EDDINGTON (2025)

 

Written & Directed By: Ari Aster

Cinematography: Darius Khondji

Editor: Lucian Johnston 

Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Emma Stone, Austin Butler, Pedro Pascal, Deidre O’Connell, Michael Ward, Cameron Mann, Clifton Collins Jr., Luke Grimes, William Belleau, Amelie Hoeferle 

In May of 2020, a standoff between a small-town sheriff and mayor sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in Eddington, New Mexico.

————————————————————————

This film Is A Modern Western Fever Dream America Desperately Needs to Talk About

Eddington is one of those films that walks into the cultural conversation like it owns the place. It’s loud, strange, earnest, paranoid, poetic—and you immediately know you’ll be arguing about it for months. It’s a genuine conversation starter, which is why I will gently advise: go in knowing as little as possible.

That said… one has have to talk about it, and talking about it requires spoilers. So consider this your warning, your permission slip, and your parachute.

This is a film that is hard to describe or even evaluate on one review. There are so Many things going o. Where even the littlest action, decision or even detail means more by the ends 

This is a movie that is, by design, divisive. A cinematic Rorschach test. Some viewers will love it. Some will hate it. Some will think they “get” it. Some will swear others don’t “get” it. And others still will simply sit there wondering why the film dared to poke at politics, identity, and American mythmaking with a stick this sharp and this reckless.

But that’s also the point: Eddington isn’t here to soothe you. As it’s a midwest tapestry stitched with paranoia.

Set in a small Midwestern town, the film plays like a modern western that swaps out the black-hatted outlaw for pandemic panic, online conspiracy, fractured identity politics, and the creeping realization that the “outside world” has already invaded long before anyone notices.

The first half feels deceptively simple. small tensions, personal feuds, social anxietie, but those threads keep tightening, knotting, and snapping until the town erupts, not because of a single villain, but because absolutely everyone is too wrapped up in their own drama to actually talk to each other.

It’s a portrait of America where communication has been replaced with suspicion. Where rivalries escalate past all reason. Where every person is starring in their own private conspiracy thriller. Even as the real threats crawl right through the cracks.

By the end, the film begins to resemble a Donald-Trump-era conspiracy fantasy… but with absolutely none of the idol worship or flattery. It’s the nightmare version: the idea that paranoia itself becomes prophecy. That fear becomes religion. That enemies, real or imagined materialize because characters are too busy reenacting their own ideological theater to notice the world burning around them.

The satire bites hard, aiming squarely at both political sides. The left -idealistic, moralizing, eager to be on “the right side of history” treats the town’s homeless man like an inconvenience. The right – fearful, defensive, easily provoked, treats him like a problem to eliminate. And everyone, absolutely everyone, is a hypocrite.

Young “progressive” locals demand justice yet lecture the Black deputy on what he should feel, while he’s simply trying to do his job and survive in a town that barely allows upward mobility. Romantic tensions reveal that personal motives are often far murkier than the ideologies people hide behind. Friendships fracture. Morals bend depending on who’s watching. It makes you wonder if the characters truly feel this or if it’s just performative social justice because that is the trend and what’s popular. Also giving them a sense of rebellion that youth seems to always desire against the aged or old ways. 

By the end the deputy has his own scars and learns the lessons his ancestors had to deal with and learn. Yet still go on day to day in pain. Never being able to forget the injustices. 

The virus infiltrates. Fear infiltrates. Antifa is said to infiltrate. But really, it’s paranoia doing all the infiltrating.

Yes, this is very much an Ari Aster film, though it’s looser, less mannered, and more sprawling than Midsommar or Beau Is Afraid. It’s a messy beauty, intentionally so. The visuals are gorgeous but less overtly stylized; the tone more erratic, more chaotic, more human. It’s a modern western of moral collapse 

If Beau Is Afraid punished its lead for everything, Eddington punishes its lead for exactly one thing: believing revenge is righteousness.

And his downward spiral, though tragic, is compelling in a mythic, moral-fable way.

The third act is where Aster lights the fuse and lets the whole film detonate.

