OUR DAY WILL COME (2010)

Directed by: Romain Gavras

Written By: Romain Gavras and Karim Boukercha

Cinematography: Andre Chemetoff 

Editor: Benjamin Weill 

Cast: Vincent Cassel, Olivier Barthelemy, Justine Lerooy, Vanessa Decat, Boris Gamthety, Randolphe Blanchet, Camille Rowe, Josephine De La Baume, Jacques Herlin, Pierre Boulanger 

The outcast red-haired teenager Rémy is bullied at school and lives with his estranged mother and sister in France. The also red-haired psychiatrist Patrick befriends Rémy and helps him to release his repressed hatred and sexuality. When Rémy sees a picture of red-haired people in Ireland, he forces Patrick to travel with him to his dreamland.


I am a fan of Director Romain Gavras. His music video work has always been wonderful and arresting and always seems to have deeper meanings than what was natural to make movies and he has made quite a few. Some have been better than others, but none seem to have the strength of his music video worked, even though visually they are all strong. Unfortunately, this film is part of that trend.

This film Is an extension of the music video free for the artist, MIA the Director Romain Garvas directed. 

Where redheads are treated as second-class citizens the video was meant to be a commentary on illegal immigration and was much more violent with you and putting them in internment camps.

The film is a bit more dramatic and is a tale of a disaffected boy who is bullied and finds a companion in a social worker who is also tired of being treated as lower class in his days he sees others who are considered better or above him who act worse, so the two of them team up on a kind of crime spree him as the mentor Trying to make the young man violent and actually live and stick up for himself.

The film seems to say something about national pride and natural-born citizens because of their heritage being treated like they don’t belong and in effect, immigrants in their own country, only raised to a little more ridiculous level and still having a tinge of white rage and supremacist feelings.

These escapades include trying to make the boy realize which sexuality he identifies with getting into numerous physical fights, and not being afraid of violence, seems to get depressed at a certain point just as the boy hits his stride and vice versa at times.

Wow, this is certainly a visible film there are many times during the film that one wishes that it was a bit more like the music video a bit more exciting, and maybe something has a bit more of something to say rather than just feeling like an excuse for these scenes and certain characters Just to behave reprehensibly but have meaning behind them. 

It’s a film I wish brought the audience in more but seems to go off on its own path and on whims that I’m not sure it’s quite what the audience is looking for. It never offers easy answers and a few that it does offer seem a bit confusing or questionable.

Though maybe in the end, that is what the film always wanted for an audience that was looking for rage to be expressed through violence or some kind of shooting spree or thinking this film was just gonna be 90 minutes of pure anger and finding that the characters for all their anger for the most part while brave are mostly cowards And still have some of their humanity, no matter the indignities put upon them.

GRADE: C

Grade: C 

JEFF OF THE CINEFILES & UNFINISHED BUSINESS: HALL OF FAME – FILE #0075: THE FAN (*DER FAN) (1982)

Written & Directed By: Eckhart Schmidt 

Cinematography: Bernd Heini

Editor: Patricia Rommel and Raoul Sternberg 

Cast: Desiree Nosbusch, Bodo Staiger, Simone Brahmann, Jonas Vischer, Helga Tolle, Klaus Munster, Ian Moorse, Wilfried Blasberg 

The hero-worship that Simone has for a pop singer is built to a crescendo until she passes out when she finally sees him up-close in a crowd of fans pushing him for autographs. She is later shocked when he lets her know that he does not love her. In an instant, she is caught “in a trance” and feels a murderous urge that is bigger than the both of them.


This review is spoiler-heavy. it’s advisable to watch the film first as this is more a discussion than a review.

This is a film one has waited quite some time to find and finally watch. It’s a film that it heard about over the years and looked forward to then saw a very, simply not as some cinematic lost Grail.

It’s a nice switch from the usual fan films where it’s usually a male stalking a female or stalking another male making it more homoerotic for the ladder, but in the former and obsession that they try to turn erotic or romantic.

A story that works like a mixtape has a different cut or see as time goes by. It’s also set at a time place and culture around a music scene that was modern at the time and very specific. 

