FRYBREAD FACE AND ME (2023)

Written & Directed By: Billy Luther 

Cinematography: Peter Simonite

Editor: Fred Koschmann

Cast: Keir Tillman, Charley Hogan, Sarah H. Natani, Martin Sensmeier, Kahara Hodges, Morningstar Angeline, Leilani Taliaferro, Nasheen Sleuth, Jeremiah Bitsui 

Two adolescent Navajo cousins from different worlds bond during a summer herding sheep on their grandmother’s ranch in Arizona while learning more about their family’s past and themselves.


This film came out of nowhere. It’s heartwarming as can be and shows the importance of family and our ancestors. Especially when trying to uphold traditions that are slowly being forgotten and not used at all. 

It also shows the hardships of one family and how over one summer. There seems to be a passage of importance and forgiveness. Even those family members who you can’t stand or are annoying mean something and contribute to you and your future.

Be it advice or living lessons. Throughout you have characters who are lost and are trying to find themselves and some sort of meaning. Others have it figured out and need that opportunity or push in the right direction.

Every character in this film has a tale of what’s shown and spoken and so much that is not that that shapes them. The strongest impression is from the protagonist’s uncle. who is exaggerated in trying to be masculine and not measuring up to his older brother. While also feeling trapped to a certain extent. 

Kahara Hodges makes an impression as the wild aunt who ends up being the most caring next to the grandmother. She steals her scenes. Her character defies any kind of stereotype but is so heartfelt. 

This is a film that is much better and richer to watch and discover. Some will compare it to the show RESERVATION ROAD. It deals with indigenous people like that show. Not as modern or quirky, but shows Native American people in a different light. We still see their struggle but we also see their joy, livelihood, and traditions. The curation of culture unfortunately seems to be losing Its way. 

While it stays a coming-of-age film. It is an identifiable nostalgic story. That involves growing up to the world and those around you and appreciating them. It’s a personal story from writer-director Billy Luther

And one we should be honored that he told it and shared it. As the film has so much heart and hidden joys. It’s gritty but filled with warmth and love. 

Grade: B+

A THOUSAND AND ONE (2023)

Written & Directed By: A.V. Rockwell

Cinematography: Eric K. Yue

Editor: Sabine Hoffman And Kristan Sprague

Cast: Teyana Taylor, William Catlett, Aaron Kingsley Adetola, Aven Courtney, Josiah Cross, Alicia Pilgrim, Terri Abney, Delissa Reynolds, Amelia Workman, Adriane Lenox

After unapologetic and fiercely loyal Inez kidnaps her son Terry from the foster care system, mother and son set out to reclaim their sense of home, identity, and stability, in a rapidly changing New York City.


It’s truly a coming-of-age film for most of the characters, especially the mother and the son as we see various points of their life growing up and the hardships and sacrifices. They both must make, but the undeniable thing in everything is how much they love and care for each other.

Choreographer, rapper singer, and now actress Teyana Taylor gives a dynamite lead performance. This is one of the many strengths of the film it is mostly put up on her shoulders, and she knocks it out of the park with nuance and strength.

Even though what her character does is wrong legally she’s doing it for the right reasons and you can’t hate on her for that. No, you know sooner or later as even another character Towers, it’s going to catch up with her.

What is truly appreciated and remarkable about this film is that every detail matters because it has an effect on the rest of the film and the future of the characters.

The film for some might seem like another tale of poverty porn, but it also shows the strength of family and the resilience of spirit and character. When what you do is out of love, and the many hardships you might face, especially when mistakes might define you where you are never given a chance, or at least much of one. 

It also doesn’t fall into certain clichés like it shows him the sun trying to have a relationship, but kind of is over before I can even truly start it shows the oncoming gentrification of Harlem in the microaggressions in which the owners try to seem like they’re decent or trying to help you out, but really just trying to drive you out in so that they can get tenants they prefer will overpay 

It’s like watching a fight movie I wouldn’t say hard, because of all the horrors and challenges that other films with well in, and only be about this film faces, and sees its way through it, and dealing with it as just a factor of life. You can’t stay stuck on one thing.

I also admire that the film doesn’t present the characters as perfect, but they are good-hearted and decent for the most part. It doesn’t feed into the cliché of a black man not being a father. It shows him actually taking care of this child even though biologically, it’s not truly his, and while we can admire that aspect of him, even he admits he’s not perfect.

The film might be rough around the edges, but it never quite feels like it’s going off on a false note.

