Tag: DRAMA

FOXFIRE (1996)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Annette Haywood-Carter
Written By: Elizabeth White
Based on the book By: Joyce Carol Oates
Cinematography By: Newton Thomas Sigel
Editor: Louise Innes

Cast: Angelina Jolie, Jenny Lewis, Hedy Burress, Jenny Shimizu, Sarah Rosenberg, John Diehl, Dash Mihok, Peter Facinelli, Chris Mulkey, Cathy Moriarty, Michelle Brookhurst, Elden Henson, Joel David Moore, Shiloh Strong

The story of five teenage girls who form an unlikely bond after beating up a teacher who has sexually harassed them. They build a solid friendship but their wild ways begin to get out of control

What really saves this film from being a clichéd teen girl film about finding your own inner strength and character, Is Angelina Jolie’s performance. If it had been seen by more people. It would have been a star-making role. She has a charismatic swagger in the film. Like a female James Dean that makes you desire her, Want to be like her, or just have her as a friend. She exudes coolness dripping it all over the screen.

I wish I could say such nice things about the rest of the film. The camera could just lay there except for some curious angles from time to time. The lighting of the film is annoying as there must be a certain brightness. No matter the time or location.

The acting by the rest of the cast is ok. The actresses all look too old to be playing teenagers. I was glad to see Jenny Lewis in the cast. One of my favorite Ex child actresses making a return to acting if only for a short while. (She would soon front the band RILO KILEY) She is one of the few actors I ever wrote a fan letter to as a kid (Alyssa Milano, Candace Cameron, and Soliel Moon Frye being the others) The only bad actor in the film is model Jenny Shimizu. There were rumors of her and Angelina hooking up. Which would play well into the homo-erotic subtext at the heart of this tale. It has that and a theme of independence. Defining yourself and not being afraid to stand up for yourself and of course feminism. This was a film that was rented many times by young female college students when I worked at tower video. It was considered a hot title.

I remember wanting to see it in theaters when I was in High School as I was already a fan of Angelina Jolie from CYBORG 2 and HACKERS. She enchanted me early in her career so that by the time she became popular and famous to mainstream audiences. My infatuation had already passed. I am partly still a fan. She is a good actress and irresistibly beautiful. In the ways at first, Hollywood seemed to shun her for her voluptuous body type and big lips that eventually became a Hollywood standard. She broke the mark and then set it. 

One misses the old Angelina Jolie. It was fun to see her pick various roles that showed a certain bravery and range but like most stars. Now she plays it more safely with projects and roles you would expect from her. She Is more poised now, Not the crazy more candid woman I remember. Know she is still capable of good films. Though after she won her Oscar she looked like she would be another victim of the Best Supporting Actress curse. That usually sees the winners without defined careers get high-profile roles that bomb commercially and critically and see their careers dry up. Since she picked mostly horrible films to be in, but then she found her groove not to mention her image in action films more or less.

The film is a fine rental to see Angelina’s Early work and a good feminist movie. Though it plays more like a small-town stage version of a much better work. Which might be due to the light budget and not-so-strong direction. Nor a necessarily strong script. Which feels more like an episode or short, rather than a full film

GRADE: C

BIRDS OF PARADISE (2021)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Sarah Adina Smith
Based on the Book by: A. K. Small
Cinematography: Shaheen Seth 
Editor: David Barker

Cast: Diana Silvers, Jacqueline Bisset, Kristine Froseth, Eva Lomby, Caroline Goodall, Daniel Camargo, Osiel Gouneo, Nassim Lyes, Stav Strashko 

Two girls at an elite Parisian ballet academy have their bond and bodies tested as they compete for a contract to join the company of the Opéra National de Paris.

This film is an adaptation of a novel. So that it’s not quite the Junior League BLACK SWAN rip off. that many have dubbed it.

Black Swan, for instance, seems to delve more into a kind of psychological breakdown, mixed with what might be supernatural. Here though it does deal with mental strength and breakdowns everything seems to stay in reality.

The film lends itself more to surreal imagery and scenes, though it keeps its feet and head on the ground. As the characters are dealing with many different issues from weight loss to the pressure of competition, deaths, and family, trying to prove themselves, and so on.

While we focus on the two main female characters who bond and our enemies at the same time. Where they are trying to each bond, yet have the upper hand while keeping secrets from one another that it becomes downright shocking who actually betrays who.