This film deals with the same only from a female fan stalking a male rockstar. The girl is a teenager, and by far is the more gruesome of any star obsession film, as this is more a psychological drama rather than an action thriller.  

It can also be seen at first as a coming of age story that Can be seen as a rite of passage a crush on a superstar that gets to be an obsession as a fan for a teenage girl.

It also dives more into the psychology of the obsession as since it’s an underage girl it is mostly thought that it’s puberty and emotions taking over but soon realizes that it’s nothing more than a crush and that it should be rather harmless this film and the character takes it more to an extreme.

The film shows the depth of fandom, but also obsession. Believing that she is the only one who knows and understands him and that all the others are just there more for the money and Fame.

The film is more psychological than physical love it or hate it. It’s a conversation starter. 

The main character doesn’t speak much, except in her letters to the star and in monologues. Desiree Nosbusch Gives an unforgettable performance as Simone.

The audience witnesses how unstable she is to a degree in her day-to-day life as her obsession takes over all of her thoughts and actions and she cares little about anything else.

The audience suspects where it will mostly go or what will happen as the film takes its time with the situation, especially once she finally gets to meet him.

We watch as she runs away into Wonderland and finds a monster of sorts and sheep’s clothing that she believes to be her prince.

We watch as she somehow Wills her fantasy to come true with interest, and then practically the unraveling of what she sees as a romance, and what he sees as a hook-up.

Which is like an artistic love scene presenting themselves to one another before it seems to take a turn, and after he gets what he wants and is ready to throw her away or dispose of her. It is in close-up as we are now in her fantasy or viewing it through that lens once the camera pulls back after we are brought into reality just as she is.

We know something will happen, but can’t predict how severe, especially without the innocent and clean or at least non-exploit of the movie has been up to this point. It’s had its rough edges, but it’s practically been more passive, which makes it all the more upsetting.

This is not the type of film where you are waiting for a demise or where the film gets you excited or expecting any sort of violence. The film seems a bit off at first, then gets disturbing and gruesome.

The film even early on makes a point of presenting Hand-holding as a sign of who cares and who doesn’t.

Nothing that happens seems to be premeditated. Some could argue. The actions are to happen in the heat of the moment or being so young and emotionally out of control. 

It seems to go way too far though we might understand her initial act, becomes a mix of saving herself, but also still having a sick obsession and sickness with this rockstar.

The film is not as violent or as expected, though it might be the cut I viewed.

There is only one part that is not that believable as it is too clean and too fast, which is devouring him a bit cannibalizing him or at least pieces of him or at least the essence of him as a goodbye or farewell. That’s where it goes overboard but smart and getting away with fashion. Even though that is probably one of the more memorable parts of the film.

She doesn’t seem to learn her lesson as she is still delusional by the end and blocking out her act and now might be delivering his child who she believes will be reborn.

The film also has long drawn shots, but little dialogue, a synth-pop score that gets into your head. that goes well with the action and ending as once you step away from this film it is certainly one that you won’t forget easily.

The film does seem to have 3 acts 

Act 1 – Introduction/desire 

Act 2 – meet & greet romance 

Act 3 – the aftermath 

Grade: B

FULL TIME (2021)

Written & Directed By: Eric Gravel

Cinematography: Victor Seguin

Editor: Mathilde Van De Moortel

Cast: Laura Calamy, Anne Suarez, Genevive Mnich, Nolan Arizmendi, Sasha Lamaitre Cremaschi, Cyril Guei, Lucie Gallo, Agathe Dronne, Mathilde Weil, Dana Fiaque 

Just when Julie finally gets an interview for a job that will let her raise her children better, she runs into a national transportation strike.


This film seems to have the mentality that when it rains it pours.

It seems the first to be such a simple film. You know a single mother trying to do better for her kids and her life by trying to get a better job you know pays more maybe a little closer to home better hours. 

Then it turns it into a thrill a minute story of tension as she has to deal with bringing the kids to this babysitter, then trying to get to work on time where you know either trains are off schedule or late or you know the workers are having a strike, and She has to take a different route or find a totally different way to go to work 

Even you know, kind of flirting with someone who she’s not necessarily really attracted to, but she knows it suite on her just so she can get a ride and then shockingly him rebuffing her. so that even her sideline romance seems to fail in the middle of all her other hardships you rule for her throughout, but feel the loss.