Grade: B

GENIE (2023)

Directed By: Sam Boyd

Written By: Richard Curtis

Cinematography: John Guleserian 

Editor: Heather Persons

Cast: Melissa McCarthy, Paapa Essiedu, Denee Benton, Jordyn McIntosh, LaChanze, Tate Ellington, Alan Cumming, Marc Maron, Luis Guzman, Ellen Cleghorne 

The film is a fairy-tale comedy about a workaholic man who enlists the help of a magical genie to help win his family back before Christmas.


This is your typical holiday fare, where yes it’s predictable and silly, but it’s also heartwarming and tries to remind you what is important about the holiday and life In general.

What makes this one a bit more intriguing is its cuteness and Melissa McCarthy. Who may as she didn’t originate this project. Isn’t all over the production, but also plays a charismatic and fun character. Rather than trying to create an iconic comedic character who is either sloppy, stupid or over the top. Here she is playing a comedic character, but one with heart and who resembles a character and not a bunch of jokes that are needed.

Ultimately the movie seems to be about wish fulfillment, but at the end of the day, it tries to show that friendship and family are what is the most important gifts you can have in life. 

Alan Cumming seems wasted in his very few scenes. It seemed like he was a big name to be put into the cast. 

The film is written by noted screenwriter Richard Curtis the man who wrote films such as LOVE ACTUALLY, FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL, and ABOUT TIME. This might be why the film is charming more the storytelling and not so much the visuals. 

Is it the best Christmas movie you will see? No, but it does make a nice addition during the holidays to watch regularly. It will help put a smile on your face. if not put you in a total holiday mood. 

Grade: C+ 

MEG 2: THE TRENCH (2023)

Directed By: Ben Wheatley 

Written By: Dean Georgaris, Joe Hoeber & Erich Hoeber

Based On The Novel “THE TRENCH” By: Steve Alten 

Cinematography: Harris Zambarloukos 

Editor: Jonathan Amos 

Cast: Jason Statham, Cliff Curtis, Page Kennedy, Sienna Guillory, Jing Wu, Sophia Cai, Skyler Samuels, Sergio Peris Menchata, Melissanthi Mahut, Whoopie Van Raam

When a shady corporation’s illegal mining operation disturbs the ocean’s mysterious seabed, veteran deep-sea rescue diver Jonas Taylor and a research team unearth terror beyond imagination. Five years after the horrific first encounter with the unstoppable Megalodon in The Meg, Jonas must now face a ferocious old enemy for the second time. But the sea’s perplexing depths harbor prehistoric, blood-chilling secrets aching to resurface. Can Jonas confront what emerges from the trench?


The title sounds like a crossover with AQUA-MAN that some might have hoped for or the French spin-off movie only connected to the Meg universe. No such luck 

This movie is truly a sequel with not only a bigger shark but three of them. While there is some humor in the film it’s not as strong or as fun as the first film.

It might be that in the first film, there were more recognizable actors in the first film. Where as here half the actors are new. The survivors from the first film are back for this film.

One of the problems might be that a sequel wasn’t really needed. Even with this film half of the script seems made up and offers nothing new except for the same old basic plot points of betrayal and underground criminals.

Another problem is that other than a hand-to-hand action sequence on a ship for Jason Statham to show off his fighting skills. There is no other action for the first hour practically. the second half makes up for it but mostly being action, but by then you have already lost certain members if the audience. Seemingly so you can set up plot points and try to make up science for what is happening. 

Then even though faxing the sharks is bad enough yet too much like the first film. You set up a mercenary force for them to fight and outwit. Which again allows Jason Statham some more hand-to-hand action.

Then you have the sharks and big lizards start attacking innocent citizens at a resort. So that it becomes a rescue disaster movie. As well as a JURASSIC PARK knockoff and allows the film to up the limited body count it has provided so far.  

Another problem is that the special effects are so obvious. That it is hard to get scared of something you know is pretty much animated.‘you take the fear out despite the bloody violence. It still feels more like a family film, more than anything.

The saving grace of the Movie actually is actor Page Kennedy. He seems to understand the ridiculous mood of the film and manages to make his l character stand out among the

Many a few of them also understand the nature of the film but do not manage to come away as memorable only serviceable.

The first hour might be the way it Is because of director Ben Wheatley who usually directs his own independent projects making his first studio film. As a challenge or for whatever reason. He wants to get the dramatics and set up first and let it build to the action massacre. It could also be a more for-hire job and not an original project that he started. The passion might be missing 

It might be that the film is based on a novel. So the need to explain the science and technical aspects must come first. Before we can truly enjoy the senseless action that feels repetitive and never as exciting as the filmmakers are trying for. Which also amounts to a lot of exposition. 