Chaos reigns. Consequences catch up. Characters pay the ultimate price. not for their politics, but for their blindness.

Eddington refuses to pick a side because it’s too busy examining how people weaponize sides in the first place. It understands that humans are more complicated than the slogans they carry or the propaganda they share. Ideology becomes performance. Performance becomes identity. Identity becomes a trap.

And through all this, the film insists that sometimes the greatest horror story is simply a group of people refusing to truly see one another.

So that the film is about flawed people, not slogans 

Is the film perfect? No. Is it Ari Aster’s best? No 

But Is it vital? Absolutely. It’s ambitious, jagged, clunky in spots, occasionally too big for its own frame, but it’s also alive—full of ideas, full of danger, full of that rare cinematic bravery that demands viewers think rather than simply consume.

The major supporting actors. Some of the film’s biggest names. Emma Stone, Austin Butler, Pedro Pascal all appear briefly but meaningfully, flashing like caution signs in the town’s slow-motion meltdown. Their presence reinforces how everyone is part of the problem, part of the confusion, part of the noise.

Joaquin Phoenix’s acting here is more internal than external and it’s his show the ringleader to reign in. Even if by the end he is one of the acts rather then being in control. Especially the way he wants or hopes he is. 

I could try to link the various theories and interpretations that this film presents but that is for the viewer to discover for themselves and read into,  no I’m not writing that to say that I don’t

Have any or see any. I think half the interest and entertainment isn’t Always what is happening on the screen but how you or an audience reacts to it. 

I can see why some might dislike the film

Though most admit they don’t like the film but It’s 

Not a bad film as it does make you think. As it tries to be a satire that is less comedic and more political exposing the chaos of the pandemic playing out all the theories, fears and politics in a small town and making it come across as a modern western due to it’s Location and strange mix of morals and anti-hero To show that we are all flawed in some way

As when the lead does what he thinks is right out of revenge but leads to his own and others downfall that ends up with him being heroic and paying the ultimate price 

The films shows flaws I. Both sides as it is more interested in showing characters and how they can be lead astray but also victims of circumstance and survival at times 

Who are we to hate because things don’t

go the way they are supposed to or are expected to. People are people not slogans and propaganda that they might brandish or share and at the heart of all these movements the leaders are open to oversight and more interested in the message and less the followers or even supposed victims 

This is not a pass/fail film. It’s a what did this make you feel? film. A what did you see that I missed?film.

The entertainment isn’t just the plot. it’s the audience reaction, the interpretations, the debates in the parking lot afterward.

Eddington is a human horror story disguised as a political satire disguised as a western disguised as a pandemic drama.

It’s a film about how easily we fracture under pressure, how quickly we fall into narrative traps, and how dangerous it is when no one is listening.

Not my favorite Aster film… but maybe the one most urgently worth discussing.

Grade: B+

KIND OF KINDNESS (2024)

Directed By: Yorgos Lanthimos 

Written By: Yorgos Lanthinos and Effhimis Filippou 

Cinematography: Robbie Ryan 

Editor: Yorgos Mavropsaridis 

Cast: Jesse Plenmons, Emma Stone, Hong Chau, Willem Dafoe, Margaret Qualley, Hunter Schaffer, Mamoudou Athie, Joe Alwyn, Yorgos Stefanakos 

a triptych fable, following a man without choice who tries to take control of his own life; a policeman who is alarmed that his wife who was missing at sea has returned and seems a different person; and a woman determined to find a specific someone with a special ability, who is destined to become a prodigious spiritual leader.


Fresh off the heels of his critically acclaimed Hollywood films director Yorgos Lanthimos seems to be Going back to his more experimental type of films bringing with him acclaimed actors.

On the one hand, I applaud him as he exposes more general audiences to experimental films and brings them a little more into the norm. As much as he can. Where he not only actually challenges audiences and their expectations. As well as providing material that is deeper and more thought-provoking than most. Letting them make their own minds on the stories and not hand-holding them throughout.

