COUP DE TORCHON (Aka CLEAN SLATE) (1981)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Bertrand Tavernier 

Written By: Bertrand Tavernier and Jean Aurenche

Based On The Novel “Pop. 1280” By: Jim Thompson 

Cinematography: Pierre-William Glenn

Editor: Armand Psenny 

Cast: Philippe Noiret, Isabelle Huppert, Jean-Pierre Marielle, Stephane Andean, Eddy Mitchell, Guy Marchand, Irene Skobline, Michael Beaune, Jean Champion, Victor Garrivier 

1938, in a French-African colony. Lucien Cordier is the cop of this village, populated with blacks and a few whites (usually racialist and lustful). He is a washout, everyone (including his wife Huguette) humiliates him. He never arrests anyone and looks at elsewhere when a dirty trick occurs. But one day, he turns into a Machiavellian exterminating angel.

This film can be looked at as a bit experimental, as it is based on a pulp thriller set in the United States but this version of the story is played out internationally in Africa, amongst the French colonists who are in the country.

While in the African’s land and home, these French characters who are more invaders in their territory, still think of themselves as superior and treat the natives like savages even though more or less, the so-called civilized characters, truly act more savage and heinous than any of them.

There are very few likable characters throughout this film it’s just that it takes time to learn the despicable of each, and somehow they seem to outshine each other as the tail goes along.

The Protagonist is a police chief in the area, though he is very Azih, and not very effective. He is in a loveless marriage, and having a secret affair that it seems most snow about but certain people acknowledge, but others are shocked. 

The young married woman that he is having an affair with is played by a very young Isabelle Huppert. Their early scenes are certainly sexual, but not erotic, and certainly feel dirty.

Until the police officer truly shows his sociopathic and psychopathic sides. And he ends up murdering two local pimps and covering up their murders implicating a colleague for it, and it seems like after that he seems to start a domino effect of anyone in his life who bothers him or stands in his way him getting rid of for whatever reason, and with each murder, he seems to lose another piece of his soul which already seemed kind of worthless. 

On one end, you could see this as a kind of revenge tail of a meat character finally standing up for himself and getting revenge on those who either don’t think much of him or sell him short,  but you also must wonder at times was he planning this the whole time And was waiting for the time to strike or was he just finally pushed too far and decided to act when the opportunity presented itself.

By the end, he has his own kind of superiority over other characters as he began, he seems to have a plan, and along the way, his plans seem to be changing as does his mindset.

whereas the reason he was doing it, and he was doing it, for he seems to see their true side And see them for what they are and wants to test them to see if they are worthy, and commonly they fail. He is the most testable it becomes a crabs in a bucket situation.

At first, it seems that lust is what drives his character and money seems to others as the film goes along. He seems to lose faith in anything, and everything that he believes in.

His married lover, who his wife seems to know about yet sometimes seems shocked, and his wife’s so-called brother, a truly her lover, are all over each other, and his house tries to even threaten to blackmail him with this affair.

The only character throughout this film, who seems innocent or just doesn’t know any better is the schoolteacher who the detective is on and sometimes has conversations with.

Don’t get me wrong. This film is hard to sit through. Almost every character is racist and uses that kind of language as well as assaults plenty of black characters that just seem to go with the territory and how evil the characters are in the first place.

Moving the setting of the tale from a small town in Texas to a small town in Africa. It seems to match the territory and gives the tale a wider point of view of which to not only look at it but study it also. As it is similarly, dusty, dirty, remote, yet tranquil.

The film can feel detestable at once, but not keep your interest. Never quite knowing what is going to happen next. It almost feels like a mystery only It’s not a who done it and we are watching from the killer’s point of view.

All the characters are racist. Which fits the noir tale. Most of the characters are unlikeable and a nest of vipers waiting to strike first. It’s Very inventive taking the Jim Thompson tale and making it a more international tale. The film is fascinating.

