Tag: DRAMA

AFTERSUN (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Charlotte Wells
Cinematography: Gregory Oke
Editor: Blair McClendon

Cast: Paul Mescal, Frankie Corio, Celia Rowlson-Hall, Sally Messham

Sophie reflects on the shared joy and private melancholy of a holiday she took with her father twenty years earlier. Memories real and imagined fill the gaps between them as she tries to reconcile the father she knew with the man she didn’t…

This is a movie that presents a happy picture but hints at dismay and other things going on, on the sideline but they are never explained.

So throughout we get hints of something dismaying, but also it’s never quite explained to us. Which allows the audience to feed into or put whatever they feel into the story and make it more personal.

As the film stays what it presents itself as. A look at a father and daughter spending a holiday together at a resort. They bond and have a loving relationship. Except towards the end, they get into a bit of an argument and separate.

Where this will lead we aren’t quite sure but in the end seeing them together again we know they are alright.

In the film, we are never quite sure what happened after the horrific kiss. as we see the future somewhat and it appears we are looking back at memories and videos. We never quite are sure why she is watching these videos or what she is looking for or exactly what happened.

So Essentially it feels like we are watching moments and how they affect us though we have no idea where they are going so it is a bit abstract for us to make up the past and the future. As we watch all we know is that present.

Almost a snapshot, but it is a beautiful film with inventive shots at times. Such as instead of focusing on the actors focusing on their reflections on various objects. Ultimately the film is heartbreaking. It also fills you with a kind of joy.

Remembering when you loved it you loved your kids and everything was innocent and kind of perfect while the outside world looms. It’s one problem that you will have to deal with and encounter. For the time being you are in your own little world with your family and loved ones and that is all that matters 

They are mistaken for being siblings rather than father and child. Though that does show how young he is to be a father and the pressures that might present with little disappointments lien the resort not being as grand as advertised 

The film revels in these ambiguities and it’s another film that benefits from it is mostly taken from a child’s Point of view not fully but in pieces. This helps to explain that some of the camera work and angles are a bit obscured. 

This also allows us later on or after for us to realize that it’s impossible to totally reconstruct a memory perfectly. And that the daughter here can’t ever fully come into focus 

And it offers the universal wonder of looking back at certain moments in our lives and re-evaluating them. We’re what we remembered, better or worse we’re their clues other things were going on. 

The film offers a happy ending but no closure

Grade: B

AMSTERDAM (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: David O. Russell 
Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki
Editor: Jay Cassidy 

Cast: Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, John David Washington, Chris Rock, Zoe Saldana, Robert DeNiro, Rami Malek, Michael Shannon, Mike Myers, Timothy Olyphant, Anya Taylor Joy, Alessandro Nivola, Andrea Riseborough, Matthias Schoenaerts, Taylor Swift, Max Perlich, Ed Begley Jr, Colleen Camp 

In the 1930s, three friends witness a murder, are framed for it, and uncover one of the most outrageous plots in American history.

This film had so much promise, an all-star cast, and a period-piece comedy. Somehow it all went so wrong. 

As it is big everything about it is big, but limits the places it can go and at least acknowledges that people have other elements to their lives other than the main plot as a focus. 

Director David O. Russell always likes to keep his films somewhat unpredictable and lovely as the camerawork is usually styled yet fluid and there are so many characters floating around who play important roles. That you never quite know who is going to drop in and out. He seems to like organized chaos so that by the end that is when you really notice the style or the plan. As it comes to light.

He also usually gets actors to play parts in his films as the roles are usually off the wall or quirky enough. That it allows the actors more to play than to necessarily act.

When it comes to this film though everything seems off. Not in his usual way though. As the film wants to say something about modern society and politics. As well as race and class relations to a degree, but also wants to mix in comedic elements that feel slapstick yet the laughs never come and nor the comedy exactly.

Here half the minor roles are played by recognizable actors who you wonder why they are even in the film. Though one of those big names Taylor Swift provides the only noteworthy and truly funny jaw-dropping scene. That someone who is not a fan of hers might enjoy it a little too much. 