As they truly share everything even a bed, as there is only one in their room soon it is lovers’ feelings, emotions, truths, revealing themselves to each other, physically, and mentally sexually

Sure we have seen this before but somehow the film the state captivating Wild, never really reveals too much except about its two subjects.

As they seem to be the only warmth in the cold atmosphere of their situation, and the film. One character, who is warm, learns how to be cold, and the other who starts out cold, learns to become themselves, and thus thaw out.

Soon the film also becomes about identity and knowing oneself. As they both are on their own similar journeys in opposite directions, one ends up in a more purely sexual relationship, and the other ends up in route one that is not as sexual as usual for her, and involves more emotion.

It has beautiful dance sequences throughout and does not shy away from showing the physical cost of that and somewhat financial costs. It also helps that most of the cast is very eye-catching. Luckily, they are also all believable.

The film keeps her interested as it seems too deep. Every time you think you’ve gotten it figured out, even though there is still a ticking time clock on the ending. 

The ending doesn’t quite stick to the Landing, even though this is an anti-buddy drama.

That while it stays captivating, it just doesn’t have that cutthroat feeling enough to keep you enraptured.

Grade: C+

BOSTON STRANGLER (2023)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Matt Ruskin 
Cinematography: Ben Kutchins 
Editor: Anne McCabe

Cast: Keira Knightley, Carrie Coon, Chris Cooper, Alessandro Nivola, Rory Cochrane, David Dastmalchain, Peter Gerety, Robert John Burke, Ryan Winkles, Morgan Spector 

Loretta McLaughlin was the reporter who first connected the murders and broke the story of the Boston Strangler. She and Jean Cole challenged the sexism of the early 1960s to report on the city’s most notorious serial killer.

The film is well shot almost like an episode of the show MINDHUNTER. This might be why it feels like an R-rated tv-movie, but it lacks the drama, tension, and strength of that television show. 

In fact, it ends up representing those made for cable movies of the 1990s and 2000s. That was meant to be an event. where they got an all-star or established cast of recognizable names.

The movie plays like it’s own version of SHE SAID, though instead of tackling the Harvey Weinstein case. There is two female reporters who are looked down upon. One established and one rookie, cracking a case wide open that established reporters didn’t. As they are even the first to notice a pattern. 

Similar to that film we get to see their domestic lives while also tackling this story. Only here Kiera Knightley gets more screen time. As the rookie and how this case is also disrupting her domestic situation. 

The film short changes Carrie Coon a bit. As she is the mentor to Knightley’s character. We learn a bit less about her. She also doesn’t have as much screen time or moments. 

I can admit so far I have never been a fan of the movies based on this true crime case. Including the film THE BOSTON STRANGLER from 1968 

Directed by Richard Fleischer and starred Henry Fonda, Tony Curtis, and George Kennedy. Though that movie focused more on the killer and the police detectives. 

As a true crime movie, you could easily look up the case to discover the ending as well as the ins and outs. What the film does actually do successfully is offered up the surprise of the suspects and the realization of how many men got away with murder using the M.O. of the strangler, but when not being able to be linked with the other crime of the strangler were let go.

As towards the end, a character pretty much defines what the movie is about and sums up the point of this dramatization. Which is the changing times and realizations of things either kept hidden, quiet or never acknowledged. That was unfortunately showing that society could never go back to being so innocent. 

Though the film at least offers some hope for two female reporters challenging the status quo and finding courageousness and leading a way for females in the future. Even as they are pretty much the prey out there at that time. 

Grade: C+

CONFIDENCE (2003)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: James Foley 
Written By: Doug Jung 
Cinematography By: Juan Ruiz Amchia 
Editor: Stuart Levy 

Cast: Ed Burns, Rachel Weisz, Dustin Hoffman, Paul Giamatti, Brian Van Holt, Morris Chestnut, Louis Lombardi, Andy Garcia, Robert Forster, Robert Pine, Leland Orser, John Caroll Lynch, Luis Guzman, Donal Logue, Tony “Tiny” Lister, Franky G, Nicole Lenz 

Jake Vig is a consummate grifter about to pull his biggest con yet, one set to avenge his friend’s murder. But his last scam backfired, leaving him indebted to a mob boss and his enforcer.

I have never seen a film try so hard to be a modern version of THE STING.

The film offers likable quirky thieves and a handsome protagonist. Who is in over his head? An untrustworthy femme fatale and a big-name legendary actor playing the villain raise the stakes of the endeavor and make it seem like a challenge to the other actors to impress him or even hold the screen with him.

