations are even more disappointing. Previous SCREAM movies understood that the killer’s identity was only half the fun. The motive needed to add something to the story, whether it was a commentary on fame, fandom, revenge, or the horror industry’s obsession with recycling itself.

Here, the explanations feel weak, impersonal, and downright silly. The reveal doesn’t make you reconsider what you’ve watched. It makes you wonder why you spent so much time trying to solve the mystery in the first place.

Even one of the killers feels so inconsequential for much of the movie that their eventual involvement in the big reveal barely registers.And the opening sequence, which should be one of the franchise’s signature moments, isn’t particularly effective either. It tries to make you suspect that the killings might be connected to one of the characters we’re meant to question, but the setup ultimately feels like much ado about nothing.

The opening victims may be recognizable to a few particularly devoted film fans, but they don’t have quite the star power or cultural recognition that might make their deaths especially memorable.

There’s nothing wrong with the actors themselves. The problem is that the sequence never quite achieves the impact of the franchise’s best opening scenes.

The movie does deserve a little credit for finding a way to bring back familiar faces from the past, much as the previous installments kept finding ways to incorporate Billy Loomis. It’s a fun idea in principle, but there are only so many times you can revisit the same tricks before they stop feeling inventive.

It’s not all bad news. There are very few savi g graces 

Gale Weathers gets a memorable entrance, and it’s refreshing to see her make it through the movie without getting repeatedly beaten, stabbed, or otherwise treated like a punching bag. For once, she seems to have figured out that self-preservation is a perfectly respectable career choice. And Neve Campbell is still a welcome presence. There’s something comforting about seeing her return to the role that helped define the franchise. She brings a familiarity and strength that the film desperately needs.

The gore is another point in its favor if that’s what you’re looking for. There’s an undeniable enthusiasm for practical nastiness, even if the movie occasionally mistakes excess for effectiveness. But these are small victories in a film that never quite comes together.

What’s especially strange is that this installment comes from Kevin Williamson, whose original screenplay helped make SCREAM, such a refreshing horror movie in the first place. Perhaps this is a case of the material needing a different perspective, or perhaps the franchise has simply run out of fresh ideas to say about itself.

I still like certain aspects of SCREAM 3, despite its flaws, because at least it felt as though it was trying something different. Its Hollywood setting and comedic elements gave it a distinct identity, while its commentary on the movie business and the people who control it offered more to chew on than simply guessing who was behind the mask. In retrospect, the film’s satire of Hollywood’s abuse of power also takes on an uglier dimension. which also seemed to be taking shots at DIMENSION FILMS and Harvey Weinstein in particular. 

SCREAM 7, by comparison, feels like a repeat performance in a different town, with fewer interesting things to say.

What makes this disappointing isn’t simply that it’s a bad sequel. Bad sequels are practically a horror tradition. It’s that SCREAM was once a franchise that made you feel as though you were in on the joke.

It understood horror movies, their clichés, their audiences, and the people who loved them. It could be funny without becoming silly, violent without losing its personality, and self-aware without making you feel as though the filmmakers were congratulating themselves for being clever.

The original movie helped make horror feel exciting again. It was sharp, entertaining, and genuinely surprising. It’s a movie that helped me

To take a greater Interest In horror films. Even when the sequels stumbled, there was usually something to appreciate, whether it was a new setting, an interesting idea, or another memorable performance from the returning cast.

With SCREAM 7, I mostly felt the absence of any of that 

It feels like filler masquerading as a full-fledged sequel, a movie that exists because the franchise is still profitable rather than because anyone has a particularly compelling story to tell. And given how much money these films can make, I doubt Ghostface will be hanging up the mask anytime soon. Another sequel seems inevitable, even if we don’t know when it’ll arrive.

If that happens, I hope the filmmakers take a step back and figure out what makes this series worth revisiting. Give us characters worth caring about, a mystery worth solving, a motive worth remembering, and something to say beyond the fact that people keep getting murdered.

For longtime fans, SCREAM 7 might be worth watching just to complete the collection. It’s nice to see Neve Campbell again, and there are a few moments that remind you why this franchise mattered in the first place.