One only wishes that one could say it feels worth it. While one can enjoy the dynamic aspects and camerawork of his filmmaking. Though have never been the biggest fan of his early experimental work. There always seems to be a challenging renegade spirit to his work. 

Here he presents three different tales that have not only the same cast but the character of RMF to connect them. Essentially a minor character but revolving around various characters. Each tale has a theme, but all seem to include toxicity and love of some kind 

The first story revolves around a character 

Reliant on a boss so much in aspects of their life. What happens when true freedom is offered to them and not know how to survive because we have become so dependent on them. Some might say this story is an analogy of capitalism.

The second story involves a cop whose wife has gone missing at sea and he is not taking it well. Once his wife is back he is overjoyed but becomes convinced something is off and that she is an imposter. We see him seemingly break down as he tries to convince others she is not who she says she is. This story like the one before it revolves around control how comfortable one might be with it and what happens when they are not in control. It also shows how relationships can work and break once your partner makes their own decisions and doesn’t fit the ideal anymore of their partner and how people will stay in an Avis or relationship in hopes of things going back to the way they used to be and are willing to practically sacrifice themselves to make the other happy. 

The third take involves a cult. The members believe in two leaders. Who they can only have sex with. Who are in search of a young woman who can bring the dead back to life. While one of the members keeps running into their ex-husband and daughter. Eventually kicked out one member believes they have found the miracle and then plays like a tragic comedy.

This one shows our reliance on others to make us feel whole and keep us safe give us some kind of meaning and how those who love us can easily break us or betray us for their own comfort and happiness. 

Throughout all do these tales the ensemble cast plays different characters. Some of the biggest names in the cast might be the star of one tale and then a minor character in another.

The title gives away the themes, of how there are different kinds of kindness and how they can be used for good and how some use them to hurt others or have power.

As a whole, these short films coming together make an alright feature. Though separately they might not be as strong or powerful and might either come off as pretentious or offer ideas the audience already knows.

The cast is clearly having fun and in their element throughout. One only wishes it was mutual for the audience. As the film goes along the shocking moments become defining and also expected. It finds the director and cast more at play than offering anything truly strong or solid. It doesn’t seem wasteful, though it doesn’t come off as anything more than a healthy budgeted experiment.

I seemed to have not enjoyed it as much as others, especially critics.

Grade: B- 

LA LA LAND (2016)

 

Written & Directed By: Damien Chazelle
Cinematography: Linus Sandgren
Editor: Tom Cross
Music By: Justin Hurwitz 

Cast: Ryan Gosling, Emma Stone, John Legend, Rosemarie DeWitt, J.K. Simmons, Finn Wittrock, Callie Hernandez, Jessica Rothe, Sonoya Mizuno, Valarie Rae Miller, Tom Everett Scott 

Aspiring actress serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and jazz musician Sebastian scrapes by playing cocktail-party gigs in dingy bars. But as success mounts, they are faced with decisions that fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.


This is a big Hollywood epic with an indie sensibility.

The film Might be overpraised by some but doesn’t mean the film is without merits.

There haven’t been really too many musicals lately this one came along and is more the classical with having a more avant garde way of telling the story but in a more mainstream way of advancing story and having an emotional core with the songs. Instead of them being an extravaganza meant to be show stoppers and really just there to dazzle.

Though the movie can easily be written off as trying to tell It’s story in a classic mode that hasn’t been sued in a while and going. For a certain glory. This film feels like it can only be told in this way

As the film Shows a love of the genre as well as playing by the rules and adding a spin of it’s own. As it Also has a kind of successful A STAR IS BORN type story. Only without the heaviness of a tragic ending. Though it does have it’s own tragic ending of sorts.

The ending is tragic in that it offers up some hope at first before letting the wind out of the soaps of the audience. That reminds the audience of the reality vs fantasy sequence in 500 DAYS OF SUMMER. It’s beautifully and so emotional that every note feels like a moment. Though it is meant to pull on your heartstrings and have an emotional reaction yourself which makes it all the more memorable. As the characters and we Review and look back over all the decisions might they have had a chance to go another way. Not to mention a future that could have been.