It doesn’t help that you have a love story among friends and colleagues. Yet no one has any chemistry and they say the lines so blankly that there is no emotion at all and no real reason to truly care about the characters. Even as the situations get zanier and a conspiracy forms. The film stays steady and slow. Where the only actor who seems like they could be interesting is Christian Bale who seems stranded in this movie. His romance with Zoe Saldana is cute and her character is short-changed. As this is the most appealing she has been on screen in quite some time. As the film seems desperate for his character to have a love story as it keeps shining a light on Washinton.s and Robie.s  

As even the film tries to paint a love triangle but it is more of a love story between the two and he is just close to them. If the film had incorporated more of the triangle of the two characters both in love with the woman or them all in love with one another. That would have kept the dynamic more interesting. 

The characters all seem like they deserve their own film. Even though they aren’t playing passionately. They have backstories that would certainly fit a better film or be better used in one.

By the end, this film is about a conspiracy and is played by a caper. Feels like it was much ado about nothing. By the end, only two characters falling in love is the only true change throughout. So that by the end you feel like you went through an endurance test. A well-meaning one but still a chore 

It’s focused as it wants to be a lot of things all at once. It wants to be angry but also soft. As it is paced at times like a screwball comedy but intended to stick and not just go by. It just feels very unfocused. Yet wants to include a lot of details

Grade: C-

MONEYBALL (2011)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Bennett Miller
Written By: Aaron Sorkin And Steve Zaillian 
Story By: Stan Chervin
Based on the book “MONEYBALL: The Art Of Winning An Unfair Game” by: Michael Lewis 
Cinematography: Wally Pfister
Editor: Christopher Tellefsen 

Cast: Brad Pitt, Jonah Hill, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Robin Wright, Chris Pratt, Stephen Bishop, Reed Diamond, Brent Jennings, Tammy Blanchard, Nick Searcy, Arliss Howard

Oakland A’s GM Billy Beane is handicapped with the lowest salary constraint in baseball. If he ever wants to win the World Series, Billy must find a competitive advantage. Billy is about to turn baseball on its ear when he uses statistical data to analyze and place value on the players he picks for the team.

This film feels like a classic story. It is told simply not in a flashy way with plenty of dramatic scenes and even leaves room for light humor. Though it is intricate in the details and methods it is told. 

It feels like a film that has confidence in itself and how important it is. Whereas for the audience your enjoyment of the film matters in your interest in the subject and even the sport of baseball. As the film feels strong and partially nostalgic about the feeling of baseball and what it represents for some but also represents the players who seemingly

Give their all even when they might have run out of what makes them special, but also by making it more about numbers and probability. While trying to humanize these players it also undercuts them as at times liabilities more than anything. 

Why is it that baseball is the most respected sport when it comes to movies? Even though it is the sort that had a public cheating scandal in its heyday? As it strangely seems to represent Americana. As it has always seemed to be around and played?

Jonah Hill underplays In his role showing he can be quite effective without really doing much and more letting the character stand out for his skills rather than his behavior or words.

Bennet Miller behind the camera directing is always a joy. As he always seems to disappear and once he comes back around to making another film it stands out in many good ways. As they always seem more prestige than anything else. Good but they seem to lack passion or too much emotion. Here he has another home run. 

As a director, he tends to be very atmospheric. Especially when it comes to a consistent tone. As he seems to seek to say so much. While seemingly doing very little but it feels bigger. It’s hard to believe he only came onto this project after Director Steven Soderbergh left the project. 

This is one of Brad Pitt’s better performances where he seems to be in a role later in his career. As in the role, he plays it as more neutral, cocky, and as much of a show-off as he has done in the past. Here he doesn’t have to rely on looks, personality, or charm. 

The cast is full of heavy hitters who never let the film or the material down.

As this film is a true story it doesn’t have a storybook ending. But even as it is downbeat it is a quietly satisfying one. 

