THE GOD OF COOKERY (1996)

Directed By: Stephen Chow and Lik-Chi Lee
Written By: Stephen Chow, Man Sang Lo and Kan-Cheung Tsang
Cinematography: Jingle Ma
Editor: Ka-Fai Cheung

Cast: Stephen Chow, Karen Mok, Vincent Kok, Man-Tat Ng, Tats Lau, Chi-Shing Chan, Jung Chen

The God of Cookery, a brilliant chef who sits in judgment of those who would challenge his title, loses his title when a jealous chef reveals him to be a con-man and humiliates him publicly. As this new chef takes on the God of Cookery’s role, the former God tries to pull himself back on top again, to challenge his rival and find once and for all who is the true God of Cookery.


This is a riches-to-rags story of trying to make a comeback. Where the main character actually Manages to learn something on his way trying to make a comeback.

Where he falls in with an ensemble of oddballs and low lives. Where an asshole stays an asshole but learns some depth and integrity.

Having only seen a few of Writer/Director/Star Stephen Chow’s later more popular movies such as KUNG FU HUSTLE and SHAOLIN SOCCER. Watching this movie isn’t too far off from his later material. Though here a little less polished, the same kind of humor is more broad and slapstick without the heavy reliance on CGI & special effects as much.

His films still come across as more cartoonish. Due to them seeing more like live-action cartoon animated films. Though in all of the films I have watched, the earlier films are more cynical. While his later films are more positive and open. Though this film doesn’t feel as much of a fantasy.

This film Is more of a physical comedy and seems to love to showcase the grotesque.

Though for all the comic violence, blood seems to underline that there are at least some consequences of it.

Though the film is more made for adults. The film like most of his again has a childlike look at the world making even the most dangerous things seem fun. The humor remains juvenile yet usually funny. He still manages to bring some martial arts into it 

The film flows well tighter than her harmoniously. As it comes across at times as a like note to food. Not necessarily a love note though. That showcases the evil of corruption At every turn of business.

The film has a bizarre third act which is strange even for this film. 

Again Stephen Chow is starring, writing, and directing putting himself center stage but happily not failing and managing to impress. He even uses his actual name for the character. 

GRADE: B-

KING OF COMEDY (1999)

Directed By: Stephen Chow & Lik-Chi Lee
Written By: Stephen Chow, Erica Lee, Kan-Cheung Tsang, Man-Fai Cheng and Min-Hang Fung
Cinematography: Wing-Hang Wong 
Editor: Kit-Wai Kai and Chi-Wai Yau

Cast: Stephen Chow, Karen Mok, Cecilia Cheung, Man-Tat Ng, Kai-Man Tin, Chi-Sing Lam, Po Chun Chan, Joe Cheng

A bar girl hires a struggling actor to give her acting lessons so that she can feign a greater interest in her customers. The longer they work together, the more they find they have in common.


This film from writer/director/star Stephen Chow is Still a Little Silly but more sophisticated than his usual films. Unfortunately, this is one of his more disappointing works. as it’s not as madcap it off the wall as the others and is more at the beginning of his writing and directing career 

The film has its moments but altogether doesn’t feel as strong or as funny as his usual Work. Maybe as this is a little more conventional and while he usually plays the jerk here his character seems more simple and innocent. Rather than Intentionally Difficult. 

Most of the more comedic scenes he leaves to his co-stars with him just more supporting in the scenes. Though he does let the jokes build more than Usual.

The comedic scenes that do involve him Are fun but less taxing on him. 

The film seems to start off well with a cameo from a  worldwide action superstar. Which seemed smart then starts to go downhill slowly from there.

The scenes of an action film seem to be spoofing the work of director John Woo works, but when it comes to physical gags after it seems more fake and cause for obvious Special Effects. 

In the middle of all this there is a romance and then a strange unconsummated love triangle that once it seems relieved ends up with him losing it all after finally seeming to be on the road to being successful. In a plot like that it is hard to swallow.