An homage to musical while being one itself though owing more to European ones which they share the theme of success but tragedy choosing to show the peril Of the relationship that goes with individual success the difference between art and commerce with a kind of ending that fools us with that could have been making the wound hurt more.

Which is where it doesn’t Feel as familiar in the second half the after the happily ever after even if it involves a character who kind of appropriates culture though more to a degree but that is more subjective than anything a romance at least. Though through it all the film Wears it’s influences and even if knowing where it is going leaves surprises or at least attempts them. Which keeps the audience on it’s tied and excited as the film goes along.

This shows A love of film and a great love story that might remind many of theirs or at least a dream one they wish they had. A reminder of CinemaScope and technicolor musicals of all ages. As it is hopeful and energetic but shows struggling and settling then finding fame and success and it’s painful aftermath. That while great for the individual is not healthy for a relationship. As one might have to settle or give up their dreams and drive for the other to prosper.

A story that shows of old Hollywood and jazz, A throwback simpler classy times. There is Nothing vulgar about it. Which is becoming increasingly rare in movies these days. At least when it comes to movies that have a certain pedigree.

The Dancing is noteworthy. It not phenomenal to show the characters are human and normal. The magic you feel and how strong those emotions or how you wish they would be. The First half feels like a broadway musical almost as it gets closer to reality and more serious less and less musicals

The film Feels like a fair sided testament. The film is infectious and makes you want to watch More as it stays inventive.

The filmmakers previous films all have music or revolve around it. So that you can tell he has a passion for it and in his storytelling here it is goes hand and hand with the story. As This feels more a continuation of GUY AND MADELINE IN THE PARK his first film. WHIPLASH his next film takes place around music and passion but also seemed more dramatic, destructive and dark.

This film Almost feels like a film stitched together from your favorite parts of songs and movies the scenes you fast forward or rewind over and over to get to. Though under a different or new coat. It owes a deep debt definitely to it’s influences like YOUNG GIRLS OF ROCHEFORT and UMBRELLAS OF CHERBOURG

Grade: A-

ZOMBIELAND: DOUBLE TAP (2019)

Directed By: Ruben Fleischer

Written By: Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick & Dave Callahan

Cinematography: Chung-Hoon Chung Editor: Chris Patterson & Dirk Westervelt

Cast: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin, Rosario Dawson, Luke Wilson, Thomas Middleditch, Zoey Deutch, Avan Jogia, Victoria Hall, Victor Rivera 

A decade after their first adventure, the zombie-bashing team of Columbus, Tallahassee, Wichita, and Little Rock move to the American heartland. Here, they face off against evolved zombies, fellow survivors, and the growing pains of their own makeshift family.


Just like the first film, this isn’t really a horror film more like an action-comedy that has horrific elements or a more horror background.

This sequel definitely feels less than inspired as the main cast does come back for the sequel but throughout they all look disgruntled or miserable to be here. Even though one would like to think at least they would be back to enjoy each other’s company, but it seems like everyone is more here for only here for a bigger paycheck.

The only time they seem genuinely like they like each other is in a moment towards the end when coming together in what looks like certain doom 

Though this film Came about after a failed pilot for a Zombieland television series with a different cast. Which is where Even the parody or actors Luke Wilson and Thomas Middleditch playing bizarro

Versions of Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg’s character come off as cheap weak humor. Though seem like they would be the replacements of the actors either choose not to come back or the straight to streaming sequel or if they couldn’t have gotten the actors for the first film.

Woody Harrelson seems to be the only one here who seems to give a damn or bother showing any excitement. Maybe as he finally gets a love interest and not as lovey Dovey as Jesse Eisenberg’s romance from the first film.

Even though Abigail Breslin character goes on her own throughout the film And the characters are trying to find her. The film still gives her the least amount of screen time and attention as her character just seems to be going through a teenage rebellion.

The film pretty much continues the adventures of the characters and adds very little so that it would seem more of the same. Except at least in the first film the story seemed at least creative. Here it feels like the movie and script are running on fumes.