Then you get the requisite double crosses. Everyone is who they seem or say they are. I really wish I could have disliked this film. It ends up winning you over as long as you don’t look too deep. As it is a film that openly challenges you and wants the audience to overthink. So that while you are doing that it is sneaking stuff right by you.

Ed Burns is the lead con man. I will admit that when it usually comes to him in acting performances. He tries to play more laid-back characters but there is a certain arrogance in his performance that is perfect for the character he is playing here. Here he has his qualities actually work for him.

It helps that this film is stocked to help support him with so many character actors. Who he actually holds his own with. Under those conditions, you have to bring you a game and pray that some of their talent and charisma Rub off.

It’s hard to talk about this film and really have too much to say, when most of the enjoyment comes from watching these twists and turns in action.

It’s actually quite a charming film that is perfect to watch with an audience. Though you will probably only need to see it once. Since after that you know what it is all about. And not as much fun.

Watching it feels like you are playing a game. Once you watch it will All have the same outcome.

The film tries to be gritty but it comes off more as fascinating. As the film is much better than you would expect and is stylish to a degree, but feels like it is a victim of itself when it comes to the intelligence of the script. It thinks it’s smarter than it actually is. Even includes the will they or won’t they sexual tension between the con man leader and the new sexy recruit.

Watching this at the time it seemed part of a bunch of movies that were trying to be about con games or at least trying to fool the audience. That also seemed more in being self-promoting. This is worth a shot but more as entertainment than anything else.

GRADE: B-

CRIMES OF THE FUTURE (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: David Cronenberg 
Cinematography: Douglas Koch
Editor: Christopher Donaldson 

Cast: Viggo Mortensen, Lea Seydoux, Don Mckellar, Kristen Stewart, Scott Speedman, Nadia Litz, Lihi Kornowski, Tanaya Beatty, Weller Bungue 

As the human species adapts to a synthetic environment, the body undergoes new transformations and mutations. With his partner, Caprice, Saul Tenser, a celebrity performance artist, publicly showcases the metamorphosis of his organs in avant-garde performances. Timlin, an investigator from the National Organ Registry, obsessively tracks their movements, which is when a mysterious group is revealed… Their mission – is to use Saul’s notoriety to shed light on the next phase of human evolution.

The film feels like director David Cronenberg chooses to begin the movie with a shock in the middle of beauty. As it shows how quickly things can go from simple to shocking. Which is to prepare the audience for what comes after and throughout. Even though the rest of the film is similar in quality though some might turn away because of the more graphic scenes. The film never feels like a horror film.

Not really a horror film. As it does involve what could be considered body horror even though in theory it does explore a society where bodies can create phantom limbs. Extends more into science fiction and in exploring that phenomenon where it is special but a little more commonplace. Thought leans itself towards science fiction or more hardcore fantasy as it does build not only a world only bit in visuals but more in small details that makes it more intimate and more disturbing how close it can be to more of a civilized reality in design. Which is a marvel In itself.

So that while the film might be disturbing to some. It never quite reaches the heights of disgust, but as with most David Cronenberg films, there is a sensational aspect that tries ti be subtle. That for some might be lightly provocative  but feels more there ti be provocative but that factor is more the director every day and for his audience, it might actually feel aggressive 

It tries to go to some extremes and while it might shock some audience members for Cronenberg’s fans or those used to his movies. It comes with the territory. If not expected when it comes to his films. If anything it is more shocking when his films are lighter or shows restraint. This isn’t a man you expect to take the road or provide any out-and-out comedy from.

The film for all of its raciness still strangely feels a bit tame, Never as exciting as it lets on or seems to be headed. Even one of the biggest stars in the movie comes off as more goofy than credible or irritating. 

Lea Seydoux is committed to her role and truly gives her all. One of her most expressive English language roles. She also adds a kind of European oddity to this artistic expenditure. She also adds a memorable nude scene. 

Cronenberg’s expression of ideas and imagination always seems to provoke. Who might believe he is out to shock though here it seems done to build a world.

One can’t say that they understood everything. Though you go with it as it keeps you invested, especially visually. As the effects are simple yet effective. It could be his presence his story and the effects matter of fact or rather than aiming to disgust 

The film does succeed in building a world where all of this is a result of one another.

The film feels experimental in lotus ten Stewart’s performance. As the rest of the film feels assured.