It not only takes you behind the scenes of the organization but also a great story with real characters going through inner turmoil. Though they stay in check of their emotions, you can read the drama clearly on their faces and in their eyes. 

The story is all about the details that shape and define it. 

GRADE: A

JEFF OF THE CINEFILES & UNFINISHED BUSINESS: HALL OF FAME – FILE #0071: SIDEWALK STORIES (1989)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Charles Lane 
Cinematography: Bill Dill 
Editor: Charles Lane and Ann Stein 

Cast: Charles Lane, Nicole Alysia, Ellia English, Edie Falco, Toni Ann Johnson, Bill Sage, Ed Kershen, Luis Ramos, Tanya Cunningham, Attila Hoosier, Michael Baskin, Robert Clohessy, 

Nearly silent comedy filmed in black and white follows a street artist, who rescues a baby after her father was murdered. The artist then sets off to find the mother, but has to first learn how to care for the child. Ultimately he ends up in a horse drawn chase of the murderers.

This film is memorable for what it sets out to achieve and what it doesn’t

Although meant to be a silent picture and a homage to the films of Charlie Chaplin it switches the script by not only being feature-length with side stories or scenes that all serve the intimate narrative. 

The only time there is dialogue is at the end seemingly giving a voice to the voiceless homeless characters he has found himself arm around as a street artist taking care of a random child who has found him evicted and amongst the city’s homeless

The film is a family affair as the little girl he takes care of is his real-life daughter and the film is truly about their relationship and bond, a kind of parental love story of sorts. Which makes it all the more personal.

Even though the film has the elements of romance a love story and even sex and nudity briefly and in the end more in the form of a fantasy 

It also ends up being a time capsule of sorts of new york and particularly manhattan around 1989 the streets and sights are familiar and magical like seeing someone you are familiar with at a certain age and getting to see their high school yearbook photos 

It overstretches It’s initial bounds as it is an artistic experiment and homage but is also made personal and not from the type of person we are used to even if it is a role that fits and a film that could have easily been a sensation for a bit and disappeared this film always seems to pop up and be discovered and restored to make sure it lasts over the years 

While not as funny or physically dexterous as Buster Keaton or Charlie Chaplin. Writer/director Charles Lane makes an impression as the film isn’t Made entirely for laughs or drama but to tell a story of characters and entertain. Not just provide sight gags. So while not for everybody expecting the most out of every sight gag or comedic setup. If given a chance it is rewarding and can be effective for 

It also hits home more as we have never seen this done from a person of color’s point of view. So it’s not only centered around a class distinction and prejudice but also a racial one. Allowing the story to be presented around not only an urban landscape but characters who reveal themselves to be identifiable and want the same things we all do.

Ahead of the curve as he is a struggling  Street artist whose sales pick up once he has the child in his possession as her scribbles far outsell any of his original and better artwork. As sometimes it is all about the presentation of art over skill that sometimes helps make the sale. 

A time when films could be risky and experimental and allowed to find an audience. Where it felt more like an artist at work 

With modern sensibilities, it took a little while to get into and onto the film’s wavelength but once you are it offers nothing but gems along the way. As it is an expose of how to pay homage it uses an ancient language or style of sorts and still Makes something personal, especially art out of it 

Supposedly Disney almost remade the film in color and with sound starring Tom Hanks. They offered Writer-director Charles Lane the chance to remake it. He had no interest in remaking the film and Tom Hanks eventually turned down the studio’s offer to star in the film. Even though he did enjoy the original. 

Grade: B

CRITICAL THINKING (2020)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: John Leguizamo 
Written By: Dito Montiel 
Cinematography: Zach Zamboni 
Editor: Jamie Kirkpatrick

Cast: John Leguizamo, Michael Kenneth Williams, Rachel Bay Jones, Jorge Landeborg Jr., Corwin C. Tuggles, Angel Bismark Curiel, Jeffry Batista, Will Hochman, Zora Casebere, Ramses Jimenez 

Miami – 1998. Poverty, broken families, and a prejudiced system push underprivileged youth to the fringes of society. But for a magnetic group of teens, there’s a reprieve. A game where it’s not about where you come from, but how you play. That equalizer is chess. Mr. “T” Martinez, a chess militant and passionate coach, leads them to a completely foreign battlefield.