Then the third act totally comes out of nowhere like it was made in a last-minute decision to stretch the film and make it all worth it. As well as add some overall thrills.

The film Seems a little lost In Translation. In the end, the film seems To go all over the place and not in a necessarily cohesive way always. as even the ending seems strange and a little out of place. 

Grade: C

CALVAIRE (2004)

Directed By: Fabrice Du Welz
Written By: Fabrice Du Welz and Roman Protat
Cinematography: Benoit Debie
Editor: Sabine Hubeaux 

Cast: Laurent Lucas, Philippe Nahon, Brigitte Lehaie, Jean-Luc Couchard, Jackie Berroyer, Jo Priesta 

Marc, a traveling entertainer, is on his way home for Christmas when his van breaks down in the middle of a jerkwater town with some strange inhabitants.


This seems to be a film that expands on the scariest most memorable scenes of the Film, DELIVERANCE

The film illustrates how loneliness and the absence of a partner, particularly a woman, drives a small town mad. Is it a small town or are there different representations of one man?

Though against the other’s will.  it does at times, feel like the mechanic is a romantic in his own way.

The film comes off as eager to disturb and unsettled its audience 

While the film shocks, it’s slow as it takes its time to reveal and get to know the characters. Who you can tell he is quite disturbed by the appearance of the young man looking for his dog.

The main character seems to attract or cause desire, and those around him. Usually, it’s for his job as an entertainer so it seems to take a personal interest and his audience. 

By the end, it almost seems like karma has led him into this nightmare scenario, even though he hasn’t done anything to be hourly cruel.

This is why it sometimes feels like an extended TALES FROM THE CRYPT episode only cruel and with little to no humor, as well as no actual score with a mean-spirited comeuppance 

Some sequences are just bizarre that seem to come out of nowhere like the dancing at the bar that is strangely choreographed. Or the pig sequence in the barn, which is just downright nightmarish, but also hints of what might come. 

There are hints of bestiality abound as a given replacement for the absence of females in physical Ways, but also companionship whether that is meant to be symbolic or not that is how it comes off. It’s insulting, but also shows the growing nature of relationships with pets to take the place of what is absent in the person’s life

The film shows a disturbing and bloody nature that could be used to categorize the film as French extreme, one of the earliest examples of the genre. 

Oh, the film is dirty in all the more disturbing as it feels realistic and not like a slasher or meet-up horror scenario. 

It  takes place in a town that apparently only had one woman once, and wisely escaped if she had to go through half of what the leaders 

In the end, the film is a story of a man fighting for survival and Just unsettling, but in a familiar Milieu. 

This definitely seems made to appeal for a specialty cult audience

Grade: C

KILL BOKSOON (2023)

Written & Directed By: Sung-Hyun Byun 
Cinematography: Hyung Rae Cho
Editor: Kim Sang- Beom

Cast: Jeon Do-Yeon, Esom, Koo Kyo-Hwan, Hwang Jung-Min, Lee Yeon, Si-ah Kim, Sol Kyung-Gu, Fahim Fazli, George Tsai, Elyse Dinh 

Single mother Kill Bok Soon is one of the world’s deadliest assassins thanks to her 100% success rate on contract killings. Bok Soon works for M.K Ent, which is run by the man that taught her, Cha Min Kyo. The pair hold mutual respect for each other, but Kill Bok Soon understands that a moment’s notice could take everything away from her. Just before Kill Bok Soon is due to renew her contract, loyalties are put to the test when Bok Soon is involved in a kill-or-be-killed incident.


This has a bit of JOHN WICK in it. Only when it comes to the action. Which is more hand-to-hand than guns, though guns are used frequently. It more leans into the facts of that film’s world-building or an organization of assassins of which there seem to be many. Which has its own set of rules.

The action sequences here are noteworthy for not only the choreography and staging but for some of their humor. One, In Particular, takes place in a bar/restaurant where various killers are after only one person and end up sometimes sabotaging themselves. While other males testimonies as they perish.