The film was also made to appeal to a more global market. As it has quite an international cast. Which unfortunately makes it seem more like a byproduct than even an actual product. 

Grade: D+

VACATION FRIENDS 2 (2023)

Written & Directed By: Clay Tarver
Based on characters created by: Clay Tarver, Tom Mullen & Tim Mullen, Jonathan Goldstein & John Francis Daley Cinematography: Tim Suhrstedt
Editor: Tim Roche 

Cast: Lil’ Rel Howery, Yvonne Orji, John Cena, Meredith Hagner, Steve Buscemi, Carlos Santos, Ronny Chieng, Jamie Hector 

A couple who meets up with another couple while on vacation in Mexico sees their friendship take an awkward turn when they get back home.


Let me start off by saying that I surprisingly enjoyed the first film. It was better than I thought it would be. So it’s with a heavy heart that I say. I really didn’t like this one.

As it is a sequel that didn’t need to be made for any reason. The story just feels put together without any real meaning or reason. As it tries to repeat the first film.

Only in the first film, John Cena and Meredith Hagner’s characters were annoying and over the top, but eventually, it was explained why they were. It also showed that underneath they were sweethearts who really cared about their friends.

In this film, they are still annoying and it seems just to be annoying or the script requires them to be without showing any real growth at all. (Especially Hagner) They also seem a bit more cruel at times in their Jokes, particularly in the airport scenes. So that they feel unlikeable because they are truly given so little to do.

Their subplot with Steve Buscemi’s character seems so non-engaging. Even though Buscemi tries, the script lets him down at most turns.

Lil’ Rel Howery and Yvonne Orji also have nothing better to do than tag along for the ride. As they are used to them lil’ Rel seems to be the character who gets into the most trouble trying to juggle rest & relaxation with friends and an important business deal. As well as being the constant naysayer when it comes to any kind of wayward activity. Ending up doing it and being the most punished. 

The hijinks this time also feel a little more take and uninventive than the first films. This film isn’t as shocking or as heartfelt. 

It’s surprising that this failed so badly. as the film is directed by the original director who showed promise with the first film. though then again even though he helped co-write the original. Here he is on his own and it shows as the magic seems to be missing.

  It just seems like everyone here is contractually obligated and had so much fun in the first film. Let’s do it again and do it in a tropical paradise. It feels like THE HANGOVER PART 2 all over again only on a smaller streaming scale and trying not to repress the same jokes 

Grade: D 

MY BIG FAT GREEK WEDDING 2 (2016)

Directed By: Kirk Jones

Written By: Nia Vardalos

Cinematography: Jim Denault

Editor: Mark Czyzewski

Cast: Nia Vardalos, John Corbett, Michael Constantine, Lainie Kazan, Andrea Martin, Elena Kampouris, Gia Carides, Louis Mandylor, Alex Wolff, Joey Fatone, Bess Meisler, Rita Wilson, John Stamos, Rob Riggle, Mark Margolis, Ian Gomez, Bruce Gray, Jayne Eastwood

Still working in her parents’ Greek restaurant, Toula Portokalos’ daughter, Paris, is growing up. She is getting ready to graduate high school and Toula and Ian are experiencing marital issues. When Toula’s parents find out they were never officially married, another wedding is in the works. Can this big, fat, Greek event help to bring the family together?


It could be the fact that before this film a few year earlier Nia Vardalos tried to turn this into a franchise with a follow up television series 

Considering they tried s sitcom after the first film this feels like they just took story threads or ideas from there and tried to make a movie with a framing device and theme

As this film feels all over the place, like it want the audience to be updated on the families notice after all these years with her other film Connie and Carla not doing well wanted a guaranteed hit

It’s a feel good film with no real stakes. so while it’s nice to see the characters again they are left with little to nothing to really do as we just enjoy and laugh at their antics

The fil m can be considered fun for those who l led the original

Though the first film was better content wise as it had a love story and a story of self Confidence. That was familiar and well structured and could be identifiable by mining a culture under represented and giving them representation even with it’s stereotypes that come off as loving

It might have been seen as a clash in as the audience for the first film has come of age and are dealing with their teenage children and the prospect of them leaving the nest. So again a bit updated and identifiable for that generation 

The problem is as familiar as the first film was; this one jsit feels generic. A script that tries to have a best of or greatest hits quality to it’s scenes the first film the characters came off as quirky here they come off more as caricatures of their former selves playing it more for laughs. 