Wish one could say this film Is different than the many a teacher makes a difference but unfortunately though similarly based on a true story. It hits many familiar beats of the genre.

Though I will say this one is a little rougher around the edges than most and a lot of the drama and plot points are left hanging to a certain degree. Letting us see some change or some who were at each other’s throats at peace with one another.

Which might be frustrating for a viewer but leaves the story and film with some realism. As it doesn’t exactly tell us what happened to some stories or characters but it does offer an endpoint. Even while some scenes and conversations feel missing. 

The film isn’t cookie-cutter, but the audience knows what will happen for the most part as we just watch how the film Will get us there.

The film isn’t exploitative. This isn’t urban porn where there seems to be no hope and it is nice to see a movie and know a story where a person of color helps the diverse students towards a goal. Someone who knows what It’s Like in the neighborhoods and what it’s like to be discriminated against and undervalued.

The teacher helps them to learn lessons not exclusively teach it to them and gives them hope. He doesn’t necessarily save them, just guides them to their own salvation.

The cast keeps the film moving and sparkles. John Leguizamo in his directing debut. Co-stars as the teacher and shows a talent behind the camera. 

Grade: C+

LES MISERABLES (2019)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Ladj Ly
Written By: Ladj Ly, Giordano Gederlini and Alexis Manenti
Cinematography: Julien Poupard
Editor: Flora Vol Peldiere 

Cast: Damien Bonnard, Alexis Manenti, Djerbil Zonga, Almammy Kenoute, Issa Percia, Al-Hassan Ly, Steve Tientchau, Nizer Ben Fatem, Raymond Lopez, Luciano Lopez, Jaihson Lopez 

A cop from the provinces moves to Paris to join the Anti-Crime Brigade of Montfermeil, discovering an underworld where the tensions between the different groups mark the rhythm.

This film feels like a mixture of the films END OF TOUR and TRAINING DAY only set in France.

The film shows the hostility between the residents of a neighborhood and the corrupt cops who hassle, rob, and torture them. Until one day they decide to strike back. Some In the neighborhood are no innocents but they are not all bad and they are human beings, yet they are never treated like them.

The film has an intensity throughout that keeps you on the edge of your seat and offers viewers another picture of France different from the tourist attractions.

The film shows or sets in motion how a minor incident has huge repercussions. Especially when there has been a growing hostility underneath the community for so long.

The film is also a celebration of the country the characters love and how they are treated or mistreated by it. As the film’s cast is a melting pot of immigrants trying to settle into the country. While showing how a new generation learns and takes over from elders who are too passive and want to stand up for themselves to liberate themselves and demand respect. Which they do by taking action.

The film mostly takes place after the Incident in which the cops trying to work it out, end up butting heads with new partners who have different philosophies when it comes to police work. How things are supposed to be done versus how they must be done to have any effects 

How it affects cops and citizens both as the scary part for each of them. As well for us in the audience is that we never know what is going to happen. Each side is stressed to the breaking point.

On the streets, they have no choice but to beat each other up or snitch on one another for survival short of killing. 

As the police are their own gang against all others with a false sense of power, abuse, and loyalty that comes back to haunt them. As they stick together not out of loyalty but out of survival and duty. It offers a spellbinding ending. 

If you are into energetic and vivid street stories this might be the movie for you. As it shows the many injustices that citizens must go through just to survive. 