But for me, this is one of the least memorable entries in the series, right down there with SCREAM 3, though that film at least had a personality of its own.

I wouldn’t recommend it as a starting point for new horror fans, either. It’s the seventh movie in a franchise, after all. There are better places to begin, including the very film that made all of this possible.

Ultimately, the saddest thing about SCREAM 7 is that it leaves me feeling less excited about the next installment than nostalgic for the first one.

I remember when seeing a new SCREAM meant looking forward to a clever new mystery, memorable characters, and the possibility that the franchise might surprise me all over again.

I wouldn’t be upset if this was the last in the franchise and they finally let it rest in peace but then again I said the same thing at the end of three and the force one ended up being spectaculat so We’ll see.

Grade: C- 

V/H/S/MIXTAPE (2026)

Directed By: Ernest Dickerson (THE MUSIC OF MR. SZE) Rza (DEATH TONE) Flying Lotus (ANOTHER CABIN) David Moreau (HEART BEAT) Renee Zahn (DANCE DANCE DANCE) Tobias Forge (PREMATURE BURIAL)

Written By: Rza And Matt Landsman (DEATH TONE) Zoe Cooper (DANCE DANCE DANCE) 

Ernest Dickerson (THE MUSIC OF MR. SZE) Flying Lotus (ANOTHER CABIN) Tobias Forge (PREMATURE BURIAL) David Moreau (HEART BEAT) 

Story By: Renee Zahn (DANCE DANCE DANCE)

Cinematography: Crille Forsberg (PREMATURE BURIAL) Sean McDaniel (DEATH TONE) Patrick Murguia (THE MUSIC OF MR. SZE) Kevin Stewart (DANCE DANCE DANCE)

Editor: Brad Basser (DEATH TONE) Emil Klinta (PREMATURE BURIAL) Thom Newell (DANCE DANCE DANCE) 

Cast: Barbara Crampton, Alex Hsu, Neela Jolene, Maise De Krassel, Jihad Brent, Josh Willis, Nour El Refai, Gustaf Hammerstein

It presents a new anthology in which music and sound become a source of terror.


This franchise has always been a mixed bag. The first two films in the franchise were probably the most successful and coherent. As well as staying on theme, as each feature is an anthology, that usually comes out every Halloween, but usually have a general theme. This films theme is music most of the stories or short films all revolved around music as well as it seeming like the linking connection is having the band war kind of host these films rather than really helping to link them all together, however closely. As this more plays like a promo for them. So it comes off as a movie special specifically chosen by them. With little rhyme or reason 

This isn’t the first of these film films that it felt like a struggle to sit through but here this one really tested my patience

That was typical at first only one or two of these short films is actually worth watching in any of the time and effort. As none of the films are really noteworthy and most are pretty predictable. As most of the shorts are kind of disposable. 

The first short DANCE DANCE DANCE by Renee Zahn is truly the only memorable one. As it comes across as the most vicious ADULT SWIM type horror short. That reminds one of the work of Director Casper Kelley, who actually directed a segment from the VHS compilation horror film. 

The second segment ANOTHER CABIN is an animated short directed and scored by FLYING LOTUS that plays so quick it barely registers before it is over and feels like it’s missing an ending. 

The Third Segment HEARTBEAT directed by David Moreau is certainly vividly shot and styled, but by the end of the film. I almost forgot about this segment entirely. It’s ok, but far from memorable of that impressive. 

The Fourth Segment THE MUSIC OF MR. SZE is the longest one and feels like an over-the-top TALES FROM THE CRYPT episode and not one of the good ones. It’s told mostly from POV and is the one that feels the most predictable, but at least it’s coherent and watchable. Directed By: Ernest Dickerson

The 5th short PREMATURE BURIAL by Tomas Forge is more a music video short seemed like it was just more graphic than the usual music videos. As he seems to be part of this band again this more feel an opportunity to showcase his band. C

The 6th & final segment DEATH TONE directed by THE RZA is at least a little fun. Even if it is ridiculous and feels a bit inspired. Even if it endsbip playing kind of basic. C+

I am still a fan of the franchise is as much of if they make another one, will be interested but maybe they need to hold off a bit and get inspired or new directors looking to make their shot or take some random short films from up and comers on the film festival circuit. Put them under the blanket of the franchise and find a way to link them. 

it’s a shame as this seems to be the first in the anthology that has more Africa, American talent in front of the screen, as well as behind the scenes. 