Zoey Deutch is a newcomer to the film franchise and provides the only distraction and is the only truly funny thing about the movie. As she brightens up her scenes as a dumb blonde stereotype. As she reminds me of Valeria Andrews character in the Ashton Kutcher movie JUST MARRIED where she was one of the truly bright spots of that movie and she only really had a few scenes. 

Zoey Deutch does a lot of heavy lifting on her scenes and makes the film almost entertaining. Even though she supposed fate is telegraphed and predictable. When she is absent it Feels like they are struggling to come up with material as it goes along. Maybe an excuse to expose more of Eisenberg’s Character’s rules and theories. As well as expand them

The ending is pretty fun could have used that ingenuity earlier especially the credits sequence. 

While watching this film I kept having thoughts just as I had when watching THE WALKING DEAD.  How do they have power? Fireworks attract zombies but not lights? No defense against zombies except gates in this so-called Babylon. There is always a suspension of disbelief but one  Shouldn’t be wondering these things as you are watching it, though the film does have it’s moments. Which are mostly stylistic. This seems to be one of the only ways the director seems to want to enliven the sequel and set it apart. As with each new film he makes even outside of the franchise usually has a few visually striking scenes where you can admit you have never seen that before.

Such as the fight within the Elvis HEARTBREAK HOTEL. Which is an action sequence that manages to feel epic in such a small amount fo space that seems to depend on excellent choreography. The other sequence is the ending when forced to fight an overabundance of zombies with no guns. 

In the end, the sequel is a majorly disappointing feeling like it was made only because of demand not necessarily well thought out or organic. 

Grade: D+

LA LA LAND (2016)

lalaland2

Written & Directed By: Damien Chazelle
Cinematography: Linus Sandgren
Editor: Tom Cross
Music By: Justin Hurwitz 

Cast: Ryan Gosling, Emma Stone, John Legend, Rosemarie DeWitt, J.K. Simmons, Finn Wittrock, Callie Hernandez, Jessica Rothe, Sonoya Mizuno, Valarie Rae Miller, Tom Everett Scott 

Aspiring actress serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and jazz musician Sebastian scrapes by playing cocktail-party gigs in dingy bars. But as success mounts, they are faced with decisions that fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.

Continue reading “LA LA LAND (2016)”

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (2012)

amazingspiderman

Directed By: Marc Webb
Written By: James Vanderbilt & Alvin Sargent & Steve Kloves
Story By: James Vanderbilt
Based on Characters Created By: Stan Lee & Steve Ditko
Cinematography: John Schwartzman
Editor: Alan Edward Bell, Michael McCusker & Pietro Scalia 


Cast: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Denis Leary, Martin Sheen, Sally Field, Irrfan Khan, C. Thomas Howell, Campbell Scott, Embeth Daviditz, Chris Zylka, Amber Stevens, Tia Texada, Hannah Marks, Vincent Laresca 


After Peter Parker is bitten by a genetically altered spider, he gains newfound, spider-like powers and ventures out to save the city from the machinations of a mysterious reptilian foe.

Continue reading “THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (2012)”

BIRDMAN OR (THE UNEXPECTED VIRTUE OF IGNORANCE) (2014)

birdman

Directed By: Alejandro González Iñárritu
Written By: Alejandro González Iñárritu, Nicolas Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris & Armando Bo
Based On The Writings of: Raymond Carver
Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki
Editor: Douglas Crise & Stephen Mirrione

Cast: Michael Keaton, Edward Norton, Emma Stone, Amy Ryan, Zach Galifianakis, Andrea Riseborough, Naomi Watts, Lindsay Duncan, Merrit Wever, Damian Young, Paula Pell, Bill Camp, Stephen Adly Gurgis

Riggan Thomas, once known quite well to movie theater goers as an iconic super hero called “The Birdman” had recently turned down a third installment of the franchise. Now washed up, he attempts to reinvent himself as a director by staging a new retelling of a classic Broadway dramatic play called “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love”. The events leading up to the Saturday night premiere prove to be one disaster after another as the original lead actor is injured while on set and Riggan scrambles to find a replacement, but the replacement proves to be exactly who he needs – a method actor who takes the job way too seriously. But Riggan has a hard time juggling between the set, his replacement actor, his equally washed up daughter, and a host of other disasters that prevent a proper staging of the play. Meanwhile, a New York Times critic who Riggan has to woo threatens to shut down production of the play before it even starts with a scathing review of the dress rehearsal. Does Riggan have a hit on his hands or will he even make it to opening night?