Not as shocking, not sure if that is due to what he has done before and we are used to it, or in this climate, it’s more here to shock us or move us. 

As this film feels more like a presentation than anything else. The film never quite feels full or it feels like a beginning to something but not a thorough ending. 

Grade: B-

JARHEAD (2005)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Sam Mendes
Written By: William D. Broyles Jr. 
Based on the book By: Anthony Swafford 
Cinematography: Roger Deakins 
Editor: Walter Murch 

Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Jamie Foxx, Peter Sarsgaard, Lucas Black, Ming Lo, Brian Geraghty, Scott Macdonald 

A psychological study of Marine’s state of mind during the Gulf War. Told through the eyes of a U.S. Marine sniper who struggles to cope with boredom, a sense of isolation, and other issues back home.

This film is a visually stunning coming-of-age story set in the armed forces. That might be a great Anti-war film in itself. As it shows men who believe in their country and want to go to war to defend it, but not that much happens as there is no war really going on. So we see the rigors of the day-to-day life of the platoon and how they slowly become disillusioned.

Though there are still plenty of stories to tell as we get more into their backgrounds and day-to-day lives. Much of it seems like much ado about nothing.

That provides a portrait of the rage and frustration of a group of soldiers. Who joined up looking to spill blood and kill but rarely ended up seeing any action. So they end up trying to find outlets for their aggression. 

Jamie Foxx plays their angry commander. Who is also looking for glory days, but keeps coming up short. 

While feeling the soldiers’ frustration is the film’s aim. You also feel frustrated with the film at times, for while it is vivid, barely anything happens.

So it ends up becoming a character study that truly only explores two characters deeply. Those played by Jake Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarasgaard. As the rest are more comedic.

So that the film offers a grand scale presentation and dark comedy throughout. Though more built around its star.

Despite all this, the film manages to make a small impact, more than some other films about the military or even war. The movie CHERRY with Tom Holland comes to mind. Even if at times it feels like it is presented as pop art of military life. Like a modern-day CATCH-22 only not as deep. 

As the film is based on a book, really a memoir by the author of his time in the armed forces. So that it becomes a character study of the situation of the young man. The deprivation he experiences through it all. It seems more about the frustration of joining, thinking you will be a hero and make a difference, and then coming back home feeling like a failure and that you really had no impact. Though still a one-of-a-kind experience of male bonding. 

Grade: C+

EMPIRE OF LIGHT (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Sam Mendes 
Cinematography: Roger Deakins 
Editor: Lee Smith 

Cast: Olivia Colman, Michael Ward, Colin Firth, Toby Jones, Tom Brooke, Tanya Moore, Hannah Onslow, Crystal Clarke, Monica Dolan, Rob Cook 

Hilary is a cinema manager struggling with her mental health, and Stephen is a new employee longing to escape the provincial town where he faces daily adversity. Together they find a sense of belonging and experience the healing power of music, cinema, and community.

This is pretty much what a prestige film is these days. An acclaimed director with a noteworthy cast. Offers a slice of life here a semi-autobiographical tale. That includes social issues, romance, and mental illness. As well as it is a character piece and a period piece.

This is also a love letter first and foremost it is the magic of Movies and their presentation houses. Theaters are treated like not only churches here but castles with many hidden passages and discoveries to be made.

The main story involves characters who are misfits in some way or another and considered different who find each other and inspire one another to be brave and believe in themselves and engage more in life.

While the romance feels a little far-fetched the performers make it believable. As the racial prejudice the film. Deals with is an issue that is dealt with wholeheartedly in one scene showing the ugliness and senseless violence it inspires and lives in. Though the scene should feel mroe powerful and better put together. It is a showpiece but Never quite has that energy. 

In fact, an earlier scene with a disgruntled grumpy customer has more tension and says more than the mini-riot scene. 

As usual, the film is beautifully filmed. As that might be sort of the problem. It is beautifully presented and is gorgeous on its own, but it’s never quite as deep as it should be. That it feels more like a showpiece. That has a bunch of intentions but never quite feels natural. It always feels like a production and you can see It’s Directions and manipulations. That comes off a bit corny and too idealistic.

Olivia Colman gives a good performance but again it feels like a performance that she has been there and done. Though she is the most memorable in the film. As she is pretty much one of the leads.

Michael’s award offers youth, innocence, and some charisma. I only wish the film would allow him to be a little more lively and less passive all the time. It is understandable in that climate why he might want to be, but he is also young and only wants nice does he show that righteous anger. 

