THE NAKED GUN (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Akiva Schaffer 

Written By: Akiva Schaffer, Dan Gregor and Doug Mand 

Cinematography: Brandon Trost 

Editor: Brian Scott Olds 

Cast: Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson, Paul Walter Hauser, CCH Pounder, Danny Huston, Kevin Durand, Busta Rhymes, Liza Koshy, Cody Rhodes. Eddie Yu 

Following in his father’s footsteps, a detective works to solve a murder case and save his police department from closure.

This film comes off as no harm, no foul as it’s a remake but more in spirit and paying homage to the original naked gun and thus police squad movies. There’s nothing wrong with the film though of course it’s going to be more modern. It kind of loses itself as it feels like the character is more random.

Whereas in the original film, Frank Draben is the hero and kind of silly and very stupid, but it gets the job done. Seems to know what he’s doing enough in that universe that he’s a police detective in and feels like more of a full character with a steady history.

Here sometimes it just feels like they throw a lot of stuff at the wall to see what sticks, especially in characters where their history or personalities will change on a dime. So that even though this is a comedy, if there isn’t anything you can really hold onto you’re just throwing in the chaos. It’s a bit more scattershot. As one of the producers is Seth Mcfarlane of FAMILY GUY. It has that kind of random humor at times. That has nothing to with the story really. Eden write it, but it has his fingerprints on it.

Which is where some of the films weaknesses lie where it doesn’t feel like joke so much it feels like those spoof movies that used to come out of every year where they would just try to take down recent trends of the year, maybe television and movies reality stars and there’s a bit of that humor here more than was in the original naked gun. You could call it in evolution of humor, but it also kind of cheapens everything.

Now, while this film has inspired, casting, whereas Liam Neeson has always flirted with comedy. This is one of his first where he goes in the full blown leading character comedy and while he’s good at it, it doesn’t feel as strange or like the stunt casting that maybe it should it’s understandable. Maybe he’s trying to follow and Leslie Nielsen‘s shoes, whereas Leslie Nielsen was a dramatic character actor for most of his career until the airplane movies and then he started slowly going into more silly or spoof in comedy and that being pretty much most of the films he played in

Again, as being so used to seeing Liam Neeson, kind of do this before it doesn’t come across as shocking as maybe it was intended to be or as different, as it was intended to be speaking of stunt, casting not that there’s anything wrong with his performance Danny Huston. it would’ve been at least a little more notable if the villain was played by an actor who we had known previously more as a friendly face or someone who usually plays nice or good guys playing that villainous type of role as at least it would’ve brought something new to the table, but again maybe this is just an evolution of this type of film and franchise

It also would’ve been nice if the descendants of Nordberg originally played by O.J. Simpson had more to do than making an obvious joke in one scene. Then we never see that character again, but that’s more of a nitpick.

Pamela Anderson, Paul, Walter Hauser CCH Pounder all do really well with their roles they do what’s required. Even though they’re more secondary players and it’s nice to see Pamela Anderson on the big screen. As it now seems like she’s getting the movie roles she should have back when her career was red hot. Instead of just becoming a celebrity or more sex symbol who sometimes acted rather than being actress who just happened to be very voluptuous and sexy

The film is fine for what it is obviously you’re not supposed to take any of this too seriously so as long as you’re just looking for a laugh, I don’t think you’re gonna find much disappointment with this film, and it stays within the tradition of the franchise and makes an attempt at a nice reboot, but it just doesn’t feel the same even though it does have scenes of hilarity that will make some laugh hard especially the snowman seen personally

Though if this is your type of humor, I don’t think you’re gonna go wrong with this film.

Grade: C+

NOBODY 2 (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Timo Tjahjanto 

Written By: Derek Kolstad and Aaron Rabin

Cinematography: Callan Green 

Editor: Elisabet Ronaldsdottir

Cast: Bob Odenkirk, Connie Nielsen, Christopher Lloyd, Rza, Colin Hanks, Sharon Stone, John Ortiz, Colin Salmon, Daniel Bernhardt, 

Workaholic assassin Hutch Mansell takes his family on a much-needed vacation to the small tourist town of Plummerville. However, he soon finds himself in the crosshairs of a corrupt theme-park operator, a shady sheriff, and a bloodthirsty crime boss.

this sequel is pretty much more of the same only not as deep or caring. It seems to go through the motions, but instead of a sequel it almost feels like a side pack of action sequences they didn’t use in the first one only set in a new location. 