Based on the novel POP. 1280 by Jim Thompson. which I haven’t read, but this feels a bit similar as far as main characters go to the main character from another Jim Harrison tale THE KILLER INSIDE ME. As both are sheriff’s and psychopathic sociopaths 

Grade: B

BACK TO BLACK (2024)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Sam Taylor-Johnson

Written By: Michael Greenhalgh

Cinematography: Polly Morgan

Editor: Laurence Johnson and Martin Walsh 

Cast: Marisa Abela, Eddie Marsan, Jack O’Connell, Lesley Manville, Juliet Cowan, Sam Buchanan, Anna Daras, Spike Fearn, Therica Wilson-Read 

A celebration of the most iconic – and much missed – homegrown star of the 21st century, BACK TO BLACK tells the extraordinary tale of Amy Winehouse. Painting a vivid, vibrant picture of the Camden streets she called home and capturing the struggles of global fame, BACK TO BLACK honors Amy’s artistry, wit, and honesty, as well as trying to understand her demons. An unflinching look at the modern celebrity machine and a powerful tribute to a once-in-a-generation talent.

I was probably always going to be harsh on this film as I am such a huge Amy Winehouse fan and I feel like the documentary. AMY is a definitive and informative statement when it comes to her life.

When it comes to biofilms the best, don’t try to tell the whole story they pick a certain period of the person’s life and fill the drama, even if the drama comes from their past. As Amy lived such a short life there might’ve been room to fit in from birth to her unfortunate death at 27

Even after all these years, it still feels too soon for a biofilm as the scars are still there. So I will say the film isn’t as bad as I thought.

Marisa Abela is the best thing about this movie. She is amazing and mimics her vocal style impressively. There are no problems with her performance.

What hurts the film? Is that even at just a little over two hours? It still feels rushed half the time where you can’t tell what part of her career she’s at times. It would also help the love interest at least the film. Would Moore sweep her off her feet and you could understand why she is so attracted to him other than similar interest. as it plays here, he always constantly seems like a walking red flag, even if he might have some raw sexuality or a danger about him, but it never comes across as convincing that she would just give herself so to this character

Another problem in the film is that we see that she gets depressed over the death of her grandmother and the volatile relationship she has with Blake, but it still never quite explains the other parts of the downward spiral. Yes, we can say depression, but it helps if we’re given more evidence instead of kind of just being told in one scene, or constantly being lonely, we need a little more to flash out and to believe in this more.

Sam Taylor Johnson directed the John Lennon bio film NOWHERE BOY, so this isn’t new territory for her she lands the plane so to speak when it comes to this film, but it is quite a bumpy ride with plenty of turbulence that is more not the adventure of the story or characters, but more in the way the story is told it tries to have a smoothness where it feels like it’s not even trying Standard something a little bit more a TV production than a cinematic vision.

As in the end, it plays more like a sad romantic, love story. That is almost one-sided, though there was definitely passion and emotion somewhere in there. 

One believes that if you are a Die Hard true fan of Amy Winehouse, you do not need to see this film. You should’ve already seen Amy but if you’re just curious as to ask her just a bio seems to be a trend. This feels more like a student rather than, someone who cares about getting the story straight and the facts down

Grade: C

PRISCILLA (2023)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Sofia Coopola

Based on the Book “ELVIS AND ME” by: Priscilla Presley And Sandra Harmon

Cinematography: Philippe Le Sourd

Editor: Sarah Flack

Cast: Cailee Spaeny, Jacob Elordi, Ari Cohen, Dagmara Domincyzk, Tim Post, Lynne Griffin, Dan Beirne, Rodrigo Fernandez-Stoll, Dan Abramovici

When teenage Priscilla Beaulieu meets Elvis Presley, the man who is already a meteoric rock-and-roll superstar becomes someone entirely unexpected in private moments: a thrilling crush, an ally in loneliness, a vulnerable best friend.

An aesthetic to dig deeper into characters and moments lived in, not just the surface. A sensitive portrait or snapshot.

I get so excited about the new Sofia Coppola movies. While I enjoy her style, her movies I will admit at times aren’t the most exciting or action-packed. They are like stylistic recreations that are dramatized seem like recreations, and often feel humorous.

THE VIRGIN SUICIDES, LOST IN TRANSLATION, SOMEWHERE, and MARIE ANTOINETTE is her best and a kind of winning streak. The rest have had moments and pieces that are admirable it can be hit or miss even if beautifully filmed they are generally passable they can’t say that they are totally enjoy, they all make you think certainly are experiences in themselves.

In fact, some people will use that against her, saying that they are stylish live-action photo shoots to make her films easier to write off, though they do contain more than that you have to be willing to sit and experience them to finally discover it.

there is something about the everyday realities more than all the glitz and glamour that she tries to dissect looking to expose the truth maybe because she grew up on the other side within the fantasy of Fame so she knows it inside and out. She gets to see the power of fame and how it can easily corrupt, even those who are supposed to be Bastians of morality.