Grade:

DANCE DANCE DANCE – C+

ANOTHER CABIN – D

HEARTBEAT – C – 

THE MUSIC OF MR. SZE – C

PREMATURE BURIAL – C-

DEATH TONE – C+

 (OVERALL) D 

PENNY LANE IS DEAD (2026)

Written & Directed By: Mia Kate Russell

Cinematography: Liam Gilmour

Editor: Dan Lee 

Cast: Tahlee Fereday, Sophia Wright-Mendelsohn, Alexandra Jensen, Bailey Spalding, Fletcher Humphreys, Steve Le Marquand, Ben O’Toole, Matthew O’Sullivan 

A quiet Australian beach house celebration turns into a nightmare when an uninvited cousin and three violent intruders take over the secluded property.


This is definitely a disturbing film. That’s not gonna be for everybody think of this more as a kind of 1970s grindhouse type of film only set more in the 1980s. It has a punk rock energy and highly spirited. Though is a horror to sit through. 

which makes someone wonder if so, many films are set in time periods before cell phones are more for plot narratives that might ask why didn’t they just use some kind of modern technology and the filmmaker is not wanting to cop out and say no signal then necessarily an aesthetic story choice or wanting to be nostalgic

As you sit through the foul and have to watch the innocence get taken advantage of by this gang of villains. It’s like watching someone picking off kittens. Strangely enough, the most evil is the title character’s cousin played by Sophia Wright-Mendelsohn, who initiates all of this and still feels like she is vindicated throughout.

As she sees herself only as a victim in that everything that is happening to everyone else they deserve it. As she is delusional, sociopathic, and a psychopath and the booze and drugs certainly don’t help. She comes across even worse than the male villains that she encourages, and who mostly do all of the dirty work.

The film feels like torture porn to a certain extent as we know where it is going and gets Satur as it goes along so that when finally someone is successful in fighting back, those are the glimmers of hope but and fighting back they have to release just as much merciless violence

The film is entertaining, but one can’t exactly support it subject matter thoroughly. It’s a small story that you feel trapped in.

it’s understandable how this film might be in bad taste for certain audience members. It will certainly be problematic to some. 

though strangely, the film is violent though luckily never shows the violence against the females physically or in too much graphically. Except when fighting one another. Though we do see the aftermath and can still hear the assault, which makes it a bit worse but accelerates our heat of the villains.

This is a film. You know what you were getting into pretty much after the first 20 minutes so if you like gritty revenge films, this is for you.

As it whips, you went into a frenzy, but little by little gives you what you want until you are practically blood thirsty. 

The film does offer some nice little tweaks, including the ending, which is questionable but works. It doesn’t feel exactly deserved, but it’s the closest this film gets to being positive. 

Grade: B+

FIND YOUR FRIENDS (2025)

Written & Directed By: Israel Pakzad

Cinematography: Tim Curtin 

Editor: Maxine Pozzi-Garcia 

Cast: Helena Howard, Zion Moreno, Bella Throne, Sophia Ali, Chloe Cherry, Chris Bauer, Jake Manley, Israel Broussard, Blaine Kern III

Amber and her friends visit Joshua Tree for a fun girls’ trip but face hostility from locals. As tensions escalate and Amber’s dark past surfaces, their rebellion ignites – turning their desert getaway into a jaw-dropping game of revenge.


I will admit the only reason I watch this film was for the female cast many of whom I remember from seeing other movies or TV shows and remember them being quite striking. 

The first 20 minutes of this film seems to be girls being as sloppy and reprehensible as frat brother movies with dialogue that seems like it was for GIRLS TRIP or EUPHORIA. 

This being a young female version, only then the film turns slightly to a sexual assault and trauma afterwards kind of drama. after seeming to Wade into the uncertainty of a music video-level boat party.

And just from the beginning alone, it seems to run a record for numbers of uses before the F word. 