And then not only that struggling to get to work late with her supervisor notices and penalizing her for but then also trying to get back home on time to pick up her kids on time you know it’s not quite run Lola run or that was it character dealing with all these different fates and felt kind of mystical this is just hard-core reality.

Justice things seem to go positive for this character they always seem to be a curveball throw as we watch in the way that she has to maneuver for survival as she faces one challenge or dilemma at a time, and usually after another close together.

It’s a portrait of one single mother that speaks for a number of them out there as they try to do their best for themselves, and most importantly, their families, and the seemingly increasing levels of difficulty and challenges they must face it seems even just to break even.

Her ex seems to disappear, avoid, and take no responsibility or offer solutions. You admire her to a degree, and the film teaches. You have to take it day by day moment by moment, each one seems to be worse and truly a horror film of its own.

Thank you to John Waters, whose list of 2023‘s best movies listed this film as one of them, or else I probably never would’ve heard of it, or probably not for some as the film is exhilarating and exemplary 

Grade: A

THE PLATFORM 2 (2024)

Directed By: Galder Gaztelu-Urtuitia 

Written By: Galder Gaztelu-Urtuitia, David Desola, Egoitz Moreno and Pedro Rivera 

Cinematography: Jones Sangroniz

Cast: Milena Smit, Hovik Kruchkerian, Natalia Trent, Oscar Jaenada, Ivan Massague, Zorion Eguileor, Bastien Ughetto 

A thrilling physical journey that allows an approach to the darkness, where it is scary to look. It appeals to the viewer’s civil responsibility and forces them to face the limits of their own solidarity.


This is an unnecessary sequel. That is more of the same but tries to keep or Impart an anti-authority message. While also including some personal stories about sacrifice and acceptance. 

The film is overblown and has the effect of feeling like we got the message the first time and now you are just pounding it into the audience’s head who Were already on board. So at times, it feels overblown and annoying. Especially including a leader who ultimately works As a physical manifestation of a villain. Who resembles a version of Jesus.

Though the film is fine and if you haven’t seen the first film it might be shocking or like something new, but if you have seen the first it’s like a procedural more of the same only different faces and new characters. Basically more of the same.

Though the film tries to add mythology to its tale it feels overblown like most sequels and a bit too much for something that should have kept it simple and not overthought it.

It will be satisfying more if you haven’t seen the first one. As this film feels unnecessary.

Grade: C+

THE COFFEE TABLE (2023)

Directed & Edited By: Caye Cesas

Written By: Caye Cesas And Cristina Borobia

Cinematography: Alberto Morago

Cast: David Pareja, Estafina De Los Santos,  Josep Maria Riera, Claudia Riera, Eduardo Antuna, Gala Flores, Cristina Dilla, Aitzair Castro

Jesus and Maria are a couple going through a difficult time in their relationship. Nevertheless, they have just become parents. To shape their new life, they decide to buy a new coffee table. A decision that will change their existence.


before I even start trying to write about this film. please know that this is a very heavy spoiler written review because it’s very hard to talk about this film without spoiling it. Don’t watch the trailer. Don’t read about it to truly experience the film. It is best to go in blind that is first.

So now here we go Secondary this film is very disturbing so if you have a light sensibility and can’t handle dark material, it is highly suggested you stay away from this movie. Especially if you are a parent.

HEAVY SPOILERS 

So now here we go

The film begins like a truly dark black bleak comedy, and it gets right to the point at first I thought it was going to play out as a bunch of just bad luck and circumstances of the purchase of this coffee table. I didn’t think it would start off so quickly with the dilemma

throughout the film, there is humor and a bit of the absurd, but I think what is generally disturbing about the film is that it also plays so real. It feels like the actual reactions of a person who is in that circumstance and then panicking and figuring out how they’re going to relieve the dilemma, and also having to deal with all these characters around them.