It tries to further the main character a bit but again it just seems like the same thing. Nothing seems to truly get deep end except to explain why he’s still doing the same kind of business from the first film. It doesn’t help build a world just offering us an excuse for more action sequences 

While trying to stay comedic to an extent.

Even the things that should be exciting end up playing rather bland for instance, having Sharon Stone is the big villain what should have been a comeback ends on a whimper sort of like when Jean-Claude Van Damme was the villain in the expendables part 2

The film seems oddly rushed too so if you like the first film, you you’ll probably enjoy this film or at least be entertained by it, but it doesn’t offer much which is disappointing considering it’s directed by Timo Tjahjango 

A noted action director making his English language, American film debut after such classics as THE NIGHT COMES FOR US. 

Though to be fair, he was a replacement director only brought on eight weeks before production started. 

As the film has it’s fair share of action, which is what the film is mostly about as the plot just seems very thin and just there to connect everything for there to be this violence. The problem is going in the first films Violence was noteworthy, here It just feels like it’s more of the same and not as impressive.

It’s pretty cut and dry. You can see why they put this film out in the summer. As it plays like a typical summer action film with less imagination and more the continuing adventures of and it being barely 90 minutes can’t say that there’s much substance but it will please. It’s fans well enough as long as they’re not looking to dig too deep Honestly, it just feels like filler or the film equivalent of filler to a continuing franchise which considering it kind of bombed, I don’t know if there will be another one, though I hope if there is another one, they put more time heart thought into it so that it can truly be What it seems designed to be a B movie version of JOHN WICK

Though I will admit when it’s in its element, it is fun and entertaining. Even if it’s an obvious cash grab.

Grade: C

NOVOCAINE (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Dan Berk & Robert Olsen

Written By: Lars Jacobson 

Cinematography: Jacques Jouffret 

Editor: Christian Wagner 

Cast: Jack Quaid, Amber Midthunder, Ray Nicholson, Matt Walsh, Jacob Batalon, Betty Gabriel, Lou Betty Jr., Conrad Kemp 

When the girl of his dreams is kidnapped, a man incapable of feeling physical pain turns his rare condition into an unexpected advantage in the fight to rescue her.

————————————————————————

It Might be my age, but I didn’t expect this film to be so gruesomely violent. Which is just one of the surprises of this film. Though it also made it a bit hard to watch at times.

As it involved, broken protruding bones, and fingernails being taken out. Which are usually two of the things I can’t stand seeing on screen as far as violence luckily teeth being knocked out or removed is not shown on screen.

No, this is a surprisingly enjoyable action film with comedic elements at times obviously dark comedy that reminds me of the mid budget action films that studios used to release and that you would get excited for to watch that weekend as this film does have a high concept, but is worth it as it has layers that to help enforce the concept, but also serve the film and its characters as well as a story

It’s not a genius film, but it certainly is entertaining and gives the audience what it wants and offers maybe a little more than what they expected.

The cast is great throughout Jack Quaid, who is in many films. These days proves he does have that leading man, charming charisma as an every man Amanda Midthunder is perfectly cast as a love interest that he goes through all these hardships for sweet enough yet enticing enough to be believable as a woman that you risk it all for

The rest of the cast fulfill, their roles and characters excellently that they come off as believable, and that you actually care even if some of them are a little bit more disposable than you expected, Within the rhythms of the film. 

You never find yourself bored you might even think that this film was made by the filmmaker of the crank movies with its intensity, though this is definitely a softer core version of those films not to mention the humor isn’t quite as offensive, nor is the plotting as over the top.

The film is a fun ride. It’s memorable but doubt it will be anyone’s favorite though it might be one that you would tell your friends about. Definitely one that is a premier example of its kind that are rarely made by a studio anymore.

As the premise and cast would make you believe that this film would be more suited for streaming, but its quality is definitely made more for movie theaters.

Grade: C+

THE AMATEUR (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: James Hawes 

Written By: Ken Nolan and Gary Spinelli 

Based on the Novel By: Robert Littell

Cinematography: Martin Rhue

Editor: Jonathan Amos

Cast: Rami Malek, Laurence Fishburne, Holt McCallany, Danny Sapani, Julianne Nicholson, Jon Bernthal, Michael Stuhlbarg, Rachel Brosnahan, Adrian Martinez, 

When his supervisors at the CIA refuse to take action after his wife is killed in a London terrorist attack, a decoder takes matters into his own hands.