It Is a love story, but still showcasing a young lady a teenager who feels like she’s being groomed by a female, older established, and famous male, not only a star but an eventual icon.

There is expected to be an adult around them even though innocence is what seems to be the attraction for him.

The film is about her coming of age with life in this relationship, where she has to learn to gain her strength eventually and be independent from a more one-sided relationship.

The film is not a gossipy or sensationalistic account as that has never been Miss Coppola’s style. We already have many movies and documentaries about Elvis Presley Coppola seems to be trying to expose the more intimate portrait of a well-known love story, not focusing on the legend or his career as much as this is her story so that we can get a better understanding of where she’s at And had to go through.

As the domestication is more than anything, as we watch her, it shows like a little girl in a grown-up world, her being contained and cut off.

The film doesn’t have as many artistic flourishes and retro but is also kind of plain. It seems most of the movie takes place at Graceland.

Jacob Elordi is believable and gives an informed performance as Elvis Presley. he excels in the story of a relationship that offers snippets of his career So he gets to focus more on the dramatic side and charming side of Elvis not so much the showman or the performer. With him being cast in the old days, this might’ve been a starter film for him or a beefcake movie to test out a heartthrob and their box office strength but here it’s more artistic and not so much stunt, casting the film could easily be seen as movie material, made a bit more with depth and patience

Cailee Spaeny is as good as Priscilla in one of her first leading roles. She comes across, is fragile, believable, and strong in each iteration of Priscilla. Even if the performance doesn’t blow the audience away, it is more of an emotional one, as she is the one to take us through all of this, and who we care about.

I am more familiar with Priscilla Presley as an actress primarily from THE NAKED GUN movies so this film was actually kind of eye-opening for me. The film offers glimpses of what we know or what he is known for but shows what it was like to have to live with him through his crisis

We get to see romance from the beginning until the end, as it seems like at some point got tired, and the passion died. the passion died, we do see the introduction the first the seduction, the liking the falling in love the consideration of the marriage, The fights, and infidelity on his part.

This is a narrative a bit like the recent release, maestro seeing young love, but also as famous as maintained, and acquired how to affect a loved one behind the scenes, and how they learn to manage, staying more in the shadows, but still being a partner.

Also, it should be a given, and I love the soundtrack that doesn’t have that many Elvis Presley songs on it. It’s a return form for Sophia, Coppola, and Hits harder than one might expect at times and it still feels just a bit fluffy.

I remember when certain Directors had movies coming out part of the anticipation of a new release was the soundtracks not necessarily the scores, which one looked forward to unless it was done by a favorite like Jon Brion. Not even new music it was whatever classic or unknown songs or artists of the past they would use if it was a popular song, the Directors used it in such a way that you looked at an experience or listen to it differently than before if new to you you have obsessed over it like a brand new single hot off the presses.

Sofia Coppola still manages to do this, There’s a moment in the film where they listen to songs, and she says that the song lacks a catchiness to it, which is how some might feel, but this kept me thoroughly entertained and might be one of her more accessible films, though some will consider it a bit too slow for their taste.

It might represent the same old, which is successful, though, doesn’t end him to an audience as he comes across more as a time capsule, rather than changing with the times and him wanting to move on yet afraid. Just as his wife Priscilla has needs he seems to be deterred because it doesn’t fit in with what he knows especially during the 1960s a time of rapid change.

Ir Shows him learning and teaching himself having a rebellious attitude and learning independence. Even though the colonel shut him down, the same is happening with her. Only Elvis was doing it to her as they say hurt people hurt people, and then leaving her alone in a huge house to entertain herself, but not wanting her to mix too much with the staff, what was she to do?

Grade: B

FERRARI (2023)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Michael Mann

Written By: Troy Kennedy Martin

Based on the book “Enzo Ferrari: The Man, The Cars, The Races, The Machine” by: Brock Yates 

Cinematography: Erik Messerschmidt 

Editor: Pietro Scalia 

Cast: Adam Driver, Penelope Cruz, Patrick Dempsey, Shailene Woodley, Jack O’Connell, Gabriel Leone, Sarah Gadon, Michele Savoia, Valentina Belle, Tommaso Basili 

Set in the summer of 1957, with Enzo Ferrari’s auto empire in crisis, the ex-racer turned entrepreneur pushes himself and his drivers to the edge as they launch into the Mille Miglia, a treacherous 1,000-mile race across Italy.