Considering the film takes place in one location it also almost feels like this could’ve easily been a play a stage show. Throughout plays, even the minor supplies seem to be more about character than pieces or funny material.

it’s partially a character piece as we do get to know bits and pieces about the characters and their past and their relationships and really the film depends on them and their believability and emotions. while it has a sense of dread and a cloud of despair hanging through it

Luckily, the film doesn’t go for too much shock value, or show you violence or being exploitative about the situation. The filmmaking is it distracting it’s more of the dramatics of the situation and the believability of the characters that come through the most in this film. As it stays shocking yet always believable.

what I believe makes this film feel so heavy at the end is that there doesn’t seem to be any release or Relief and even with its dark humor there’s no punchline. It’s an all-out tragedy.

As there are no true villains in this film only victims. As it plays It just seems cruel to a certain extent not that it wants to be, but you do wonder why these characters have to be caught up in this and suffer. If not at the time you know it’s coming. The only question is how and why. This is a film that you can just sit back and watch you’re going to find yourself involved somehow even if it’s just in your reactions which will most likely be loud.

By the end, you’re even wondering why this film was made it’s just so heavy and sad that this is the type of film where afterward you’re gonna need something to definitely try to cheer you up whatever you can find as it leaves you in a dark place. as this is one nasty experience that you can’t help but feel something while watching.

this is one of those films that just stays with you even if you don’t like the film or aren’t impressed by the film or its filmmaking. Though I will admit with this kind of imagination, I am interested to see what the Director comes up with next.

Grade: B 

THE STRANGLER (1970)

Written & Directed By: Paul Vecchiali

Cinematography: Georges Strouve

Editor: Francoise Merville

Cast: Jacques Perrin, Julien Guiomar, Eva Simonet, Paul Barge, Jaqueline Danno, Katia Cavaignac, Jean-Pierre Miguel, Helene Surgere, Sonia Saviange, Nicole Courcel 

Unhappy women are being murdered by Emile, a psychotic young man suffering from the delusion that his acts are mercy killings.


The title seems simple, but there is a deeper meaning, and this film proves to be so much more.

This might’ve been regular fashion back when it was made but everything feels so stylistic Maybe because, to a modern audience, it is so far and was made to feel that way. As it is a French Giallo that provides less mystery and violence and seems to be more about the setup

The first kill in this film seems like the victim, experienced it, and welcomed it. It comes off as stylish and fetishistic in a romantic or erotic way

And choosing his victims, the title character it seems like they welcome him and aren’t surprised last encounter liaison or fling before the end so that it’s almost romantic and putting them out of their misery or granting a last request.

Which ends up setting the tone for the film as a romance yet not a love story 

Almost like his actions are doing the victims of favor, as they are suicidal and feel they have no reason to live anymore. He offers assistance So they don’t do it themselves. Or go through the experience alone, nor have to worry about depending on their morals or beliefs going to hell, necessarily if religious

The victims, female, fashionable, and gorgeous, and presentation before their last breaths

The choreography of the floor show of one victim’s death scene is memorable and a delight, its style or international attitude and ideas.

The film can be drilled yet makes much out of a little and remains truly unforgettable, as well as an underrated gem that can easily throw an audience a bit of valance as the film goes on. We get to know the victims a bit more as we see the melodrama with each new one giving them, brava last scenes of their character’s last moments

We never see the actual kills only the before, and a bit of the aftermath to know that the deed was done

Wow, also witnessing the investigation of the case buying adults, Nancy, Drew, the character, and the police captain who start a kind of romance or at least a relationship hence toward romance

We watch as the killer gets upset as someone perverts his act of mercy per se by following him to the crime scenes and then stealing from the victims, making it seem like the killer’s motives are more about material gains making his gift seem  more common and presents a rivalry

Victims come off as if they feel forgotten or betrayed by the world, or maybe just betrayed by a man or lover, and they will finally be immortalized and die and finally get attention special before the end. This desperation makes them feel sparkling before putting them out of their misery.

Presented as glamorous the Weathered it feels like a Hitchcock film as it has it set pieces that are usually the murders that come off as artistic and depth at times. As the film plays, Layfair and laid-back, not too concerned or drastic despite the actions and the film’s move.