The film definitely has a sheen and polish. That puts it a little above the rest. As it isn’t gritty but just as dirty as some others of Its genre 

The film does end up feeling too long at over two hours. You, unfortunately, feel it, so it’s not a smooth journey. As the film plays like a contained epic with many levels. It starts to feel endless. Especially when it plays up more the melodrama of the relationships.

Which is expected though strangely a bit strong for an action film about assassins. It is also that element at the heart of the film and pushes the running time. It might be a case of trying to be more than what is expected.

As the film makes the case of showing why maybe as a paid killer it doesn’t always help to have Friends to get to close to your colleagues

Though not a Netflix original. It feels like their brand of recent action films. Similar to GUNPOWDER MILKSHAKE only without the all-star cast. 

Grade: C+

FURIES (2022)

Directed By: Veronica Ngo 
Written By: Veronica Ngo, Nha Uyen Ly Nguyen, Nguyen Truong Nhan, Ngu Yen Ngoc Thach and Aaron Toronto Cinematography: Phunam
Editor: Nguyen Cong Dang

Cast: Dong Anh Quynh, Toc Tien, Thuan Nguyen, Rima Thanh, Song Luan, Gi A Nguyen, Thanh Nhien Phan 

A mysterious woman trains a trio of girls to take revenge on a criminal gang that abuses females. The three lady warriors risk everything to challenge this corrupt empire.


This film could have almost been nicknamed GET ‘EM GIRLS. 

Now this film doesn’t reinvent the wheel. As it pretty much is predictable and you have seen it before. It does offer excitement as you watch it and tries to provide some twists and turns of its own.

This is the first female action-oriented film that I have truly been impressed by since CHOCOLATE. This film offers female action heroes and feels like a mixture of a revenge tale with parts of  CHARLIE’S ANGELS & GUNPOWDER MILKSHAKE. Though luckily without as much humor as those films and less gunplay. As there are guns involved but this is more hand-to-hand combat with machetes and steel pipes. Think DAREDEVIL, the series’ action scenes.

So the film is a bit more vicious than expected. 

The third act of the film feels like a video game with a henchman who looks like he came out of one. This goes along with the cartoonish main villain whose real danger is the threat from those who follow him in force.

Other than actually being a dangerous fighter on his own. Where the audience questions why they follow him in the first place then.

It even offers some drama just to up the stakes and meaning In These fight scenes.

The film is well-directed and has a danger to it. Like the other films I compared it to, it has a little gloss and lots of filtered and neon lighting. That leaves the film with plenty of styles. 

Grade: B-

ASHES OF TIME… REDUX (1994)

Written & Directed By: Wong Kar Wai 
Based On The Book “The Eagle Shooting Heores” By: Louis Cha 
Cinematography By: Christopher Doyle & Pung-Leung Kwan 
Editor: Patrick Tam & Kit-Wai Kai 
 Cast: Brigitte Lin, Leslie Cheung, Maggie Cheung, Tony Leung,

Ou-yang Feng lives in the middle of a desert, where he acts as a middleman to various swordsmen in ancient China. One of those swordsmen is Huang Yao-shi, who has found some magic wine that causes one to forget the past. At another time, Huang met Mu-rong Yin and under the influence of drink, promised to marry Mu-rong’s sister Mu-rong Yang. Huang jilts her, and Mu-rong Yin hires Ou-yang to kill Huang. But then Mu-rong Yang hires Ou-yang to protect Huang. This is awkward, because Mu-rong Yang and Mu-rong Yin are in reality the same person. Other unrelated plot lines careen about. Among them is Ou-yang’s continuing efforts to destroy a band of horse thieves. Oy-yang recruits another swordsman, a man who is going blind and wants to get home to see his wife before his sight goes completely. The swordsman is killed. Ou-yang then meets another swordsman who doesn’t like wearing shoes. Oy-yang sends this man after the horse thieves, with better results. We then find out what a man must give…