Every holiday season, Adam Driver seems to cast a big project that might be questionable or controversial.

This film is a portrait of a certain time and the title character’s life that helps explain it and capsulate his past and present. That becomes exciting as its director, Michael Mann, and anyone who is a history aficionado of the title character.

Michael Mann seems to get older you notice that he has more interest in camaraderie and the definition of decision in a person’s life which is usually an older man looking back on life, he might identify more necessarily looking to or including the audience.

The film isn’t like the character reflecting on his life or on his last day or days before his death. It just focuses on a certain period in his life. The worst of times.

Penelope Cruz looks ravishing even here when they try to make her look plain. As she gives an exciting performance throughout the film, she has an international flavor with a jealous streak. As she gets older, she seems to become a more interesting actor, as she is no longer an ingenue, and the roles she gets are filled with more emotions and quite frankly seem to be a bit more juicy, even if not, necessarily the star or the damsel in distress.

I love Lady Gaga, but maybe her role in HOUSE OF GUCCI, if she was going to command the screen so much. She is one of the few notable things about this film. As she is so captivating, you can’t keep your eyes off of her. Takes with could’ve been a thankless role. It gives her something to do with plenty of dramatic territory and scenes. 

Shailene Woodley as the character’s unofficial mistress seems miscast, It could also be the writing as she’s never as interesting as the other characters and can’t seem to keep up with them either as even Sara Gadon playing one of Ferrari‘s drivers seems to have more of a dramatic and more to do or at least throughout.

Patrick Dempsey plays a supporting character. He is barely recognizable in the film. That was quite good.

The film is a Slow Burn. This film seems more for an audience of current enthusiasts or history fans who went to see the story you brought to life yet don’t like to read, maybe the film was meant for people to of the Ferrari car and Branding providing more insight and renewing interest. How he even views his drivers as disposable and wants to keep his brand pure, even though for success, he would have to dilute and make more cars essentially having to hand it over to another business to replicate more copies faster.

I wonder if the racing might’ve been more exciting watching in a theater. The film keeps feeling like it’s building towards something that never comes. Even if it seems like the race will be what this film will revolve around. It Never gets that exciting until a little twist, which is honestly the most shocking scene in the film and one of the best scenes of the film as it finally feels like something is happening.

The only time the film seems to come alive is in the scenes of Penelope Cruz and some of the car crashes.

This film feels like a brick, solid and heavy something to build upon or off of that never quite grows and needs more construction, though it is very well-made. It’s not that entertaining, It’s something to more admire than feel anything for.

The film is like a fine wine that has aged well. It looks luxurious. It looks delicious and refined and looks well made but when you finally go to taste it, it’s not what you expected, nor as good as it should be. Though I guess it comes down to Taste.

Grade: B- 

BARDO: FALSE CHRONICLES OF A HANDFUL OF TRUTHS (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Alejandro G. Inarritu 

Written By: Alejandro G. Inarritu and Nicolas Giacabone 

Cinematography: Darius Khondji

Editor: Alejandro G. Inarritu and Monica Salazar 

Cast: Daniel Gimenez Cacho, Griselda Siciliani, Ximena Lamadrid, Iker Soriano, Francisco Rubio, Jay O. Sanders, Luis Coutulier, Andres Almeida, Clementina Guadarrara 

An acclaimed documentarian goes on an introspective journey through surreal dreamscapes to reconcile with the past, the present, and his Mexican identity.

This film is an epic self-indulgent, semi-autobiographical tale that has beautiful cinematography.

It’s a memoir that feels like confessions or inner thoughts of the writer and Director. Alejandro G. Inarritu

It’s a film that no one can come close to explaining it’s definitely a film more to experience, even for all of itself indulgent tendencies at times

It seems like a film, where no matter how many times you watch it you get something new each time or notice something that you never saw before, and have to watch it again to understand it on a deeper level.

As it feels like you haven’t seen everything or quite get it do you want to. No, it doesn’t leave you exhilarated like the film EVERYONE EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE but you want to keep on exploring and examining the film just like that one as it seems to capture you and its own mindset

The film offers plenty of surreal imagery. Though never quite as strange as something that would come from Alejandro Jodorowsky 

The film does offer a lot to take in that you will either love or hate. Some might not want to put up with the film as it will feel hollow for some without enough story or plot, which leaves it easy to get lost in or during. As we spend time with the main character. 