When it comes to Giallo there is a certain beauty it provides it showcases. One of the reasons I like them is that they know how to present the female characters stylishly, sensual, gorgeous and fabulous. Like screen sirens. Sexy for sure but not cheaply classy and less exploitive all about beauty. They feel like women Of class and culture. It’s presented more as normal not necessarily down to earth. Special in fact but somehow normal and approachable

Amongst the crowd with Imperfections seemingly edited out. 

The Death scenes feel like little short stories that offer glimpses of life lives and characters are given more dignity and death than might’ve had in life

They are double-crosses as the thieves seem to turn to murder groupies with funny emotional moments of turmoil as the third act is dragged out, but has plenty of beautiful moments

The film is more than just its simple title. This Gallo is a weird romance of the killer, granting his victims, and lovers wishes and making them feel special. Laissez-faire laid-back look at the serial killer and the investigation around his killings. That seems to be in no rush and strives to be more artistic than surprised filled or a procedure, except for a random dream sequence. The film is never exploited but creative and its simplicity is not so much a psychological study nor a thriller

The synopsis seems conventional, but that’s the film’s artistic aim. It has mainstream scares with deeper meanings and emotions in between that get confusing at the end and make it more cultivated.. there is also a boom mic visible in the final scene

The murder towards the end seems to be out of a discussion with the society around him, which is depressing as even the film feels like it betrays itself towards the end. There is even a boom visible in the final scene 

The film also has a great score 

Grade: B+

THE POSSESSED (1965)

Directed By: Luigi Bazzoni and Franco Rossellini

Written By: Luigi Bazzoni, Franco Rossellini, Giulio Questi and Ernesto Gastoldi 

Based on the novel by: Giovanni Comisso

Cinematography: Leonida Barboni 

Editor: Nino Baragoli

Cast: Peter Baldwin, Salvo Randone, Valentina Cortese, Pia Lindstrom, Pier Giovanni Anchisi, Ennio Balbo, Verna Lisi, Philippe Leroy 

Famous writer Bernard travels to a small lakeside town for an off-season winter vacation. He checks into an old hotel owned by Enrico and his daughter Irma expecting to meet Tilde, the maid he had a crush on the last time he visited the town. However, he discovers that Tilde has committed suicide, and when he meets the local photographer, Bernard learns that she was pregnant. He becomes obsessed with finding out whether she really committed suicide and to guess what really happened. When Enrico’s son Mario and his wife Adriana arrive at the hotel, Bernard has daydreams about Tilde’s fate.


It’s true they don’t make films like these anymore and it’s a shame

This is a film. I have only heard about it recently. It’s a film. I am happy to have discovered it’s based on a true story. It might remind some viewers of Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo more for its obsession and mystery aspects than necessarily the filmmaking or direction.

Only here it’s an Italian film and it’s beautiful to look at and the woman at the center of the mystery is pretty though not as haunting as other heroines in this type of film.

Which has the main character, a photographer, and writer comes to town to look up a female whom he had an acquaintance and took pictures of the year before and might be hoping to romance only to find that she is dead and that it was murder. He finds himself obsessed with getting to the bottom of it, aided by the few friends in town who give him hints but never quite the full story. 

It’s a short film you can pretty much guess who the guilty is, though throughout there are plenty of twists and turns and revelations that you don’t quite see coming that even the audience is introduced to that the author has until certain aspects of the story come into play.

This isn’t a very romantic film, but it’s a film shot in black-and-white and looks beautiful and the film does stay haunting even after the ending is revealed and the third act is full of twist. The film isn’t as deep and penetrating as you hope it is quite a surprise for those who don’t know about this film that is worth seeking out.

This isn’t a super sleuth tail, nor is it a tale of unrepentant evil characters. As it unfolds It’s a story that feels all the more human and it fails with characters who are more three dimensional, and ultimately tragedy is a fulfilling film by the end. 

it can only go so many places, especially based on a true story. I can’t say it’s something you’ve never seen before but it is a story that will keep your interest. It not only focuses on the who but also the Y and the aftermath

Grade: B-

THE ROUNDUP (2022)

Directed By: Lee Sang-Yong

Written By: Min-Seong Kim

Adapted Screenplay By: Lee Sang-Yong, Young-Jong Lee and Ma Dong-Seok

Cinematography: Sung-Lim Ju

Editor: Sun-Min Kim

Cast: Ma Don-Seok, Son Suk-Ku, Choi Gwi-Hwa, Park Ti-Hwan, Heo-Dong-Won, Ha Jun, Park Ti-Young, Yoon Byung-Hee 

Followed by Ma Seok-do, who heads to a foreign country to extradite a suspect. However, he discovers additional murder cases and learns about a killer who had committed crimes against tourists for many years.