The original cut was released in 1994 I am reviewing the re-edited version of 2008

I will admit that I haven’t watched the original cut yet. This is the same film only re-edited to put emphasis on different things and look at the film in a different way. Sort of like what was attempted when the Mel Gibson film PAYBACK was put out on DVD and re-edited more to the director’s original vision before the production was taken outbid his hands and re-shot and re-edited it’s also similar to the APOCALYPSE NOW REDUX putting back in cut scenes to supposedly make the film richer in content and context.

This is a great movie… To have on in the background of a party continuously playing, but sitting through it is a challenge. I love Wong Kar Wai’s work but I couldn’t wait for it to end. It was like sitting through a music video with its camera work and rapid editing. Though a music video with a thin plot seems a simple reason to link scenes of action together.

This film feels moody as you have to be in a certain type of mood to watch, more open and accepting of the story it presents. I believe the reason I didn’t enjoy it as much as Wai’s other films are that one saw the masterpieces first and came back to watch this film which doesn’t match the greatness of his other films though you can see the seeds. It almost feels unfocused half of the time as to where it is going or what it wishes to convey.

While the film is visually arresting. The story begins to get confusing and boring. When the film is on the verge of getting too boring it redeems itself with an action scene.

Director, Wong Kar wai shows that he is capable of stunning action sequences, which are rather rare in his films, but then he messes them up in this film by making the. In slow motion. Almost like a delayed slow-motion capture. This messes up the fluidity of the choreographed action, but when the scenes run at regular speed they are a sight to behold. This film had an exhausting effect on Wong Kar Wai. While on hiatus during the editing process, he wrote CHUNGKING EXPRESS to “clear his head”.

This is a visually beautiful movie, low budget with a few too many close-ups for no reason it seems. I will prefer and enjoy the first cut just like APOCALYPSE NOW REDUX.

What is interesting about Wong kar wai when it comes to most of his films is that he is a visual stylist as a director, but not, in the same way, directors like Tim Burton works most of the time in his movies. The camera stays still and he lets the sort be about the characters as they reveal relationships and the big story. Now when this is happening the lighting and colors are usually immaculate and use the landscapes to their fullest. And when the camera moves the angles he uses in the scenes are strange, but breathtaking that you feel the movie so much more because at the heart of most of his films are relationships.

It’s like Woody Allen films with less dialogue, no comedy, and no archetypes yet more open and visual. More seems to be at stake and the characters are usually young with more modest incomes plus more sensual than sexual.

It hurts to give this film such a low grade. He has made strides since this film it is an early work that hints at his future vision and genius. Still one of the better and More Interesting filmmakers still working today

 Grade: C-

BABY BLOOD (1990)

Directed By: Alain Robak
Written By: Alain Robak and Serge Cukier 
Cinematography: Bernard Dechet 
Editor: Elizabeth Moulinier 

Cast: Emmanuelle Escourrou, Christian Sinniger, Jean-Francois Gallotte, Roselyne Geslot, Francois Frapier, Thierry Le Portier 

When a strange creature crawls into a woman’s uterus she becomes a killer in order to feed the tiny terror growing within her.


This is one of those movies that came from nowhere for fame. I had never previously heard of this film and decided to take a chance at it. While scrolling through Shudder.

This Is definitely a film made for horror fans. The theme of this film seems to be literally at first men’s horniness will be the death of them. Most don’t come off well throughout the film.

As the lead female played with total commitment and energy by Emmanuelle Escourrou.  who gets infected by this parasite at first is reluctant to go through with what the parasite is forcing her to do. Working her way as a seductress to entice more victims. As she already had men all over her, even when not trying, though she was in an abusive relationship and the one man she wanted to have no interest.

The parasite in her uterus wants her to kill but not for blood or the remains. The film never seems to answer the reasons why. Just the act sets this film apart from similarly themed films in its wake like GRACE or PREVENGE.