Colin Firth has a smaller supporting role and it seems as he gets older and once he won the Oscar. A lot of his roles are like this kind of an in-and-out. He is a major character in the story but only comes around when it needs him or he is available. He never seems to be in the leading roles he used to. He is a vital part of things but seems to be cameoing

This is a film foremost for people who love movies. The presentation and magic behind the scenes as well as in front.

As this film presents movie theaters and movies in a way that I have been talking about for years in writing and in conversations, but this film diverges in a different path. While still subtly spouting the gospel. 

It can feel like a religion. As you base a lot of faith into these escapes and wish fulfillment 

It also feels like after covid a kind of statement to show how beautiful and one-of-a-kind movie theaters are and that we should take full advantage of them to keep them here and alive. As streaming takes over and business practices theaters are trying to implement more to stay afloat financially are shooting themselves in the foot and really doing a disservice to the fans that still attend movies at theaters. It feels like a shakedown for staying faithful. 

It’s a film you will enjoy though you might not take to heart as much as the film intended. 

Grade: B-

I LOVE MY DAD (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: James Morosini  Cinematography: Steven Capitano Calitri Editor: Josh Crockett

Cast: Patton Oswalt, James Morosini, Claudia Sulewski, Amy Landecker, Lil Rel Howery, Rachel Dratch, Ricky Velez, Sarah Helbringer 

A hopelessly estranged father catfishes his son in an attempt to reconnect.

This film is supposedly based on a true story and if that is a fact. This Is either a brave admission that I am sure has been somewhat exaggerated to a degree or a rather genius demented dark comedy. 

The film sounds interesting to most until they actually see how it is affecting both characters. Sure it’s helping the son and the father-son relationship, but It’s built on lies and bad communication that isn’t malicious. It’s more desperate and misdirected though for a reason.

So that towards the end you care for everyone involved even the ones affected inadvertently. We are allowed to see glimpses of play out. As you know that they’re nice the truth comes out and it must. It will feel more like a horror film.

An aspect that one admired about the film above all else, is the way that it integrates the text conversations into seemingly more face-to-face conversations. So that the audience isn’t left exclusively trying to read the screen during half of the film. Allowing the scenes and scenarios an extra dimension and a new level of compatibility for the characters. As well as comfort.

As it also gives us a glimpse into inner thoughts. While reminding us how disturbing the situation is. Like when sexting owns another. 

Though it might be that new filmmakers who grew up with texting being practically second nature have figured out how to creatively make it work and have it especially work for them

As with most dark comedies it does end with hope. Even though most of the film, there is discomfort.

It’s nice to see Patton Oswalt in more of a leading man role again. That actually seems to fit him. As with him, you believe everyone in their roles. 

You have to believe James Morosini, as he is the writer/director that this all happened to supposedly in real life. So essentially playing himself.

Makes you wonder what he will have next up his sleeve or is this a one and done and just wanted to get his personal story out there. 

Some little tidbits you are left to wonder like was the son socially awkward before going to the Mrs tap hospital or just after his breakdown and is it directly due to not having a male figure around? 

The film even with its freaky subject matter is never mean-spirited and offers more of a gentle touch. As this might remind some of the movie WORLD’S GREATEST DAD though that film has Its Strengths. Most of the characters in that film were unlikeable and had an agenda at some point. So that it came off as cynical. It would make a good double feature with it though. 

Here this film has its own identity and tries to be rough but offers some hope. Where the main character of the father admits to his mistakes and is not delusional, but suffers a connected series of events. Where he continuously digs himself deeper.

So that it becomes truly a comedy of errors.

Grade: B-

FATHER STU (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed by Rosalind Ross
Cinematography: Jacques Jouffret 
Editor: Jeffrey M. Werner 

Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Mel Gibson, Jacki Weaver, Malcolm McDowell, Teresa Ruiz, Jack Kehler, Aaron Morten, Cody Fern, Carlos Leal

Follows the life of Father Stuart Long, a boxer-turned-priest who inspired countless people during his journey from self-destruction to redemption. Based on a true story. 

The film obviously speaks to the beliefs and sensibilities of the two stars of the film Mark Wahlberg and Mel Gibson. It’s a truly inspirational story that ends up redeeming itself in the end. 

The film takes a while to get started and Mark Wahlberg looks a bit old for the leading role, but he does what the role Calls for, staying self-deprecating.  yet charismatic and quite funny. Not to mention gets to play an extraordinary human character. 