The film feels like Alejandro G. Inarritu in his Fellini period. Where not only is the film autobiographical but seems to express his feelings about life and filmmaking. As a Director has made, Hollywood films and manages to put a personal stamp on them.

These days you have to try harder to have a career of only artistic indulgent personal films to raise your profile not to mention get a chance to tell Bigger stories that he wants to

This film feels like Fellini’s spirit is alive, only not as scandalous, but the director obviously has a lot to get off his chest and themes he wants to explore. This is the closest we might ever get to visionary autobiography.

Grade: B 

PROM DATES (2024)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Kim O. Nguyen

Written By: D.J. Mausner

Cinematography: Bradford Lipson

Editor: Daniel Reitzenstein 

Cast: Julia Lester, Antonia Gentry, Kenny Ridwan, Jordan Buhat, JT Neal, Zion Moreno, Terry Hu, John Michael Higgins, Chelsea Handler, Arianna Rivas, Emery Kelly 

“Prom Dates” follows best friends Jess and Hannah, who made a pact at 13 to have the perfect senior prom. Despite the impending changes that college will bring over the next four years, the two are committed to honoring their prom pact. But with only 24 hours left before the big event, everything falls apart when they break up with each of their dates. Jess and Hannah are left with one night to find new dates and live out their middle-school fantasies.

Automatically other films will come to mind while you watch this film most likely BOOKSMART. as it has a kind of similar structure of seemingly two days and one wild night in between with two best friends seemingly on a mission that they are united in, but slowly reveal their insecurities and problems they separate goes in their own direction.

Booksmart is probably a better well-made version of the story. This film is the more over-the-top gross wacky, comedic brand that is actually pretty fun and funny. This might be considered a low-rent version, but it is still enjoyable. 

It comes across as more sexual also while having an open-minded pro-LGBTQ plus characters throughout. With a wild night of partying, booze, drugs, and sex in between yet, the film never becomes too exploitive and still manages to be over the edge and funny.

The two leads are great Antonia Gentry is the more conventional pretty girl who for some odd reason always comes across as desperate, even though she should be in control and Julia Lester as her best friend, the kind of tomboy lesbian who gets all the best physical comedy scenes also more of the gross humor, but becomes the most identifiable character throughout.

Throughout the film, they run into challenges, but failures that do help define the night and them, and truly show the resilience of the characters.

Even though the ending is a little unexpected and offers a few little twists that one didn’t see coming, but still makes the film worthwhile and feels a little more realistic and its depiction. 

A subplot that involves one of the character’s brother and a secret hook-up or romance is needed to help flesh out his character, but also just seems tacked on and unnecessary. 

I can definitely give the film points for having a diverse cast. even having comedian Chelsea Handler in an unnecessary cameo role that helps add star power to the film, but at least gives parental representative throughout other than the principal played by John Michael Higgins.

The main characters’ parents are largely absent throughout the film, which also seemingly gives them room to really have no boundaries as there is no nagging looking for them or wondering where they are, which is one of the only parts of the film that might feel a little bit unrealistic parts of the film that it tries to present.

This is definitely a modern film, but it kind of feels like a throwback, it doesn’t offend, but it also seems like the film isn’t afraid to for a scene to work.

It’s definitely worth checking out as you will definitely have a laugh with this coming-of-age film, but it’s not necessarily things you haven’t seen before.

Grade: B- 

MOTHER OF THE BRIDE (2024)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Mark Waters 

Written By: Robin Bernheim

Cinematography: Ed Wu

Editor: Travis Sittard 

Cast: Brooke Shields, Benjamin Bratt, Miranda Cosgrove, Sean Teale, Chad Michael Murray, Rachael Harris, Michael McDonald, Wilson Cruz, Tasneek Roc, Dalip Sondhi 

Lana’s daughter Emma returns from London and announces that she’s getting married next month. Things become more complicated when Lana learns that the man who stole Emma’s heart is the son of the man who broke her years ago.

This is pretty much romance novel, a romantic comedy for an older audience as it shows. It’s never too late to find love. 

This tale starts out seeming like it’s for a younger audience. It slowly reveals itself to be more of a romance for the parents or the Older Crowd.

It’s nice to see many familiar faces amongst the cast who are clearly enjoying themselves. so that you can’t help but feel comfortable with the cast and characters. The film still feels a bit slight but then again I’m not the audience for this film. 

follow the formula of romantic comedies, seemingly to be aimed at older characters. I don’t know if it’s because feels like the air of Romantic comedy came and went and while there is an audience for it, it’s only the audience that was a fan of those movies in the 90s and 2000s, who are around the age of the characters in this movie?