————————————————————————

You probably seen this film before it’s a pretty much a revenge tail where a character seeks revenge for the death or murder of a loved one and at first seems too weak or too meek 

Who somehow against all odds starts achieving in getting their revenge, but not always in the way in which they seek or expected .

This could’ve been a random episode of any kind of government series, or even then a full season of a limited series about the same subject in story, which would’ve at least given the film a chance to flash more of the characters out other than the lead and those who are working against him .

The film is pretty average. It stays entertaining and tries to offer some surprises that you might see coming though it’s not quite as action packed as maybe the trailer or storyline might have the audience believe there are action sequences, but they’re nothing phenomenal or breathtaking. They’re fairly average and actually pretty quick so that this plays off more as a dramatic thriller than anything else.

The twist and turns truly do show how smart that the main character is for what he might lack and physical prose, though it doesn’t help that some of the bigger supporting cast names are barely in the film for long periods of time and are severely underused 

One can understand why Rami Malek produce this and starting it as most likely there aren’t that many who would see him in this role naturally or as he plays the nerdy parts well the more physical aspects of the role would leave most in question. Which is actually one of the reasons why we might not see Rami Malik in so many films is that he’s hard to cast as he’s wiry physically and has quite a strange look and at times feels tilted and gives meek line readings.

That make him come across as a bit odd or more seeming like a character, actor, pro more eyeball rules, rather than leads or even villains. The film does pack a punch, but it’s not a lethal one. It’s more of a jab that will keep you entertained while watching though probably instantly forget once you’re done. It’s a great popcorn entertainment with a great cast that you wish had more to do.

as he just constantly sit through the film, waiting for all this to build up into something bigger and better or at least more and unfortunately, it doesn’t. It kinda goes out on a whimper rather than an extravaganza.

No, it’s not a lost cause, But  it’s nothing to write home about it. Does what it seeks out to do it entertains it makes you think you get caught up with the story and the characters but it’s just not that memorable and considering the cast that is on screen should be better.

Grade: C 

NIGHT CALL (2024)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Michiel Blanchart 

Written By: Michiel Blanchart, Gilles Marchand and Laurent Brandenbourger

Cinematography: Sylvestre Vannoorenberghe

Editor: Matthieu Jamet 

Cast: Joanthan Feltre, Natacha Krief, Jonas Bloquet, Romain Duris, Thomas Mustin, Sam Louwyck, Nabil Mahat 

This night is like all the others for Mady, student by day, locksmith by night. But Claire, the enigmatic young girl he helps out that night, is not who she claims to be. Mady has only one night to prove his innocence in a city in turmoil.

————————————————————————

This is a film I pretty much went in blind and so happy I did. As this film stays lively throughout.

This is one of those films and thrillers where it takes place all In One evening that seems endless. As a character had until dawn to get themselves out of trouble or else they are doomed. It is an International release from Belgium. Where you can recognize some of it’s Influences. 

The film offers the usual double crosses. Not truly being able to trust anybody. The cops are vicious as the criminals. So where do you turn.

The film also has the chaos of a Black Lives Matter protest with people and police filling the streets, as a background that they are operating in. Which are some of the elements that keep it from playing basic or typical. Truly the only innocent character is the lead who is desperately trying to get out of trouble. Though even he gets some blood on his hands. It also helps that the pace is rushed but doesn’t feel that way. it’s heart is always beating fast, but perfectly timed.

It also helps that the lead is African American who is being hunted and preyed upon by all these Caucasian characters throughout, which works as symbolism. As they are hunting and exploiting him, while he is the true innocent.

It’s so exciting and well put together. Offering very little fat. So that it stays quite lean and keeps moving. No time for side stories or any romance that might be hinted at in the beginning. it’s shocking that it was the directorial debut of Michiel Blanchart 

One thing I appreciated about this film is that it isn’t sentimental at all. It is rough and tough, dog eat dog. No last minute acts of mercy. 

It also stays gritty And believable. As the cast is newcomers and unrecognizable from any previous roles except for Romain Duris as the big bad. Not to mention a henchmen who looks like a scarily tough version of Jesse Eisenberg

if anything by the end you are left with some questions. As you know for the most part what happened, but you care so much you want to know what is next for the characters. Which shows that the film has grabbed you. Though to keep up it’s tough skin it stays a bit ambiguous.