As the parasite grows into a baby after sex and while psychically communicating and controls her more through pain and threats. So it’s almost like she is in an abusive relationship again. 

The film presents the killings not from a need, not from a maternal instinct of trying to help her child survive. As it says it wants blood but we rarely see her take it. 

The first half of the film is presented episodically like short stories of her next kill. While still on the run. 

The film offers plenty of nudity and some sex, but it’s never quite erotic, exotic, or sexy. The filmmakers do have some artistic tendencies in the film, but it seems like with a Troma Studios-type budget. That ends up having the movie feel slightly exploitative. 

The film at times feels quite silly, but it never lets loose to have fun with its wacky premise.

The film never goes where you expect. As once you believe you have it figured out. It goes another way.

GRADE: B

GREATFUL DEAD (2013)

Directed By: Eiji Uchida
Written By: Eiji Uchida and Etsuo Hiratani
Cinematography: Shin’Ya Kimura

Cast: Kumi Takiuchi, Takashi Sasano 

Nami is a young woman with numerous hangups sprouting from a dysfunctional childhood. She inherits a small fortune that allows her to pursue various interests, many of which are abnormal.


This film is definitely the work of a singular vision of director Eiji Uchida 

This is a strange character piece about a girl so encased by the loneliness that she takes to watching people not ordinary people but people who are on the outs of society and seem to have been broken or rail against the Norm.

She ends up Also giving them chances at life. As her main subject not only seeks to revitalize his life before she injects herself into it but also gives him something to love when she attacks him and tries to kill him for making a connection. She also brings him back to his war days as just trying to survive.

The film offers a few surprises such as their past together and some unsettling scenes of her trying to sexually assault him.

Though the film also seems to have something to say about religion how for some it is a savior and for others it is a tool of resentment 

This film is definitely a conversation starter if you make it through as it is at times too intense for some and maybe a little too slow for others 

There seems to be a fetishism in effect, you just keep waiting for it to surface but alas it never quite does fully. Though it does go there more than his later film LOVE AND OTHER CULTS, which may compare to the movie LOVE EXPOSURE, Which is itself a love story built around fetishes.

Until then the film stays subdued but creepy. You wish we could learn more about some characters on the sidelines. As the film is definitely a character study.

Like the lead female character likes to play games and put everything in its place.

Grade: C+

LA LLORONA (2019)

Directed By: Jayro Bustamante 
Written By: Jayro Bustamante and Lisandro Sanchez 
Cinematography: Nicolas Wong 
Editor: Jayro Bustamante And Gustavo Matheu

Cast: Maria Mercedes Coroy, Sabrina De La Hoz, Margarita Kenefic, Julio Diaz, Maria Telon, Juan Pablo Olyslager 

An aging paranoid war criminal, protected by his faithful wife, faces death while being haunted by the ghosts of his past.


The film is well put together and grafted. As things come together or are revealed slowly deepen our understanding. 

As this is a horror story with barely any scares. Which makes it all the more dramatic. With its tight cinematography and lack of score 

The film is not as scary but is more about the horrors of the past. Done to humans by their fellow man for little to no reason and how they live with themselves after. Just trying to live yet haunted knowing their own guilt.

In certain scenes, the film grabs your attention. As not only does it leave you in the middle of things but also offers no immediate explanation. While it has a tendency to start a scene in a tight close-up seemingly small then slowly moves back to reveal more complexity to the scene as you see more space revealing many remaining others in the scene but still stays artistic and quite striking in images that you might have thought was the art of the beauty of the shot was only a fraction of the overall. A piece of the ultimate puzzle. Which scenes are usually for a movie or production.  

The director does the same when a scene is in wide shots only in reverse and slowly pushes in to bring us closer to the character in the middle in a tight close-up. Again managing to reveal more, as we see certain details we miss initially as they come more into focus, but also brings us closer and more intimate with the characters who are the focal point as they come more into focus.