The film does offer plenty of eye candy and titillation that is not to be approved, but it seems at first no one has a non-revealing outfit. Then the film seeming to settle into the message that all men are evil. 

One understands the message the film is trying to convey and what it’s trying to say, but it still leads to a film that feels very uncomfortable and after a while, get tired of what it is saying on it soap box as it gets to be the overwriting message that feels a bit much after a while, not unwelcome, not trying to discredit it, but maybe should’ve been a little more subtle.

Throughout the film, there is loads of exposition once they reach their destination. As then, that seems to be the only time they have any other opportunity to do it as the film tries to let the audience get to know the characters, even though essentially we only really get to know the lead.

It seems aimless than towards the third act. It finally seems to be trying to make a point of its own, even though it seems vague to match the mindset and mood confusing at first, as we aren’t sure if this is just all paranoia and all in the main characters head.

Lunar turned into a female, friendly revenge tale that while little obvious and over the top as well as extreme makes sense, even as the film leaves many loose ends

No one can see why it has an female audience  thoughseeks to want to attract more of a male audience by Trojan horse, with skin in display and more a party hearty attitude,leaving you to think one waiting reveals what it believes and not to subtle away

Grade: C- 

BUZZKILL (2026)

Directed By: Jem Garrard

Written By: Suzanne Kelly 

Editor: David Trevail

Cast: Siena Agudong, Brec Bassinger, Kealaboga Masango, Aliyahs Interlude, Angela Daytona Wu, Frances Sholto-Douglas, Aleesa Maria-Dione, Dean Goldblum.

Follows a group of sorority sisters who end up trapped with a murderer. Nora’s tipsy memories hold the clues to figuring out who is killing their friends, but she can only remember them when she’s drunk.


This film is more of a comedy with horror elements. Kind of what some critics and audiences are accusing the latest RESIDENT EVIL movie of being I have a differing opinion. I feel like that’s more of a horror film with comedic elements.

As this film has more sense of humor about itself, it realizes that so it can play up more of the clichés well-being, just as guilty with them. Especially as a slasher film.

This is a to be original movie and one of the better ones as it is directed by one of their veterans Jem Garrard whose previous film TAKE OUT I enjoyed even though that phone was more of a thriller. This is a very glossy audience, pleasing film. As usual, this film was made in South Africa Africa look to make like any random American city or town

Mostly in one location, the film is fun though what really makes the film shine is a lead performance by actress Siena Agudong, who truly makes you feel for her dilemma is hilarious in the right spot and even as a screwup makes you really care about her character and believe in her through it all

The only truly gruesome parts of the film are the kill/death, which are pretty brutal and while they go along with the movie are a little bit quite shocking considering how light the film usually is up to that point.

The film has tried to put twist on the stereotypical nature of the characters while preserving them in that mode so while you feel sorry for some characters death, you don’t really feel too much out of just not wanting to see another human being die because we are never left to really get to know the characters that much. 

This is a film that is obviously made more for fun and enjoyment rather than having too much depth so this is definitely a film where you have to take it as it is

Now, if you’re looking for a cute little mysterious no-brainer movie that stays entertaining throughout, I would say this is the Film for you

Grade: C+

BLOODY TENNIS (2026)

Written & Directed By: Nikiais Chryssos 

Cinematography: Constantine Campean 

Editor: Anselm Koneffke

Cast: Sandra Goldberg Kempp, Elina Lowensohn, Tracy Gotoas, Lily Taieb, Juliana Vieira Guerra, Helena Zengel, Zlatko Buric, Lucie Zhang 

Follows Sophie, who is admitted to an elite tennis academy hidden in the South of Europe, where she must contend with fierce competition and the school’s increasingly sinister undercurrents.


Think of this as SUSPIRIA with a bit of CHALLENGERS. Only without either’s memorable score. A quarter of those film’s budgets and not the same quality 

The inspirations might be due to popularity. Houston’s its own odd mess. Because in the middle of all this mystery an aggressive love story does rear its head. 

The film is quite stylistic at times. Then unpredictably crazy at other times. That seems like it seeks it out also. Definitely In a more European style. As Is most of the cast. An International mix. 