Watching this film, you’re not going to see this for the filmmaking or the script you know what exactly is going to happen so you just sit there and wait for it or see how it’s going to happen on this beautiful foreign island with beautiful characters surrounded by nothing but opulence and money so that it is a fantasy come true.

The characters might seem ungrateful and annoying as mishaps happen throughout. As this is a film nothing offensive really happens and it feels like a more cinematic hallmark movie. As it has various cultures throughout and representation of most.

That is all positivity and hope and the problems that are brought up. Seems so minor that you wonder why the characters are making mountains out of molehills.

this is a pretty simple film and I believe you will enjoy it as long as you go with it and you will know if you’re a fan just by either watching the trailer or reading the synopsis because what you see is what you get with this movie.

Directed by Mark Waters, who also made the original MEAN GIRLS movie. He knows the territory. He knows the genre and he makes everything pretty and everyone looks amazing.

Grade: C- 

THE RE-EDUCATION OF MOLLY SINGER (2023)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Directed By: Andy Palmer

Written By: Todd M. Friedman and Kevin Haskin 

Cinematography: Filip Vandewal 

Editor: Tim Rush 

Cast: Britt Robertson, Nico Santos, Ty Simpkins, Cierra Ramirez, Jamie Pressly, Holland Roden, Zach Scheerer, Paul Soter, Emma Holzer, Carlos Alazraqui, Jonathan Lipnicki, Wendie Malick

To save her job, a young lawyer must go undercover, enrolling as a freshman at her old alma mater, in order to resuscitate the well-being of her Boss’ terribly awkward teenage son.

This film does have similarities to the recent Jennifer Lawrence starring movie NO HARD FEELINGS” wow that one was certainly raunchy yet had a certain innocence. This one tries to be dirty but still comes out kind of more teen-friendly.

Have no idea whether this film came first or no hard feelings came first if one copied the other, though both films are very different. This one feels a little more generic. it’s like the no-frills brand. It feels like a carbon copy with no flare. It feels like it should be trying but it’s not and it really needs help. 

While the film does have its risky parts in trying to give a full version of a little bit of the party lifestyle of college. I was a bit shocked, considering who the audience for this film seems to be that it went to certain lengths. it still stays in certain perimeters that feel like it will most audiences. 

This is not a film you really watch for artistic quality it’s more of a feel-good movie that simply gets to the point it’s very predictable, but it entertains fully throughout.

Lead actress Britt Robertson is one of those actresses who always seems to play in these films. She always seems to be the lead and films that are OK, but not good, and usually, She’s one of the best things in them, but then when she’s in more of a studio film, she usually is in a supporting role and she shines. Even as she just can’t seem to find the right material that would truly make her a star that would. At least she’s solid in everything that she appears in.

Just like actor, Nico Torres always seems to play the wildly, gay, best friend, in all of these Netflix-branded films. I mean it works and he has one of the most hilarious scenes in the film. though, I wouldn’t mind seeing him play. A different role shows a bit of range, but get where you fit in.

This film does have or commits to a cliché, While I admire it for being risqué to a certain extent it also has this plot point where the romantic rival for the girl who the nice guy likes and has chemistry with is always a jerk, but the film doesn’t even try to make the jerk nuanced. He’s just bad news from frame one, so you don’t see any of the charms that made the girl fall for him in the first place and maybe only shows the side when he’s not around her or when there is a rival. it would be one thing if the film at least was truthful and maybe she sees attitude-wise why this guy doesn’t work and maybe even personality but she’s just attracted to him and is trying to find something deeper than that to justify her dating and staying.

 This happens all the time in high school in movies and even regular rom-coms when the guy is just attracted to a girl more physically and stays around even though eventually wises up, I just wonder why in these types of movies when the girl is dating a jerk it is always unexplainable other than looks why she stayed with him in the first place.

Even the montage makeover scene does not come off as fun, but kind of lame as it just seems like they just dress him more plaid than before. It also doesn’t help. The only thing that seems to be wrong with the man she’s here to make over is that he’s awkward and shy, but he has boy-good looks and looks way too old to be a college student like most of the cast. 

It is particularly funny in scenes when all the college students remark on the age of the two lead characters, even though they look about the same age themselves none of them college age. 

