Tag: Amanda Seyfried

THE TESTAMENT OF ANN LEE (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Mona Fastvold

Written By: Mona Fastvold And Brady Corbet 

Cinematography: William Rexer 

Editor: Sofia Subercaseaux 

Cast: Amanda Seyfried, Lewis Pullman, Thomasin Mckenzie, Christopher Abbott, Matthew Beard, Stacy Martin, Tim Blake Nelson, Daniel Blumberg, David Cale, Viola Prettejohn

Ann Lee, the founding leader of the Shaker Movement, is proclaimed as the female Christ by her followers. This film depicts her establishment of a utopian society and the Shakers’ worship through song and dance, based on real events.

This is a hard film to quite get your head around. 

Though it definitely makes an impression. As it is an epic done on a budget, but still manages to be quite illustrious throughout even when it seems like it’s not doing that much or playing it basic at times.

Which showcases limitation, but works for the time the story is set in when the world and society was still building itself.

The film is a musical and the religious choreography, testimonial music score and movements are great. Which is what keeps a captivating and keeps your interest as it might not have been as magical if it had played as a straight drama. It might’ve felt more like a prestige film rather than something of its own concoction while trying to tell a true story.

The film gets matters of the flesh out of the way early, so that while that theme is always in the background, it’s not as heavily a focus, and once the lead character played by Amanda Seyfried goes all in with her religion and beliefs. We don’t get to see any really again, it’s more hinted at or implied, but never seen until when the film needs to be brutal.

One can see this from getting more of an audience as more people discovered it through word-of-mouth as it might not be perfect, but it certainly is interesting and never boring

Amanda Seyfried in the lead is strong and memorable. One of her strongest performance is so far as it seems like with each new passing year and each new project she does get stronger as an actress and more captivating to see with her range.

Christopher abbot plays another terrible character. Which at this point he seems to have cornered the market on. When not playing leading roles. 

The film ends brutally as that seems to be the case when it comes to most films, depicting religion or even religious ones as usually we know how they will end. It’s all in how he get there.

What keeps this from exciting is that you Never quite know where it’s going so it manages to be quite an Odyssey in of itself. Even with its limited surroundings. 

Looking forward to more films from this filmmaker.

Grade: B+ 

I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOU (2025)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: David Joseph Craig & Brian Crano

Cinematography: Lowell A. Meyer 

Editor: Nancy Richardson 

Cast: Nick Kroll, Andrew Rannells, Amanda Seyfried, Morgan Spector, Eleonora Romandia, Nunzia Schiano, Vincenzo Gallo, Arcangelo Iannace 

An American couple, on the verge of adopting a baby, goes on an Italian vacation – an opportunity to reconnect before the new addition arrives. Everything is picture-perfect; the epitome of a European baby moon, when things begin to spiral out of control. On the way to a fabulous dinner, they get their rental car stuck in a ditch and are stranded in rural nowhere in a downpour. These two Americans, who are used to being catered to, are now in a foreign land without service, an Italian language comprehension of about zero, and clear relationship turmoil that could explode at any minute. Fear obviously takes over.

This is a film that at first seems like it will be your typical couple comedy. Which it stays throughout until it takes a dark turn and seems to stay on that road until the end.

Where usually I enjoy films like these. There is something a bit off. As it stays true to it’s title. As most of the trouble comes from miscommunication. That seems to escalate Into violence seemingly accidently.

It’ not the characters exactly as they seem to be normal and just reacting to their situations that seem to get out of hand. it’s the films attitude that tries to humanize the victims, but also makes them caricatures and easily either forgettable or challenges. There isn’t much to truly dwell on or feel sorry for.

While the characters aren’t hateful or malicious. They might be a bit extreme in some situations, but by the ending they cone off too easy. That leaves a bad taste in the audiences mouth. That just feels like a reminder of rich caucasian males getting away literally with murders. Not that they should be especially punished but it feels like there should be something they lose or some way in which they have to pay or lose something. As there is some evidence that they left behind that could come back to haunt them.

Though the film seems to want us to root for them Abd let them drive off and be happy. As the film gives them something that humanized them and makes us identify with them in the form of having them await the birth of a baby they are adopting. After bei g brined before they are hoping this time. They will finally get a chance to be parents. That is the only sympathetic part of the story. We truly have for them.

The movie constantoy up’a the stakes but nothing lingers. So that it feels like it’s making a cake and it comes out as a tart. As the film reminds the audience of so many sitcoms only with better production values. As at least Nick Kroll and Andrew Rennells work well off of one another that makes their pairing feel effortless and like they are inorigng in the situation that makes them and their relationship come across as natural and real. If only the rest if the film came off that way. 

In the end, It just never feels like it has any real stakes. It breezes through like a wind storm (not a hurricane as the material isn’t that strong or wacky) and throws plenty against the wall to see what sticks.

Grade: C

CHLOE (2009)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Atom Egoyan 
Written By: Erica Cressida Wilson 
Based on The Original Screenplay NATHALIE By: Anne Fontaine 
Cinematography By: Paul Sarossy 
Editor: Susan Shipton 
 
Cast: Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, Amanda Seyfried, Max Thierot, Nina Dobrev

Catherine and David, she a doctor, he a professor, are at first glance the perfect couple. Happily married with a talented teenage son, they appear to have an idyllic life. But when David misses a flight and his surprise birthday party, Catherine’s long simmering suspicions rise to the surface. Suspecting infidelity, she decides to hire an escort to seduce her husband and test his loyalty. Catherine finds herself ‘directing’ Chloe’s encounters with David, and Chloe’s end of the bargain is to report back, the descriptions becoming increasingly graphic as the meetings multiply.

An emotional thriller, That comes off more like melodrama. The film is supposed to be erotic at times but always felt cold to the touch. All the time there never seems to be any passion or warmth between family and marriages, Not even in the love scenes. This is a constant problem. Not only in this film but a consistent one when it comes to the films of Atom Egoyan that I have seen.

He definitely has talent as a director. Though this is not the right project for him. He still in my opinion hasn’t found the right project to explore it. Not since EXOTICA at least. Even when it comes to his other films THE SWEET HEREAFTER. It’s more the story and material that I am impressed with than the direction. Julianne Moore gives a good tightly wound performance, It really is her movie.

The film after a certain point gets more and more ridiculous and becomes less an arty drama than another genre exercise altogether. Though the film does have a certain style. As well as a overwrought colorful palette of white in the backgrounds. Surprisingly this film was produced by Ivan Reitman. 

I know this is a remake of a French film. For some odd reason, this film gets lost in translation as the film has the right looks and visuals, but feels wrong or that is all flying on all the wrong cylinders. The home life of the central family of characters feels too liberal and too distant. The film falls apart since it is ill-fitting. While the story feels plausible and believable. The scene where it’s all explained just sounds ridiculous. Strangely it feels more like a chick flick. Then anything else with a little eroticism thrown in. 

The eroticism hangs like a cloud through the whole film though there is sensuality in parts yet lacks sex and skin on display. I think your enjoyment of the film will be measured by your attraction to Amanda Seyfried. 

Amanda Seyfried is sexy and a good enough actress, but it feels more like she is playing dress-up. She plays what she thinks is sexy or at least what she thinks sexy is. Without really knowing what is actually sexy, Erotic, or sensual.  The ending feels too theatrical. 

 Screenwriter Erica Cressida Wilson seems to usually write the screenplays for these types of films. Sexually Explicit but emotionally restricted characters bubbling under the surface with passion. She writes usually complex female character dramas with Projects like FUR and SECRETARY.  

Wait for Cable.   

GRADE: C-