Which also marks the film’s mood as cruel but Intriguing. Half of the violence is the emotional one that they put upon one another

The film is quite gruesome in its violence and what it portrays onscreen which makes it memorable. 

Grade: C

AMERICAN CARNAGE (2022)

Directed By: Diego Hallivis

Written By: Diego Hallivis And Julio Hallivis 

Cinematography: Unax Mendia 

Editor: Alex Marquez 

Cast:  Jorge Lendeborg Jr., Jenna Ortega, Allen Moldonado, Eric Dane, Brett Cullen, Yumarie Morales, Jorge Diaz, Bella Ortiz, Catherine McCafferty 

After a governor issues an executive order to arrest the children of undocumented immigrants, the newly detained youth are offered an opportunity to have their charges dropped by volunteering to provide care to the elderly. Once inside the eldercare facility, the volunteers discover the governor and the facility’s supervisor have cooked up a horrifyingly depraved conspiracy that endangers the young and the old in this twisted thriller-comedy.


Well this film certainly is never truly surprising as it seems to play by all the cliché rules that one is used to. 

There are a few qualities that I can give the film. The young cast is likable particularly the three leads played by Jenna Ortega (One wishes she had more to do with her role) Jorge Lendeborg Jr (who is always cast in these kinds of lower budget straight to streaming kind of films of this type but never quite gets the starring roles he deserves in bigger projects)  and Allen Moldonado here as the wise guy comedic role that he has been playing on so many television shows, So far it is his expertise. 

Also, the film at least is trying to say something being subversive with its political message and allegory that fits into not only the politics of the time, but unfortunately even current politics. Just putting it under a teen horror window.

The film is entertaining enough as you watch it, but it’s instantly unforgettable after you watch it. It’s a popcorn movie with a message even as it tries to be something bigger and better.

It’s a film that just constantly feels like it falls too short in many categories in violence, Exploitation characters,  scares.

It seems better suited for an introduction into horror movie with a bit of satire as it seems to play more for a teen audience, but it’s rating and some material might keep it out of their grasp. Even as it seems perfectly to fit with that audience.

It’s not terrible. It’s just basic that could be a lot tighter and faster but at least it seems to try.

As the film plays like a Hispanic exploitation film. Where all the bad guys are caucasian. I have no problem personally with that as would like to see more films like this. Though one wonders why thebdsrkest skinned character. Who is black and Spanish mixed is the only one of the heroes to murder someone on screen. Even though heroically. 

Most likely the audience will come here for Jenna Ortega even as she plays one of the smaller leading roles there’s nothing here that might indicate her future superstar status, but she does. What is required of the role perfect as a follow-up to her Disney show STUCK IN THE MIDDLE and the film THE BABYSITTER 2: KILLER QUEEN 

Put out by Blumhouse Productions. This might have worked better as an episode of their horror anthology series INTO THE DARK. In which episodes go from 60 minutes into feature film length. 

Grade: C 

ESCAPE ROOM: TOURNAMENT OF CHAMPIONS (2021)

Directed By: Adam Robitel 

Written By: Will Honley, Maria Melnik, Daniel Tuch and Oren Uziel

Story By: Christine Lavaf and Fritz Boum

Based On Characters Created By: Bragi Schut 

Cinematography: Marc Spicer

Editor: Steve Mirkovich and Peter Pav

Cast: Taylor Russell, Logan Miller, Indya Moore, Holland Roden, Thomas Cocquerel, Carlito Oliver, Lucy Newman-Williams, Deborah Ann Woll 

Six people unwillingly find themselves locked in another series of escape rooms, slowly uncovering what they have in common to survive. Joining forces with two of the original survivors, they soon discover they’ve all played the game before.


This sequel just came along way too fast and you can tell as everything feels rushed on the plus side it gets to the point, but we considering we already know or most of us should know what’s to be expected. You don’t mind if we at least got to know more of the characters or the film offered something like a little more behind the scenes of how everything works.