Grade: B- 

OMNI LOOP (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Bernardo Britto 

Cinematography: Ava Benjamin Shorr

Editor: Martin Anderson and Bernardo Britto 

Cast: Mary Louise Parker, Ayo Edebiri, Carlos Jacott, Hannah Pearl Utt, Harris Yulin, Chris Witaske, Steven Maier, Eddie Cahill,

A woman from Miami, Florida decides to solve time travel in order to go back and be the person she always intended to.

This is a movie I should have enjoyed as the science fiction in minor elements were interesting and even the time travel components were fun and different. Though it never quite comes together in a strong way.

As at first the film seems to stay on target Exploring time travel and the many ways in which our main character keeps going back but has to movie forward to make any progress.

Then the second half of the film changes tone. Whereas before it was a light wacky comedy. I. The second half for becomes more dramatic. As the main character has to face some harsh truths. that no matter what her fate, will end up being the same and that maybe instead of spending her time trying to change things. She should accept what she does have and appreciate the time she has left with them.

This is after she has explored different fates and  looked up people from her past. So that the film becomes overly sentimental with some hard truths passed along. 

Which could work as the film gets you to watch with comedy and sci-fi then tells the story it wants you to truly stay for and pay attention to while remembering to reference some sci-fi again to keep it in the realm. 

It’s a sweet movie, but never quite reaches its potential and makes you wonder what exactly was the aim. As it does tell a story but makes it so maudlin and complicated getting there. That it feels a little too much and never quite raises above a certain tempo. 

Even the cast who are good seem more in the middle. Never quite too strong or excited or energetic. The film feels way too laid back and passive. 

though Ayo Edebiri get’s co-Stsr credit she is more a supporting actress and it’s featured more heavily in the first half of the film than the second half and while she does what she needs to do doesn’t make any strong impression in the role, but then again the role doesn’t really give her too much to do either

It’ not a bad movie just not for me. Maybe I am missing something. 

Grade: C

OTHER (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: David Moreau

Written By: David Moreau and Jon Goldman

Cinematography: Julien Ramirez Hernan

Cast: Olga Kurylenko, Jean Schatz, Lola Bonaventure, Philip Schuler, Julie Mae’s, Anne Pascale-Clairembourg, Jacqueline Ghaye, Sacha Nugent

Alice returns to her childhood home after her mother’s death, only to find the house is rigged with surveillance tracking her every move, as a sinister presence lurks, driving her towards a terrifying revelation.

————————————————————————

I can think of worse ways to spend 90 minutes then with acresss Olga Kurylenko, who is good in the role. As the lead stretch stretching some acting muscle muscles. She hasn’t really been challenged to do before.

this is the rare starring role for her where she is front and center and truly gets to show dramatic depth in a role as for the most part, the film just follows her throughout this treacherous adventure that stays mysterious for most of the film so that it’s almost like we’re watching her play dress up through half the film as a former teen beauty contestant

This is one of those films, the end resolution you just wonder why we had to go through all of what we just did just to get here as it plays more weirder than it truly needs to be 

if there was a reason for the peculiarities, then at least it might’ve been worth it, but it just seems like the film is made that way just for that and I guess to keep it more of a mystery to the audience which again by the end just feels like it was over the top for no reason 

Now, while the film does have its moments and an ending, we should see coming, but still comes across as a very big moment of surprise. Which at least makes it feel somewhat satisfying though getting there just feels annoying.

As there are other characters in this film, but it pretty much feels like a one woman show throughout as Miss Kurylenko does most of the work and the heavy lifting

now, while this film might work for others as it is definitely a slow burn that is more of a drama with a thriller or horror elements. One can say that they were with the film halfway as it’s not much to do about nothing as there is substance here that seems to be yelled out a lot

Until all is revealed, and the impact and capacity truly takes over. So thoroughly throughout, you admire the filmmaking and how far it pushes the story and keeps the audience and suspense with the sense of mystery.

As it’s about buried hidden trauma that the film gives some clues along the way. Though I think we figured it out before her and the film literally spell out the ending what we come up with might be scarier than what we actually see at the end.

Even as it tries to be subtle about it, you can’t help but notice it just feels like the film is missing an element that would truly make it more noteworthy instead of feeling underwhelming by the end.

The film stays visually inventive, but at times it does feel like it’s being weird just to be weird. 