This feels like the film the recent release ATHENA was trying to be or have the same effect, only a bit more personal

GRADE: B+

BONES & All (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Luca Guadagnino
Written By: David Kajganich 
Based on the Novel By: Camille DeAngelis
Cinematography: Arsani Khachaturen 
Editor: Margo Costa 

Cast: Taylor Russell, Timothee Chalamet, Mark Rylance, Michael Stuhlberg, Andre Holland, Jessica Harper, Chloe Sevigny, Sean Bridgers, David Gordon Green, Ellie Parker, 

A story of first love between Maren, a young woman learning how to survive on the margins of society, and Lee, an intense and disenfranchised drifter, as they meet and join together for a thousand-mile odyssey that takes them through the back roads, hidden passages and trap doors of Ronald Reagan’s America. But despite their best efforts, all roads lead back to their terrifying pasts and to a final stand that will determine whether their love can survive their otherness.

This is a film where you can watch and read into what you believe. As that seems to be its purpose. 

As it shows what can be the life of an addict. As the characters aren’t exactly junkies as they can go through periods of time without feeding but they know sooner or later they will have to feed to an extent and can’t quit and it can’t go away. So you can look at it as a story of addiction to a degree. 

This would explain why most are drifters and look trashy.

Though it is also a story of loneliness as they can detect one another and seem to need or desire to be around one another. Though the can’t completely trust one another. Though for little excursions they aren’t completely monsters or even vampires because at least as a vampire you have an epic weakness but it comes with supernatural powers. A kind of trade-off and a slice of life.

Though also as a predator and getting closer to their victims they have to play roles and have to invent and invest themselves in their lives. So that they get a glimpse into other’s lives as do we in the audience and have something to take away from it all, but also living a certain life and adventures for a while.

It’s no surprise the film is based on a young adult novel. At heart, it is a coming-of-age story of a girl who is 17 and is introduced to a world she has no training in and has to survive for herself through. Discovering the world is only a different one than most of us are used to. She also meets her first love and for a chunk of the film, we see their romance. Where they need one another to survive and she learns from him how to manage that life 

It’s another film for director Luca Guadagnino to present a forbidden love story or an unorthodox one here. 

It doesn’t eroticize violence or even sex. While there are both in the film. There isn’t an abundance of either. There are plenty of emotions and plenty of stand-alone scenes of suspense. As this film works in that way. There are some great scenes and the rest of the film is what you have to go through to get to them and inform them more.

The whole cast is superb and as always Mark Rylance Steals the movie. As the closest to a villain, the film has thought he comes across more as disturbed, sad and lonely. Though a one-scene cameo from Michael Schulberg is also a show stopper.

Though at times it does feel less random when it comes to the supporting cast and more like scenes that have been designated for guest stars that are important for the overall story, but still a little glad standing or too planned and it 

The two leads Taylor Russell and Timothee Chalamet impress as a kind of 1980’s lovers on the run in the Midwest that might remind some of BADLANDS for all the landscapes and relationships. Only they aren’t that vicious. As the first half of the film at least gives some direction as she searches for information about her mother. Though after that the film isn’t aimless but focuses more on trying to figure out a future.

It’s a film of a certain time period but not about the time period. As it explores some of the cultures of the time without it being dependent purely on pop culture or exploring the events of the time period when it takes place 

I can’t say I loved the film, but it is a film That challenges an audience not necessarily with shocks or endurance, but by not giving them what they want or stowaway. Not what they expect and offering a different point of view rather than the popular or most obvious one 

Which one tends to be a fan of as sometimes you feel like you are in on it. If you know what to expect or an experience that you know will challenge or upset others around you. Only they have no ideas what they are in for 

How we all long to make connections and how when we do it feels so special and one of a kind as we have the same afflictions, passions, and desires that no one else can understand.

The way it is presented finds a kind of beauty in a type of the ordinary and mundane of middle America. How something. So ordinary has extraordinary Bart things about it be it sights, land, mentality 

This is a film That if you pay close attention you will be able to find some kind of meaning for yourself and what the director is trying to present. Like the film purposely Challenges the audience It’s not cookie-cutter and is daring in It’s own right 

I give director Luca Guadagnino credit for trying to find beauty and substance throughout instead of making a typical or stylish horror film which it could have easily been. 