Mel Gibson plays his father in a mode he is becoming quite familiar with. That is usually ex-alcoholic and/or white trash. Here he has a chance at a more dramatic role. Where at times he is thrown into stereotype and at others you truly can feel him as the character.

The romance angle is perfectly handled as it takes its time and by the time he has finally gotten what he wanted. Yet still hasn’t made a complete change a tragedy happens that makes him devote his life to god. 

What truly sets the film and story apart is that after that tragedy another tragedy is revealed and while it gives the film a curve from the by-numbers way it seems like it was going. It also adds dramatic depth that the film had already given us an abundance of, but then finally and truly felt.

Truthfully the film that seems lively at first truly doesn’t come alive and exciting until that second act when he is truly trying to strive for bigger and better things. Even throughout the film, his character seems to be searching and trying for something new to fulfill himself and change his life for the better.

Based on a true story you can only do so much, but this film is an uplifting story and a crowd-pleaser. It is hard to knock it, but it is definitely not a film I could imagine watching more than once.

Grade: C

TAR (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Todd Field
Cinematography: Florian Hoffmeister 
Editor: Monika Willi 

Cast: Cate Blanchett, Noemie Merlant, Nina Hoss, Sophie Kauer, Mark Strong, Sydney Lemmon, Sylvia Flote, Zachary D. Smith-Gneist 

Having achieved an enviable career few could even dream of, renowned conductor/composer Lydia Tár, the first female principal music director of the Berlin Philharmonic, is at the top of her game. As a conductor, Lydia not only orchestrates, she manipulates. As a trailblazer, the passionate virtuoso leads the way in the male-dominated classical music industry. Moreover, Lydia prepares for the release of her memoir while juggling work and family. She is also willing to take up one of her most significant challenges: a live recording of Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 5. However, forces that even the imperious maestro can’t control slowly chip away at Lydia’s elaborate facade, revealing the genius’s dirty secrets and the insidious, corrosive nature of power. What if life knocks Lydia off her pedestal?

This film feels like an epic in its Scope and locations but also really for this one character. Who goes all over the spectrum of emotions and from being high on the horse to l falling so low. 

As impressive as the film is, the performance of Cate Blanchett is mesmerizing; it certainly helps that she is constantly on the screen and she is in every scene. This also allows us to notice that we see everything from her point of view.

We see how high her ego is but also how talented she is and can easily back it up. We see her views on certain subjects and life. As well as her behavior in life. 

We also see her downfall and never are quite sure if she is guilty or not, but we can see that those around her totally abandon her and now that the mighty have fallen are willing to sell her out. How some might have even conspired In her downfall, getting passed over once gotten what they wanted, has no problem only added to her downfall.

We never really get an answer to her guilt but can see questionable behavior. Such as threatening a little girl who bullies her daughter we might be able to understand that as a parent, but who is to say she doesn’t have that attitude with those older yet under her. Who needs her approval 

As she is touchy with younger students but that seems more free-flowing. We never see her victims, only glimpses of emails that her assistant has been keeping and filing.

It becomes a mystery in itself as to who exactly is behind taking her down. Though the film remains subtle. It keeps offering hints of what might be happening behind the scenes. Who might be holding grudges and why. As her attitude is flippant toward those around her.

In its own way, it is a tragedy that is a black comedy. In The second half, the film is systematically her downfall and her reaction to it as it happens and she gets more and more unbalanced. Which is when the true range of Blanchett’s Performance truly shines.

Then in the third act where she tries to get her career back and the lengths she has to go through just to work. All the way to a foreign land where even though she obviously dislikes her surroundings there are hints that she might be guilty of what she has been accused of as far as grooming. Such as when she goes to the massage parlor and runs out and throws up. We suspect that this is after realizing what kind of parlor it is, but also it might be after that she has to resort to paying for this kind of attention.

That is how the film presents her as a double-edged sword of someone who we could admire but also might be repulsive and guilty of her accusations. As even when she sees her brother he is nonchalant about her and his feelings towards her and why in pure and simple language.

That is the magic of the film. Everything is presented plainly but there are so many subtle hints that you never know exactly the truth only how she sees it. Even though the video footage was presented later we know was doctored. As we sat through her class and know her comments have been cut together. 

The film’s comedy is very dry and subtle but on second viewing it becomes a little more clear. As the first time, the film jsit feels devastating and the biggest joke of all is the finale. As we see the audience for her 

Grade: B+