They left to wonder if there is a sequel will it keep the same mood? Will there be new secrets or become more audience friendly with Gore and blood baths?

By the end of you make it that far. You sneered you can decide if all of this film was worth the journey. That might have been just as effective as a short.

Grade: C

GOOD BOY (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Ben Leonberg

Written By: Ben Leonberg and Alex Cannon

Cinematography: Wade Grebnoel (Ben Leonberg)

Editor: Curtis Roberts (Ben Leonberg)

Cast: Shane Jensen, Arielle Friedman, Larry Fessenden, Stuart Rudin, Hunter Goetz, Abya Krawcheck

A loyal dog moves to a rural family home with his owner, only to discover supernatural forces lurking in the shadows. As dark entities threaten his human companion, the brave pup must fight to protect the one he loves most.

This film continuously gets on one’s nerves

It keeps highlighting elements throughout and then tries at times to be more a mystery, before dragging itself into more supernatural scenes with a metamorphosis or werewolf tail brewing that ultimately ends up as a red herring

The film is stylish and creative, especially and trying to conceal the lead actors or really any humans faces or identity, even though it tries to hint at but rides that way as one of the more interesting aspects of the film. 

The film is mercilessly short, but still feels too long like an expanded short film that wants to say more though truly doesn’t need to 

For most of the film, nothing is entirely answered and throughout we are giving part information but half the time we’re left wondering not only what is going on but what exactly is the mystery? We are trying to figure out or solve.

The film is mostly from the dog point of view, though not in the exact way, it might be expected like in the film  WHITE GOD. Though it does help inspire suspense.

As you watch you notice so many ways, this story could’ve gone and probably better than settling. It seems for a haunted house story or some kind of ghost story.  At one point, I thought it was going to be a murder mystery has to who killed the owner of the dog unfortunately it doesn’t go there.

Instead of times, it feels like a student film with a good budget. It reminded me of Skinner Mark a film. A lot of people enjoyed that I found frustrating and uninteresting so that this film almost feels like the case of the Emperor‘s new clothes.

The filmmaker was smart and making the audience fall in love with the dog as the protagonist showing loyalty to an owner, who might not deserve it, and instantly the audience is on the dog side as even when people saw the trailer for the film. The number one search seemed to be does the dog die so here you have the audience in the palm of your hand, instantly sympathetic and caring. That also in its own way feels manipulative.

What the film has going for it is it’s inventiveness. 

Grade: D 

THE BIRTHDAY (2004)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Eugenio Mira

Written By: Eugenio Mira and Mikel Alvarino

Cinematography: Unax Mendia

Editor: Alejo Lewis 

Cast: Corey Feldman, Erica Prior, Jack Taylor, Dale Douma, Liz Lobato, Jim Arnold, Sue Flack, Colin Morgan

Norman, a young man very much in love with his girlfriend, attends her father’s birthday party, held in a hotel where a sect happens to be preparing for the birth of the god it worships.

————————————————————————

Jordan Peele recently resurrected this film from its straight to video origins, and it’s almost nearly forgotten existence after being lucky enough, and should be made aware of this film and view it by star Corey Feldman

Mr. Peele was blown away by the film so much and that he included it in a program series of films, he showed a film festival audience for draft House films to find it and restore it print and now released bigger and further than it ever did before, allowing for an audience, it never had and it should’ve had before especially as it was never theatrically released officially

So even behind-the-scenes, it has a miraculous story of building up an audience over the years and getting noticed as the film does certainly feel worth it even if by the end and it’s obscurity that doesn’t force the audience and audience actually think while watching it

Didn’t realize it was from the writer, Director of GRAND PIANO, Eugenio Mira. the movie at the time that totally didn’t live up to the hype, but there was something one could admire in it

That is the same thing I feel about the birthday or as I appreciate how it builds where at any point you could go anyway at first it’s more just an uncomfortable awkward comedy with Corey Feldman doing a voice, but his performance grows on you as does the movie with its oddball of characters that you can tell something is going on behind the scenes that you can’t , necessarily tell what’s going on, but you can feel. As the film has an undeniable style to it. 

Where this is the film goes along you are just happy for the main character played by Corey Feldman as he seems to go through different side adventures and trials, even if he comes across as more and more weak compared to what he is trying to achieve. 