Grade: B-

THE TWO JAKES (1990)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed by: Jack Nicholson 
Written By: Robert Towne 
Cinematography: Vilmos Zsigmond 
Editor: Anne Goursaud

Cast: Jack Nicholson, Harvey Keitel, Meg Tilly, Madeline Stowe, Eli Wallach, Ruben Blades, David Keith, James Hong, Frederic Forrest, Richard Farnsworth, Tracey Walter, Joe Mantell, Perry Lopez, Rebecca Broussard, Van Dyke Parks

The sequel to Chinatown finds J.J. “Jake” Gittes investigating adultery and murder, and the money that comes from oil.

When the film was coming out I remember all the advertisements for the movie as a kid and always being impressed by its poster artwork. At the time I had never seen or heard of CHINATOWN the movie, but knew this was a sequel to something and really only interested because Jack Nicholson was in it and this was right after BATMAN and I remember him from the movie THE WITCHES OF EASTWICK. 

This sequel or update of the film classic CHINATOWN tries to continue the look and style.  It even has some returning cast members and characters. While employing some great character actors. So by all rights, the film should be noteworthy. As it has some great shows to fill.

Though it falls short very short that barely stands in the shadow of the previous film. It has a similarly twisty and twisted storyline that ends up being easy to figure out. Not to mention not as devastating. As it doesn’t pull the audience in, as much to care. It stays at arm’s distance. Not that the first film was all that warm and cuddly but it kept you on your toes. Especially when it came to the mystery. Here you just wonder how everything fits. 

This film also lacks any memorable scenes or revelations. It’s pretty mundane as it seems to try too hard. You want it to be better than it actually is. As the material is there it just feels misrepresented.

Madeline Stowe at first seems like she will be a femme fatale and be more important to the overall story. Though after awhile she seems to be here for no real reason other than as pretty dressing and more of a distraction.

The cast seems to be playing more into the mood of the movie. Which is always gloomy rather than characters. This film has no spirit really it stays flat and simple.

The film tries but it comes up as rather dull and just going through the motions. As it never takes a definite direction or offers any real distinctions.

Knowing this film had a full share of behind-the-scenes dramas between screenwriter Robert towns, Producer Robert Evans and star/director Jack Nicholson, Evans was upset after hoping to play the role of the other Jake Played by Harvey Keitel, but not only not being strong enough an actor but getting bad plastic surgery right before filming began. Then Robert towns dropped out of directing and the film was postponed until Nicholson took the reins of the project. As this was supposed to be the second of a trilogy. 

You can see what they were trying to do and attempting before time ran out, but this might have been better off than what could have been. 

Grade: C+

THE EVENING STAR (1996)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Robert Harling 
Based on the Novel by: Larry McMurtry
Cinematography: Don Burgess
Editor: David Moritz and Pricilla Nedd-Friendly 

Cast: Shirley McClaine, Juliette Lewis, Bill Paxton, Miranda Richardson, Mackenzie Astin, Scott Wolf, George Newbern, Jack Nicholson, Ben Johnson, Marion Ross, Donald Moffat, Jennifer Grant, China Kantner 

Continuing the story of Aurora Greenway in her latter years. After the death of her daughter, Aurora struggled to keep her family together, but has one grandson in jail, a rebellious granddaughter, and another grandson living just above the poverty line.

This is a follow-up to a classic that no one would have ever been completely satisfied with, but seemed to be made to satisfy an audience who might have been wondering what ever happened to the characters. Even though in the end it truly never needed to be made. 

It’s disappointing on many levels as a sequel and even as a movie. It just seems telegraphed to be melodramatic. 

The film takes us through what happened to the kids of Debra Winger’s character from TERMS OF ENDEARMENT. After having been raised by Their grandmother played by Shirley McClaine 

They all have their troubles though it seems like the daughter played by Juliette Lewis is the one she is having the most problems with. Her character and performance are way too over the top throughout. As one of the sons is serving a jail sentence and the other seems like a pushover. 