Even as the film and it filmmaker, expect the audience already to know everything and like most equals just seems to get to the action, but then offers pretty much the same premise that the original film offered only this time the characters are more in the no, which is why one would guess that we don’t really get to know them

The film is not written by the first films writer. So it seems like they brought in a new writers trying to put a voice to someone else’s songs and while this is a common practice in Hollywood, it feels like maybe this new script is a little bit or chooses to be more pop when maybe it should’ve had a little more depth with the music and lyrics. 

though it could also be as there are four listed Screenwriter on this phone that everybody was overwriting each other, and then trying to make it simple, not to mention that the story for the film apparently needed two people to come up with it as that how how bonkers this film seems. 

Not to mention this a film that has a bigger budget, but still manages to look cheaper than the first film as truly here everything looks like it is happening on A set or on various sets throughout a studio lot

As we only really get to know the characters right before they perish, which seems to let the audience know what’s about to happen so the film doesn’t really offer any mystery. Which leaves it to be predictable and uninteresting for the most part.

Even towards the end of the film. It just seems to throw out familiar faces to keep the first films audience interested in how did that person get there?

The first escape room film was surprisingly fun and entertaining playing more like a guilty pleasure. This sequel feels like there was very little effort made. It feels more of a cash in that believes that it’s smarter than what it is, unfortunately wasting the cast, especially lead Taylor Russell, Holland Roden and Indya Moore. Talents and times

Grade: C-

RESIDENT EVIL (2026)

Directed By: Zach Cregger

Written By: Zach Cregger and Shay Hatten

Cinematography: Darius Wolski

Editor: Joe Murphy 

Cast: Austin Abrams, Paul Walter Hauser, Kali Reis, Zach Cherry, Will Merrick, Sara Paxton, Zoe Bella, Andrea Miltnerova

A hapless courier is tasked with delivering a package to a remote hospital. He soon finds himself caught in the middle of an outbreak and must fight through hordes of mutated creatures to survive.


Let me start off by saying I never really played the video game of this so I don’t know the actual storyline or history. All I know is the previous films. Which were entertaining, but definitely products of their time. None of them were truly masterpieces or what one might qualify is good but they were passable.

This film is another beast as this film ties into the resident evil lore of the video game, but this could’ve totally been an original film and it would’ve worked just as well. It just now has a bit more of a built-in audience as it is connected to the game. Luckily any audience members can follow as it goes along 

Now let’s tackle the elephant in the room. Surprised at how much humor there is in the film throughout. There is a shocking a certain amount of laughs, but it is a horror film through and through with comedic elements thrown In. Rather then the other way around. It feels like the comedy is to acknowledge the ridiculous nature of what is happening at times. As well as way to have a release of tension every once in while. As there is still graphic violence and plenty of jump scares.

The protagonist isn’t the typical action hero nor the usual horror hero so him making bad decisions makes more sense and makes them feel more identifiable for the audience, as well as keeps the plot moving, and the action popping. The credit has to be given to Austin Abrams, as this is pretty much almost a one man show performance at least for most of the film it stays that was, very physical. Which will remind many of Bruce Campbell in THE EVIL DEAD films. As well as that type of mood. Definitely a star-making turn for him.

When other character characters appear in the film, it always feels a bit strange as we’re so used to only deal dealing with our main character. It’s nice to see Paul Walter Hauser in this film in a pivotal role that comes across more as comedic relief as well as Kali Reis as a kick ass security expert. 

The film is scary yet feels fun as we get deeper in the character faces more challenges as well as discovery, which does eventually feel like the film is leveling up as it goes along. 

One of the smarter aspects of the film is how they naturally create POV shots like from a video game that are thrown in time to time and made to look more makeshift as a survival method In dark places.

The fact that there’s very little dialogue keeps the film more tense.

Zach Cregger even though he doesn’t have to shows what he can do with ip that he didn’t originate and still make a film that is all his own. It’s sort of reminds one of what Frank Darabont was trying to do when he was still running the television show. THE WALKING DEAD. In wanting to obviously have the stories in the plot, but be able to take a moment for maybe a side story or give a chance for a side character to shine.

Though you have to say that for Zach Crager, this is 400 out of the successes for his films. Though he did co-direct and star in the comedy MISS MARCH. I will say that I enjoyed this more than I did his film WEAPONS. 