Just like many of the supporting characters at first, he seems handled with a broad stroke before you finally start to get to learn things about him 

As the film goes along, and it seems to get crazier and crazier, more ridiculous, and a conspiracy plot thrown in the film as well where at first you are wondering if this is true and real, or just a misguided attempt by outsiders against the rich in a class struggle as the new challenge the for the main character it unfortunately looks like, What at first he dismissed as ideas of a mad person might actually be true.

As in the film he has to make certain decisions and sacrifices. Which we have seen him fumble earlier in the film, earlier but now must take action or make decisions for the fate of the future.

The film and the actors keep you invested as well as even though you can tell the film is low budgeted. It’s a tight production that makes it feel like it’s a film double or even triple budget has originality and imagination that it keeps you interested throughout I wish I could say it’s a slam dunk and one enjoys it as much as for the hype of its recovery.

I can’t say that I quite swallowed the Kool-Aid, but it wasn’t a bad drink. It didn’t necessarily grow on me. It’s a film that deserves to be seen and it certainly has found its audience. It’s not quite a classic, but it’s entertaining if you give it a chance. 

This will not be a film for everyone is a cult film, where I believe there is an audience that will appreciate it as strangely matching the suit that Corey Feldman wears. It feels more like a lounge act more than an up-and-coming stand from many will think about it, but it doesn’t quite rise to necessarily be a classic 

I’m not trying to badmouth the film nor am I saying it’s then but feel more like it’s in the middle of the road. There are plenty of things to admire about it, but there are certain things not quite as enjoyable or that hold it back from its own greatness

One can appreciate the time it takes to constantly keep building for the audience, though on the other hand, there’s also a sense that it doesn’t need to be as long as it is 

It’s a dark comedy at heart that grows on you as it has its own personality and a certainly an oddity that doesn’t try to reach too far. So definitely a film you can appreciate by it’s merits 

Grade: B-

ROOFMAN (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Derek Cianfrance

Written By: Derek Cianfrance and Kirt Gunn

Cinematography: Andrij Parekh

Editor: Jim Helton & Ron Patane 

Cast: Channing Tatum, Kirsten Dunst, Lakeith Stanfield, Peter Dinklage, Ben Mendelsohn, Uzo Aduba, Juno Temple, Melonie Diaz, Tony Revolori, Emory Cohen

A charismatic criminal, while on the run from the police, hides in a hidden space of a toy store. There, he adopts a new identity and becomes involved with an employee, beginning a relationship as unlikely as it is risky.

————————————————————————

This shows that Channing Tatum is a very adaptable actor, as he has previously been part of Steven Soderbergh‘s films in various capacities. Who has so far gotten the best work out of them next to the 21 JUMP STREET movies & franchise, which always offer a bit of a comeback for him. As it introduces him in appeal that is unexpected.

This film is another one that proves again Tatum’s charm in a role he fits into perfectly. That while being tough, there’s a sensitive soul, a romantic who has depth and is not all surface.

This is actually Director Derek Cianfrance most mainstream film, (THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES, BLUE VALENTINE) but it still maintains his Indie artistic flourishes that grabbed the audience and keep the film from seeming like Hollywood fluff. Even as it adds to his repertoire of another failed romance story for him at the helm.

Another big surprise in the cast is Kirsten Dunst, who is thoroughly believable in her role, as the religious single mother whom Tatum‘s character falls for, especially after watching her under surveillance for so long.

This film is based on a true story that fits into the mold of movies like BERNIE and HIT-MAN (both directed by Richard Linkletter) that humanize is supposed to harden criminals, making their tales a bit more comedic & light than they normally would be told. Having the audience root for the criminal even if we know in the end, there will not be a happy ending at least not a traditional one. These films are usually more about the character or characters as well as the ensemble and ambience that is around them.

Was surprised that this film bombed at the box office. As it seems to have all the right elements for a non-traditional romantic comedy, but enough material that would appeal to more of a broad audience. It seems that maybe as it was a more grown-up, adult, human interest, drama and comedy, As well as being told in a small simple way that doesn’t have as many gimmicks or distractions, full of wackiness or slapstick, nor action that audiences didn’t go out and seek it more. Though could easily see this film being more of an audience pleaser.

Now some audience members might complain about the romance angle. Which might slow it down for some, but is what humanizes the characters and the story. Which makes it so compelling, rather than something thinner that you watch for action or antics. it doesn’t have to rely on filler it fills out the film.

I won’t lie and say this is the most exciting film, but it’s a nice down home story that entertains and grabs you as it goes along

Grade: B