RESIDENT EVIL (2026)

Directed By: Zach Cregger

Written By: Zach Cregger and Shay Hatten

Cinematography: Darius Wolski

Editor: Joe Murphy 

Cast: Austin Abrams, Paul Walter Hauser, Kali Reis, Zach Cherry, Will Merrick, Sara Paxton, Zoe Bella, Andrea Miltnerova

A hapless courier is tasked with delivering a package to a remote hospital. He soon finds himself caught in the middle of an outbreak and must fight through hordes of mutated creatures to survive.


Let me start off by saying I never really played the video game of this so I don’t know the actual storyline or history. All I know is the previous films. Which were entertaining, but definitely products of their time. None of them were truly masterpieces or what one might qualify is good but they were passable.

This film is another beast as this film ties into the resident evil lore of the video game, but this could’ve totally been an original film and it would’ve worked just as well. It just now has a bit more of a built-in audience as it is connected to the game. Luckily any audience members can follow as it goes along 

Now let’s tackle the elephant in the room. Surprised at how much humor there is in the film throughout. There is a shocking a certain amount of laughs, but it is a horror film through and through with comedic elements thrown In. Rather then the other way around. It feels like the comedy is to acknowledge the ridiculous nature of what is happening at times. As well as way to have a release of tension every once in while. As there is still graphic violence and plenty of jump scares.

The protagonist isn’t the typical action hero nor the usual horror hero so him making bad decisions makes more sense and makes them feel more identifiable for the audience, as well as keeps the plot moving, and the action popping. The credit has to be given to Austin Abrams, as this is pretty much almost a one man show performance at least for most of the film it stays that was, very physical. Which will remind many of Bruce Campbell in THE EVIL DEAD films. As well as that type of mood. Definitely a star-making turn for him.

When other character characters appear in the film, it always feels a bit strange as we’re so used to only deal dealing with our main character. It’s nice to see Paul Walter Hauser in this film in a pivotal role that comes across more as comedic relief as well as Kali Reis as a kick ass security expert. 

The film is scary yet feels fun as we get deeper in the character faces more challenges as well as discovery, which does eventually feel like the film is leveling up as it goes along. 

One of the smarter aspects of the film is how they naturally create POV shots like from a video game that are thrown in time to time and made to look more makeshift as a survival method In dark places.

The fact that there’s very little dialogue keeps the film more tense.

Zach Cregger even though he doesn’t have to shows what he can do with ip that he didn’t originate and still make a film that is all his own. It’s sort of reminds one of what Frank Darabont was trying to do when he was still running the television show. THE WALKING DEAD. In wanting to obviously have the stories in the plot, but be able to take a moment for maybe a side story or give a chance for a side character to shine.

Though you have to say that for Zach Crager, this is 400 out of the successes for his films. Though he did co-direct and star in the comedy MISS MARCH. I will say that I enjoyed this more than I did his film WEAPONS. 

The unexpected third act that tells the tale of what would normally be a side character and allows for them to have depth plus allow allowing us to see what role they played in the overall story. 

Have to give it credit for where it goes. Especially when there are some Ty of places you don’t think it will venture to and it does and practically bathes in it. 

It’s easy to agree that this is the best out of all of the franchise obviously.

Grade: A

HOUSE OF GUCCI (2021)

Directed By: Ridley Scott
Written By: Becky Johnston & Roberto Bentivenga
Based on the Book By: Sara Gay Forden 
Cinematography: Dariusz Wolski
Editor: Claire Simpson 

Cast: Lady Gaga, Adam Driver, Jeremy Irons, Al Pacino, Jared Leto, Jack Huston, Salma Hayek, Camille Cottin, Reeve Carney 

When Patrizia Reggiani, an outsider from humble beginnings, marries into the Gucci family, her unbridled ambition begins to unravel their legacy and triggers a reckless spiral of betrayal, decadence, revenge, and ultimately…murder.


This should be a movie that could almost guarantee an audience. It has a strong true life story of an emotive that is successful and slowly crumbles. The infighting amongst the family for control of this empire. An outsider who comes in and manipulates everyone and then later a true crime aspect. 