At first, I didn’t know what to make of this film as I didn’t know it was a sequel, but figured it out as soon as the main character played by Ma Don-Seok shows up on the screen, he is presented like the audience should already know his backstory and what he’s capable of..I thought it was just the film, making fun or poking fun at the genre of action films. 

Let’s say a star like Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson stars in the film. You don’t necessarily need that much of a backstory because we feel like we already know the character’s personality based on the star’s personae and the roles he usually plays. 

Though as usual, the main character here is the all-knowing tough-as-nails cop who seems to win every fight and has a killer right hand when it comes to punches.

The film is tricky as at times it plays like a deadly serious thriller and action film but then at other times, it has silly comedic scenes that make a strange mixture that leaves you questioning the tone sometimes. However, that also sets it apart and makes it worth watching. 

What separates this film from becoming just another average action movie is not only the fun hero but also the truly dangerous psychopathic villain. Who Is also strangely Charismatic? Played by Son Sum-Ku, As you love to hate him. Who seems like he is virtually unstoppable.

The film truly shows that there is no honor amongst thieves as their continuous double crosses and triple crosses, though it seems like the only people who tend to be all-knowing are the hero and the villain. 

this film is cutthroat as it seems all the villains use axis, hatchet, machetes, and knives, and the cops barely use guns. It’s more either hand hand, combat or batons, though there is plenty of action. It’s not as much as you think as this is more of a thriller with action elements.

The film is actually a fun ride. As it keeps itself lively. it keeps you on your toes throughout even though you know eventually what must happen you still can’t predict how it’s going to end.

The film feels full as it gives you anything you ask for while sticking with its main points and characters.

Grade: B-

CITY HUNTER (1993)

Written & Directed By: Jin Wong

Based on the Comic By: Tsukasa Hojo

Cast: Jackie Chan, Richard Norton, Gary Daniels, Joey Wang, Kumiko Goto, Ching My Yau, Leon Lai, Paul Sinn, Ken Lo, Tzui-Pin Wei 

A self-indulgent private investigator winds up on a cruise ship full of rich patrons, gorgeous women, murderous terrorists, and scarce food.


This film comes across more as a cartoon with the requisite sound effects and visual effects with over-the-top comic antics even fantasy sequences that at times are supposed to be sexy, but come across as silly.

As it is way more comedic than his usual films.

At least the camera barely stays still for any elongated scenes or pieces of time, though it outdoes shots for so-called style. 

The film feels like an indulgent 1980s fantasy film grounded in reality where the second half plays like the movie under siege, but there are plenty of comedic antics. In both parts

The problem with the film comes from the heart of the film, which is that Jackie Chan’s character is a great detective who seems very clumsy, daydreams a lot, and always seems to be after sexy women. He is helping to take care of his partner’s daughter. At first, it’s like they have more of an uncle-niece relationship at times, it seems like she wants to make him jealous by going on vacation with a cousin so that it may be a romance on her part towards him, but he also seems to show a certain jealousy when other men are interested in her and this seems to be part of the romantic comedy elements were a force of the movie.

it’s made all the more inappropriate seeming as the girl he is taking care of looks like a teenager as well as the girl whose case he is working and he is noticeably older than both of them so seeing him try to romance them in certain scenes feels very uncomfortable.

The film feels more trashy than the star’s usual fare. They will try to maintain innocence and say it’s all in good fun as it is a stupid comedy that’s more physical and less action and more stunts action. There is also more comedy and less stunt work.

There is no nudity but fixated on the female costar’s cleavage and body, and finding funny things to do with them and come across more as character traits than an actual character.  As there are many scenes where he seems, the female characters are groped for comedic effect that comes across as a little bit more exploitative. 

It also makes life seem cheap. As there is tons of abuse towards women played off more as comedic. This is horrible especially when the Supporting female characters here are actually more fun and funny than the main actor.