The film plays more like a melodramatic television movie. That has graphic undeserving sex scenes and plenty of bed-hopping. As McClane’s character seems irresistible to most men in the film. Giving her a younger lover who is also her psychiatrist and an adversary to compete with him. Until she learns the true reason for his attraction. Though it is nice to see Bill Paxton play a kind of romantic lead. with Scott wolf around more to be eye candy, Fantasy, and lover for all the ladies in the film

The film is over the top with sentimentality. That it seems as it gets towards the end it feels empty. 

The only truly interesting scene is Jack Nicholson’s cameo. That is when the film comes alive even for just a few moments. 

Even original writer and director James L. Brooks isn’t even back. It feels like the film tries to fit too many trends into the story that goes nowhere. 

This is a film aimed more at female movie fans and of course fans of the original. As the film feels like there is too much emotion on display.

While the main story seems to be to keep McClaine’s character constantly busy. While adding mini-aggressions for her to deal with. 

The film is missing the mixture of sharp comedy, drama, and tragedy that made the first film such a classic, noteworthy and one-of-a-kind. All this film does is remind us of how good the first film was and also desecrate Its memory with a big all-star cast. 

The film just feels secondhand with a pinch of nice dressing. 

Grade: D

THE KING OF MARVIN GARDENS (1972)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Bob Rafelson
Written By: Jacob Brackman
Story By: Bob Rafelson And Jacob Brackman
Cinematography: Laszlo Kovacs 
Editor: John F. Link II 

Cast: Jack Nicholson, Bruce Dern, Ellen Burstyn, Julia Anne Robinson, Benjamin “Scatman” Crothers, Arnold Williams, John Ryan, Sully Boyar, Josh Mostel 

A daydreamer convinces his radio personality brother to help fund one of his get-rich-quick schemes.

Will admit it took me quite some time to finally sit down and watch this film. Once I did it was probably brought upon by the director of the film. Which is a shame as this is a very powerful film. Not perfect but astonishing fun in what it achieves and also tries to do. 

Stories keep going on with no endings as they lead to another one. Yet never drop what came before. This film isn’t so much plot-oriented as character Oriented and the film allows for each of them to have their own little stories and dramas going along with one another and the narrative. 

Jack Nicholson here playing against type. As here he is more subtle, quiet, and sad as a character. He is the thinker of the two brothers. Even though they are both storytellers. Bruce Dern plays the more loud charismatic one. The problem is that they both tend to believe each other’s stories too much and soon find themselves in over their heads.

The film allows Jack Nicholson to show his range fully. 

Some might find this film slow or maybe even dull, but there are moments when the film comes alive. Though the other moments that are slower, bear more character building and help to build and showcase the characters’ dynamic. As well as illustrate the story. 

The film does offer an unexpected ending. Not much of it or the film is too predictable, at first but seems to like to throw misdirection.

Like Bruce Dern’s character. As none of the characters seems to really want to admit to what is happening or truly talk about it. 

This film is an increasing rarity of acting indulgence and taking chances with professional actors. Where they get to develop a character. As this film is more of a character study with a story to guide them to their fates. 

So that we can see their full emotional spectrum. As well as their true colors by the end. 

As the film is made up of simple moments that are lived in. 

A scheme that seems to be an ideal built of their mutual dreams. A palace or idea that they keep feeding into and want to control. A pipe dream to escape into to break up the monotony they are trying to escape.

Slowly getting seduced against better judgment and dragging two females along who are eye candy and intimates. Dangling sex and partnerships in front of the other brother, but have their own drama going on. So that the situation seems like a cult at times.

Ellen Burstyn’s Character slowly has a mental breakdown. As she realizes she might be being pushed aside for the younger model. 

The illusions drift, as both brothers are natural liars. Storytellers of some sort, one does professionally one does naturally to survive. Though all built on lies. Only one chooses to believe his own until the end. While others around them fall for it almost. As that is how charming and strong their devotion is.

The film is almost a ghost story. As these characters are free yet seem bound to their surrounding which is Atlantic City before it got renovated. So everything looks worn and beat down like the character’s Souls

An added bonus to The film is watching now legendary Actors we are used to seeing older in their younger days here.

Grade: B-