For such an established and pedigree cast this film should be much better. It is grand in style though strangely considering the story should feel epic. Never achieves the heights and power that it should. It never feels rich or full-bodied. 

Now, this is Lady Gaga’s first big starring role after A STAR IS BORN. All eyes are on her as she has the showiest role and while she does ok. It might have been much stronger with a more experienced actress. Who could captivate the audience.

Jared Leto acts like he is in a totally different film. His performance comes off as more comedic but will admit he is the most entertaining part of the film. As with him In Scenes. The film either feels uneven or that it is slipping more into camp at times. 

The film at least allows for other cast members to shine but they rarely come close to being as interesting or captivating. Other than gaga Adam driver has the character who shows the most range in terms of emotions and situations. 

The script fails at times also. As gaga’s character at first seems In love and humble and then all of a sudden seems to desire money and success manipulating her husband and the rest of the family. It might have been a little more understandable if the film showed she was a girl who came from much more humble beginnings and once around. Wealth and success she got spoiled and wanted to stay in that environment. Instead of making. It seems like she was a power mad gold digger all of a sudden.

The film feels like it is going through the motions of telling the story rather than being invested in it or the characters. It feels to a matter of fact or more reporting. Even in the good times, you don’t feel heights of joy or happiness. Though Can only go so far as Based ona true story

The film feels like it lacks the glamour and indulgence. It’s pretty much a television movie with a star name cast and more of a budget and even has scenes to help individualize the characters

It might be that wanting to show her more rags to riches we see glimpses  of the power and fortune and are left with more the gaudy and rather basic indulgences and keep i everything smaller with lesser volumes as far as size of story making it feel more personal 

As far as star casting she is in the middle of it all and does fine but needs a bigger star for us to indulge in. Went to tell a mroe realistic story instead of letting it either go to camp or makign it more about the Star than the story ala evita and with lady Gaga can see it as that kind of film where it could be but here the peers that be were more interested in story and details 

Which might disappoint her audience but for fans wanting to learn the story or look for this to be a mroe all around film night prefer it

When dealing with a film about a known empire of fashion. Most expect a film More of style than substance. Maybe the thinking of the filmmakers was to be more restrained as style would be expected. As the story itself was so wild in the first place.

In the end it ends up not only a true crime drama that only showcases that aspect in the last third. As the first third is a romance and rags to riches story and the middle is indulgence but after all is said and done it is ultimately a tragedy. Where the new element brought the house down, but also everyone’s individual greed is their own worst enemies that becomes personified in the end 

The film Works on many different levels for the audience star power as she has a best actress nomination. She has to be jsit as good as her cast memebers making her bring more of an a game as most of these actors are good even on their worst days

Her power of celebrity brings most of they punter audience even if not for die hard fans there is that element for others to see if she is up to par with her co-stars 

It would only be more heightened if she had performed a song for the soundtrack which might have helped the film financially but then would have come over even more as a vanity project 

Having Al Pacino in a movie set in Italy and with a crime drama background already poses sea the stereotype of somehow involving the mob. Luckily when it comes to him and his pedigree he is associated only with illustrious films about the mob that are mroe legendary

The film looks good but never quite as sharp as it should and never achieves the dramatic depth it should. Making it feel like it is constantly missing an ingredient. As it is definitely missing a sense of glamour.

Grade: C+

SICARIO: DAY OF THE SOLADADO (2018)

sicario-2-movie-review-2018-read-25297d5b-fc67-42dd-b25f-93937ed1cf35

Directed By: Stefano Sollima
Written By: Taylor Sheridan
Cinematography: Dariusz Wolski
Editor: Matthew Newman 

Cast: Benicio Del Toro, James Brolin, Catherine Keener, Jeffrey Donovan, Isabella Moner, Matthew Modine, Shea Whigham, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Elijah Rodriguez 


The drug war on the U.S.-Mexico border has escalated as the cartels have begun trafficking terrorists across the US border. To fight the war, federal agent Matt Graver re-teams with the mercurial Alejandro.

Continue reading “SICARIO: DAY OF THE SOLADADO (2018)” →