The unexpected third act that tells the tale of what would normally be a side character and allows for them to have depth plus allow allowing us to see what role they played in the overall story. 

Have to give it credit for where it goes. Especially when there are some Ty of places you don’t think it will venture to and it does and practically bathes in it. 

It’s easy to agree that this is the best out of all of the franchise obviously.

Grade: A

THE PEOPLE WHO OWN THE DARK (1976)

Directed By: Leon Klimovsky 

Written By: Gabriel Burgos, Vincente Aranda and Joaquim Jorda

Cinematography: Miguel Fernandez Mila 

Editor: Soledad Lopez 

Cast: Nadiuska, Alberto De Mendoza, Teresa Gimpera, Emiliano Redondo, Julia Sali, Tomas Pico, Diana Polakov, Antonio Mayans, Leona Devin, Ricardo Palacios 

Wealthy elites gather at a remote castle for a decadent party when nuclear catastrophe strikes. They emerge to find the surrounding townspeople irrevocably blinded by the blast, helpless and panicked. As the survivors venture into this collapsed world, they discover a shadowy faction called “The People Who Own the Dark,” whose motives remain obscure and threatening. Paranoia escalates. The castle becomes both sanctuary and trap. Trust disintegrates as survival instincts collide with moral decay.


At first, This looks like it’s going to be one kind of movie entirely. It opens with wealthy people gathered at an estate for what appears to be a very exclusive bacchanal, somewhere between EYES WIDE SHUT and SALO only with considerably less Stanley Kubrick or Pasolini and considerably more exploitation movie energy. And then, suddenly there is an apocalypse.

A bomb blast wipes out civilization, leaves the surrounding population blind, and turns this decadent little gathering into a survival story. Except the people coming after our privileged partygoers aren’t zombies or mutants. They’re ordinary human beings who have been blinded by the blast and understandably aren’t thrilled when one particularly trigger-happy member of the group starts murdering them.

From there, the movie becomes something of a low-budget DAWN OF THE DEAD with the survivors fighting off the furious townspeople while gradually discovering that their biggest threat may actually be each other.

Because nothing reveals someone’s personality quite like the possibility of dying.

The film is cynical about privilege, survival, desire and human nature, but surprisingly, it also becomes more emotionally involving than you might expect. What initially feels like a disposable exploitation picture slowly develops into a story about people you may actually care about including a rather touching and heartbreaking love story.

And yes, this is another post-apocalyptic movie where humanity apparently has to relearn the concept of basic decency. You don’t really know anyone until panic sets in, and once survival becomes the only objective, morality becomes a very negotiable concept.

The movie even manages to complicate its own characters. You might expect to cheer when these wealthy, decadent people get their comeuppance, but the longer you spend with them, the more you realize that some of them don’t necessarily deserve the fates coming their way.

It’s essentially a B-movie with ambitions of being something deeper. Sometimes it gets there. Sometimes you can practically see the seams. But it works surprisingly well, largely because it keeps moving and mercifully doesn’t overstay its welcome. It makes its points, occasionally quite bluntly, and gets out before it can completely wear out its welcome.

And then there is Nadiuska. The film is certainly not shy about making sure its female cast is easy on the eyes, but Nadiuska has a screen presence that makes you stop paying attention to the plot for a moment. She is absolutely gorgeous. A genuine screen siren and the movie gives her one of its more romantic and emotionally affecting storylines. That makes what happens to her character all the more heartbreaking.

She brings a warmth and vulnerability to the movie that helps make the ending hit harder than it probably has any right to. Among all the chaos, violence and rather obvious social commentary, her character gives the film something genuinely human to hold onto.

So, yes, the film initially promises you exploitation and then hands you something slightly different. Thankfully, it’s a pretty good trade.

I wouldn’t call this a great film, but it’s an entertaining, strange and surprisingly effective one. It has enough atmosphere, sex, violence, social commentary, survivalism and melodrama to satisfy the exploitation crowd, while occasionally reaching for something more thoughtful underneath it all.

Not exactly essential cinema, but certainly not disposable either.

Grade: B-