Continue reading “BIRDMAN OR (THE UNEXPECTED VIRTUE OF IGNORANCE) (2014)”

BATTLE OF THE SEXES (2017)

battleofthesexes

Directed By: Jonathan Dayton & Valerie Faris
Written By: Simon Beaufoy
Cinematography By: Linus Sandgren
Editor: Pamela Martin 


Cast: Steve Carrell, Emma Stone, Bill Pullman, Andrea Riseborough, Natalie Morales, Sarah Silverman, Elisabeth Shue, Martha MacIssac, Alan Cumming, Eric Christian Olsen, Fred Armisen, Mickey Sumner, Wallace Langham, Matt Molloy, Bridey Elliott, Chris Parnell, Mike Vogel, Tom Kenny, Jamey Sheridan 


In the wake of the sexual revolution and the rise of the women’s movement, the 1973 tennis match between women’s world champion and ex-men’s-champ and serial hustler Bobby Riggs was billed as the BATTLE OF THE SEXES and became one of the most watched televised sports events of all time, reaching 90 million viewers around the world. As the rivalry between King and Riggs kicked into high gear, off-court each was fighting more personal and complex battles. The fiercely private King was not only championing for equality, but also struggling to come to terms with her own sexuality, as her friendship with Marilyn Barnett developed. And Riggs, one of the first self-made media-age celebrities, wrestled with his gambling demons, at the expense of his family and wife Priscilla. Together, Billie and Bobby served up a cultural spectacle that resonated far beyond the tennis court, sparking discussions in bedrooms and boardrooms that continue to reverberate today.

Continue reading “BATTLE OF THE SEXES (2017)”

MAGIC IN THE MOONLIGHT (2014)

Magic-in-the-Moonlight-DI-1

Written & Directed By: Woody Allen
Cinematography By: Darius Khondji
Editor: Alisa Lepselter 


Cast: Colin Firth, Emma Stone, Marcia Gay Harden, Jacki Weaver, Simon McBurney, Eileen Atkins, Catherine McCormick, Erica Leerhsen Hamish Linklater, Ute Lemper

Stanley is a magician who has dedicated his life to revealing fraudulent spiritualists. He plans to quickly uncover the truth behind celebrated spiritualist Sophie and her scheming mother. However, the more time he spends with her, he starts thinking that she might actually be able to communicate with the other world, but even worse, he might be falling in love with her.

Continue reading “MAGIC IN THE MOONLIGHT (2014)”

IRRATIONAL MAN (2015)

irrationalman

Written & Directed By: Woody Allen
Cinematography By: Darius Khondji
Editor: Alisa Lepselter 

Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Emma Stone, Parker Posey, Ethan Phillips, Joe Blackely, Robert Petkoff, Sophie Von Haselberg

A new philosophy professor arrives on a small town campus near Newport, Rhode Island. His name, Abe Lucas. His reputation : bad. Abe is said to be a womanizer and an alcoholic. But what people do not know is that he is a disillusioned idealist. Since he has become aware of his inability to change the world, he has indeed been living in a state of deep nihilism and arrogant desperation. In class, he only goes through the motions and outside he drinks too much. But as far as sex is concerned, he is just a shadow of himself now: depression is not synonymous with Viagra! For all that, he can’t help being attracted to one of his students, pretty and bright Jill Pollard. He enters into a relationship with her which remains platonic, even if Jill would not say no to more. The situation remains unchanged for a while until, one day, in a diner, Abe and Jill surprise a conversation that will change the course of their lives dramatically…

Continue reading “IRRATIONAL MAN (2015)”