This also helps build the tension even when this style is phased out toward the middle. As this is a film devoted to slow reveals which is genuinely what the style and even the film are all about. 

The central location of the house becomes an odyssey in itself even without its limits it feels endless. 

The film offers striking images and angles. As we wait to see what will happen driving our imagination and expectations. Then chooses to retreat slowly leaving its own restraints. 

As the film exposes the class divide as well as race through the country and in the family’s behavior. 

What is spooky, The main character never seems to blink. Her long natural black hair could be a shroud for her. That ends up becoming more of a long frame for her beauty 

It offers up the vanity of beauty with the general’s wandering eyes. As his wife knows of his indiscretions. The young lady who comes to work for them is a native of the country and knows that is his weakness.

Who he has taken advantage of before. It offers hints that the young lady seems to be haunting him or a representation of his past.

The audience is kept expecting violence. So it works on your anticipation, expectations, and temptations offering glimpses to read the mood. 

Not as mysterious as I thought but still effective. His wife going through in dreams the crimes he committed against her in the past. This is why she haunts him as a way to get in so that other spirits slowly are allowed protestors to represent past victims and their kin.

The film even seems sequel ready if needed. As she keeps implying she is not done and might be coming for his comrades. Whom we see early on in a meeting. 

When his wife is going through in dreams the friend he committed to the young lady in the past. This is why she haunts him, as a way to get in so that other spirits slowly are allowed in. The protesters more represent past victims and their kin. That is when it all really hits. We are expecting one kind of film and the film is offering something quite unexpected but still a revenge tale. 

The film runs out of steam a little once you figure it out. Not as striking as a gothic style and goes more for harshness. A ghost story in a reality that feels a little more like a fable only modernized 

Grade: B+

SWEETIE, YOU WON’T BELIEVE IT (2020)

Directed & Edited By: Yernar Nurgailyev
Written By: Yernar Nurgailyev, Zhandos Ai Bassov, Daniyar Sostanbayev, Il’Yas Toleu, Anuar Turizhigitov & Alosher Utev 
Cinematography: Azamat Dulatov 

Cast: Daniyar Alshinov, Abel Kalyeva, Azamat Makienov, Yerlan Primbetov, Dulyga Almolda, Ahmet Sakatov, Rustem Zahnyamanov

Dastan can no longer stand the constant nagging of his highly pregnant wife and decides to run away for at least one day with his friends. The men go fishing, which would have gone smoothly, if not for a series of unforeseen events.


Like the Russian film, WHY DON’T YOU JUST DIE this film is violent out of nowhere but also usually in the middle of a highly ridiculous comedic scene. This is definitely a fun film that will have you laughing or at least giggling throughout.

As both films just are so over the top and pack so much in such a little concept that they go miles with it and it never feels like it is getting stretched too far 

So that the film feels almost like a live-action cartoon only with real-life consequences. Though the film has so much zany energy and out-of-nowhere moments. That it is hard to dislike the film. It feeds off the fear of what’s the worst that could happen and what is out there in the unknown of nature.

As it never seems to let you rest. As soon as the road trip starts it gets worse and worse. As well as funnier and funnier. 

Some jokes come across as long or expected but there is plenty all through that is unexpected. Though as fast and furious as this film is, it allows the jokes to land and spread before moving on to another one. 

None of this is meant to be taken seriously and might remind the audience of the whatever can go wrong will go wrong movies of the 1980s only with a more well-known veteran comedic cast.

Here this is a foreign gun production that screams for an American remake. Which I doubt will do the justice that this film does. As part of the humor might be that it takes place on foreign soil which is foreign to the audience. Especially when it comes to actions and reactions.

Though the film is violent it’s not so much gratuitous to an unbearable degree, but one would categorize it as a splatter comedy. 

The film does live up to it’s title and serves as a final line and a summation of the film. 

Grade: B