While most of the film’s material is generic it stays entertaining and the cast truly tries to liven it up. They give it their all you just wish that there was a film to match that energy and skill maybe some stronger jokes too. Even the third act feels so ridiculous.

Grade: C 

ALL OF US STRANGERS (2023)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Andrew Haigh

Based on The Novel “STRANGERS” by: Taichi Yamada 

Cinematography: Jamie Ramsey 

Editor: Jonathan Alberts

Cast: Andrew Scott, Paul Mescal, Claire Foy, Jamie Bell

A screenwriter drawn back to his childhood home enters into a fledgling relationship with his downstairs neighbor while discovering a mysterious new way to heal from losing his parents 30 years ago.

First off before you even redistribute, this is a film that it’s best to go in blind to to get the most out of it. So please watch the film before you read this review as there will be some spoilers.

This is definitely a movie that would’ve been in my top five had I seen it in 2003 when it was released.

The film plays more like therapy sessions of unresolved issues that still exist, mentally, which can also be seen as a vivid confessional. Which might come across as a bit more theatrical or staged for some audience members. 

At heart, it’s a love story in the midst of all that develops like his relationship with his parents there’s an unknown history that is slowly brought to the forefront of its kind of acceptance, even though it does have its problems and issues by the end of the film it’s still heartbreaking nonetheless. As we witnessed the breakthrough more was revealed.

Director Andrew Haigh manages to make everything look like almost every frame could be a photograph in a museum.

Watching this film lead actor, Andrew Scott, as always can do no wrong as an actor for me at least he is similar to Sterling K. Brown, as he truly inhabits, their characters, deeper and deeper Sterling K is more of a chameleon who always has a different look with his roles and characters, Andrew Scott here the more his character opens up the more comfortable he becomes with himself, and also the more vivid the performance and memorable.

The director has a way of making the normal look extraordinary at times in simple ways.

It’s a story of nostalgia coming of age and finding peace within yourself as well as acceptance. 

At the end, it shows you can go home again not entirely. Always ghosts from the past waiting that need to be released no matter how much you want them to stay.

It’s truly hard to describe exactly the emotional strength of the film how powerful it is and where it leaves you at the end but it’s definitely worth watching. 

Grade: A 

BLUE JEAN (2022)

~ jbg ~ Leave a comment

Written & Directed By: Georgia Oakley 

Cinematography: Victor Seguin

Editor: Izabella Curry 

Cast: Rosy McEwen, Kerrie Hayes, Lucy Halliday, Lydia Page, Amy Booth-Steel, Stacy Abalogun, Lainey Shaw, Farrah Cave

England, 1988 – Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government is about to pass a law stigmatizing gays and lesbians, forcing Jean, a gym teacher, to live a double life. As pressure mounts from all sides, the arrival of a new girl at school catalyses a crisis that will challenge Jean to her core.

The film is about having to hide who you truly are, and the Lengths be forced to just to have peace in your life and peace of mind. 

As the main character sees a student of hers as a kind of kindred spirit, or a younger version of herself only much braver and not caring so much about what others think. However, she also feels the need kind of warn her and protect her against the problems, which she might be opening herself up to.

So that teacher is suspected of a rumor to be gay. She goes immediately into defense mode. alienates everyone around her and suspects that her student might be the one who is causing all of this suspicion. 

Even when she tries to act straight, it shows how bored she is and trapped, especially in a scene where she is stuck having a drink with coworkers, and there seems to be no escape yet when she’s out with her girlfriend or even her friends, we see how freeing and open they are.

The film is more about the teacher, but also the heart of the film is the student, just trying to live her life and seemingly being persecuted, especially by one girl at the school who kind of sets her up and definitely Hass to be one of the most villainous characters seen in a film in a while unexpectedly though, you also suspect that the villain might also actually be attracted herself to the other girl.

This is a film that is surprisingly affecting going in. You expect one thing, but by the end, you are just floored and are all excellent. The film is a tearjerker and kind of a heartbreaker but it’s also not an LGBTQ film that makes any character necessarily a martyr or makes the story come off more as traumatic than it needs to be.

There is tension throughout, and a lot of questioning of oneself morals and ethics in the people you surround yourself with add heart. It is also a film about embracing yourself, loving yourself, and truly letting others know your own definition, and not live up to theirs.

You must remember this film is based on recent political times not too long ago even though it works as a period piece there is still the history of prejudice and hatred that ran through countries’ governments and unfortunately people’s hearts and minds.

Grade: B