LE BONHEUR (*HAPPINESS) (1965)

Written & Directed By: Agnes Varda 

Cinematography: Claude Beausoleil And Jean Rabier 

Editor: Janine Verneau

Cast: Jean-Claude Drouot, Claire Drouot, Marie-France Boyer, Marcelle Favre-Bertin, Manson Lanclos 

François, a young carpenter, lives a happy, uncomplicated life with his wife Thérèse, and their two small children. One day he meets Emilie, a clerk in the local post office.


There is no way I can talk about this film without spoiling it, so if you haven’t seen it, check it out first and then come back for the review.

This is one of those films where I could give you a simple review, but this film wasn’t made for that if you want the simple review, it’s good watching, though I’m not sure a lot of people will appreciate it or like it, but in a long-term sense.

This is one of those films that’s meant to be experienced, but also discussed as different people will see different things in it, and have different opinions about and touch subjects that most of us have experienced or have witnessed, and have definite opinions from our point of view that might not match the film’s

First off, this is my first Agnes Varda film, the celebrated late Director, so I wasn’t exactly sure what I would get. 

Most of this film is a happy-go-lucky movie, but as you get towards the end, that is when the films seem to present itself.

This is a tricky Film where everything no matter what happens seems happy though there’s a subversive current going through it as we see this man who is perfectly happy just starting fair and fall in love so easily with another woman, even though he’s in a supposedly happy marriage and we never see any signs of stress or boredom within it he is willing to give everything to his mistress who doesn’t seem upset that he’s actually married.

After we watch how he functions with his wife and his marriage, and then this affair starts and then around the end of the second act, he finally tells his questionable wife, consequences that we are never 100% sure of as it is sad that she has drowned, seems rather questionable as to maybe she decided to end her life, especially after he has informed her of his affair and then expects her to be OK with it and makes love with her and Field, like his actions were a mere Infraction that he will Keep Doing but the story goes along.

Even though he told his wife that he loved the woman and her both, he is willing to end the affair and just be with her, but if she truly loved him, she would let him continue as he can still love both of them equally as long as they love him.

This would seem like a film made by a misogynistic man who wants to come across as romantic and sympathetic, but actually made by a female Director, trying to present this with a bow, but also expose the hypocrisy involved becomes all the more disturbing and basically replaces his late white with his mistress and everything seems to go back the same, and he never pays any consequences. 

Never seems to show any sorrow and gets exactly what he wants, and there’s no confrontation. There’s no real drama, which gives the film a kind of sarcasm, as the film seems to just let this man get away with everything and never pay any consequences.

which was a reality at the time, and unfortunately might still be in most cases, but also the fact that it seems to be having a commentary on how romantic films of this type played under the male gaze, where the woman always suffers, in the man gets exactly what he wants here. It feels like you should feel outraged over this, but unfortunately, there are no real problems for the character and it feels like an injustice.

Grade: A – 

ONE SINGS, THE OTHER DOESN’T (1977)

Written & Directed By: Agnes Varda 

Cinematography: Charlie Van Damme 

Editor: Joele Van Effenterre

Cast: Therese Liotard, Valerie Mairesse, Robert Dadies, Ali Rafie, Gisele Halimi, Nicole Clement

The intertwined lives of two women in 1970s France, set against the progress of the women’s movement in which Agnes Varda was involved. Pomme and Suzanne meet when Pomme helps Suzanne obtain an abortion after a third pregnancy which she cannot afford. They lose contact but meet again ten years later. Pomme has become an unconventional singer, Suzanne a serious community worker – despite the contrast they remain friends and share in the various dramas of each others’ lives, in the process affirming their different female identities.


This is the third film by Agnes Varda that I have seen and wasn’t a plan. Though thankful that I have seen her work. as none of her films were ever at the top of my list to watch, but I am glad to have seen each of them by the end. I am impressed by how they make the audience feel.

This one is pretty epic as it feels like a film on which the Bette Midler-Barbara Hershey movie Beaches might’ve been based as this film observes the friendship between two women over 10 years. From their introduction to one another in their 20s, they reach a certain point of maturity.

The difference is that this film is not only about femininity but also and large part about women’s rights, especially when it comes to their bodies and abortion as that act which was illegal Only a few years before this film was made in Paris, which is the way the friendship starts.

We see both characters through their, many romances and trials and tribulations. as well as they’re changing attitudes and interests. 

While they have mini adventures, the film does feel epic, even if it seems to stray only in a few places. 

Watching the film, it has come along at the right time as its issues are now coming under threat here in the United States, which makes it feel more relevant than ever. Especially Agnes Varda had to admit that she had one as a sign of protest and rebellion was very brave of her. Showing support and solidarity.

This film shows the future that existed because of this act, not because it was an inconvenience. There’s a film that shows the many hardships that the friends go through, but also their endurance, their happiness, and a kind of joy that is rare, and threw it all their friendship, survives and strives, even though they’re not together all the time they encourage each other and inform one another.

Though more common at the time it just reminds the viewer of how few modern films, explore the depth, nature, and strength of friendships.

Not to mention as the title goes, it does have quite a few music sequences, not musical sequences as some are show sing, intentional stage productions, and other scenes just involve the character singing at a protest or showing off the writing of a new song.

It’s a bit long, but after a while, you barely notice as it goes by so fast that it feels more like a book as it hasn’t enriched quality,  time, life, and hope.

The film manages to be political and heavy-handed on one end, but an effective character piece. Where you are enchanted by the characters and their actions as well as their fates

Grade: B+