The film is a screwball comedy without a good script. Even the villains henchman here seem to be wearing uniforms that look like costumes left over from V: THE MINISERIES.

Again, at the halfway point, this movie turns into Under Siege, the dyslexic version. The second half of the film is better than the first half.

This seems like a role less significant for Jackie Chan as it seems or feels like almost anyone could have played it because of physical and comedic skills were why he was called and offered him a chance to play an actual role outside of his usual persona. 

It’s fascinating how ridiculous this film is especially anytime. Visual effects are used that feel more like a live-action comic book. 

It has strange bits of humor like a scene that has a street fighter-themed fight with various characters playing the video game characters. Do video game antics and sound effects. That comes across more as a parody.

Grade: C 

DEATH ON THE BEACH (1991)

Directed By: Enrique Gomez Vadillo

Written By: Enrique Gomez Vadillo and Carlos Valdemar

Cinematography: Santiago Navarrette

Editor: Carlos Puente

Cast: Sonia Infante, Andres Bonfiglio, Rodolfo De Anda, Antonio Eric, Humberto Lobato, Angela Alatriste, Martha Gema, Ileana Higueras 

The son of a wealthy businesswoman returns home from boarding school. His mother, always busy with business and with her ambitious lover, realizes that her son suffers from being a homosexual. Having killed a teacher who abused him, the trauma makes him keep killing.


This film was made in 1991 but watching it it feels older though it totally fits both the 1970s and 1990s as a way of creation as the film is at the heart, a thriller, but also a kind of LGBTQ plus romance of sorts. Definitely more of a cult film.

We are mildly sympathetic to the killer in this film, as it’s not a spoiler, but his character was raped by his teacher at a boarding school, and he secretly enjoyed it, which is how he found out that he was a homosexual, but also is repressed that he can’t readily admit it to his mother But is looking for someone to love and share his life with, but is so repressed that he kills those around him or also gay or threat to him

To try to fool the audience because the opening credits are of the lead female Sonia Infante swimming around her pool and staying in a state of toplessness until a man comes we find out is her soon-to-be husband and basically, they frolic together, and this opening scene and throughout the film that is shot like soft horn Haze

The stepfather seems like a Spanish right, Robert Mitchum. He looks and we don’t really know his deal because at first, it seems like he is a gold digger, but he seems like he does but also odds with the stepson, but the mother keeps trying to deny homosexuality Homosexuality is treated like some kind of disease or mental illness throughout this film. We’re having the main character be a serial killer of sorts doesn’t help.

It’s so hard to believe that the stepfather is the one who suspects him of it while also setting up a house fall who is meant for more things than he is presented with at the beginning 

In all of this, the sun finally finds a companion to confide in who has a girlfriend who I guess has always been straight most of his life but being a European he’s sexually the son is his friend and has treated him so well and this is his honeymoon to a certain extent or least bachelor party to get all his players and king out an intense romance between the two

The film has full frontal nudity of men and women, thing is that it represents a negative stereotype of homosexuals, but it also makes them the main character and gives representation at a time when it wasn’t really shown also the movie is a bee movie that is so ridiculous that you cannot believe The sun is getting away with all these murders, except for the fact that his mother is rich, but she even believes all of his excuses of all these deaths around ridiculous, especially when the murders are so blatant and done at the drop of a hat without any real thought or planning?

That is the beauty of the film is that it is such a bee movie and so ridiculously over the top, but for the most part, seriously it achieves the true beauty of being self-aware and not at the same time with questionable politics and motives that make the film, if not troubling at times And wondering how takes this film that it is obvious yet comic 

In the end, this is a fun yet bad film that has a ridiculous. The third act and ending despite it being bananas from the beginning Harkins back to a certain time no offer representation of good and bad. 

watching the film, you could tell that this was a bit homophobic and going into certain stereotypes while trying to have an open mind, though villainizing and having sympathy but also gives a backstory and understanding, even though throughout the film pretty much there is no set. Everything is said out of the open and no one seems to have, a sensor when it comes to their thoughts and saying them. it seems a vision of a homosexual story through a straight male gaze. 

Grade: C