You could say that this feels like a victory lap. While it keeps it’s innocence and a little charm. That keeps it safe 

Grade: C 

COBWEB (2023)

Directed By: Samuel Bodin 

Written By: Chris Thomas Devlin 

Cinematography: Philip Lozano 

Editor: Kevin Greutert and Richard Riffaud 

Cast: Woody Norman, Cleopatra Coleman, Anthony Starr, Lizzy Caplan 

An eight-year-old boy tries to investigate the mysterious knocking sounds that are coming from inside the walls of his house, unveiling a dark secret that his sinister parents have kept hidden from him.


This film feels like Stephen King because it takes place in what looks like a small town suburb and its primary location for most of the movie is the boy’s house now of course adventures outside of it but yeah, that’s a little rare in the film 

That is also the reason why I might be a little bit M night Shymalan as again set in a small town but there by choice. Not to mention the secrets you can hide in plain sight. 

The film has a bit of the vibe of the movie PARENTS, a movie that I don’t think gets enough love. It’s a movie that scared me a lot as a child with the possibility of an overactive imagination and horrors not even contemplated. While through the eyes of a child.

There is a reason it is being called the 2023 version of BARBARIAN, as it reminds you of that film and the others I have previously named this far.

I’m not going to lie here and say that it’s one of the greatest films, but it’s one of those that for me well remembered because it gave you a child’s point of you. It scared the heck out of me as a kid it builds tension slowly, and while it was more of a dark comedy, it did add that element of you’re supposed to trust your parents, but can you in certain times or what is with these mysterious things that they do that might to the world be perfectly innocent but you seem like there’s a deep, dark secret or something wrong is happening. A lot of those same aspects are on display here only stronger and a lot more obvious.

Dealing with parents who are supposed to guide you, but at turns seem evil or even way too mean. Though they say it’s for your own good. Yet keep obvious secrets from you. Then tell you it’s all in your head whatever conspiracy. While your friends not ally is a nice teacher. Who can only help you so much, without l getting in trouble themselves. Though like your parents they are supposed to be your guiding light. Thought at times can be one of the major problems.

As it goes along, you think oh, this is the worst that could happen, then raise the stakes as that it’s like oh another scenario where you think oh now this is the worst that can happen. Then it gets worse again, and so on, and so on. 

It manages a lot in under 90 minutes and that is including the fact that it starts off slow.

This is one of those films you think about more after you watch the film as it stays on your mind.  As while you are watching you are busy reacting.

The film works best the less you know and is scarier when they hint at things instead of completely revealing them. 

Grade: B- 

SANCTUARY (2023)

Directed By: Zachary Wigon 
Written By: Micah Bloomberg
Cinematography: Ludovica Isidori
Editor: Kate Brokaw and Lance Edmonds

Cast: Christopher Abbott, Margaret Qualley 

Follows a dominatrix and Hal, her wealthy client, and the disaster that ensues when Hal tries to end their relationship.


The film seems simple at first and will be pretty cut and dry storywise and sticks to it but you get involved and ultimately lost in the film, game, and characters 

The film reminds one of Christopher Abbott’s previous film and performance in the movie PIERCING only less life and death or violence, just darkly comedic with hints of violence. 

The films have the similarity of involving a sec worker and power plays as well seeming to be mostly bound to a hotel room only the previous film left the room 

The director Zachary Wigon adds style so as to not make this seem boring and to liven up the experience.

Truly a psychosexual domination film of games 

The film truly kicks off once Margaret Qualley’s character takes off her wig. Though the film plays more theatrical for the stage rather than a film. It keeps the Audience interested more in Qualley’s character and performance as she truly is the wildcard to Abbott’s more straight man’s performance. 

His threats always keep turning hollow and truly show the weakness of his character, Especially compared to her. 

This is Margaret Qualley’s best performance so far though probably not her most memorable which for most might still be ONCE UPON A TIME… IN HOLLYWOOD.

She is smarter than him because she has had to work her way up. whereas Abbott’s character has done what he has been told but resented that work while coasting along it and its features.

Also can be seen as a comparison and power play from a director/writer and actress who might have decided to go off script and prove their defiant character and talent 

You can see the characters’ codependency with one another, one reluctantly. the other more willingly and knowingly. You can see it from the many times either could truly walk away but seems willing or fighting to prolong it against their so-called requests. As it easily could end plenty of times. 

A kind of love story when it comes to power, communication, and trust with another person who knows you the most or at least your secrets 

The ending feels like a throwback to a classic comedy and more of a fantasy or dream than reality 

The film gets more intense as it goes along. Like the characters no matter how hard I resisted, continuously felt myself falling for the film even though or against my will

Grade: B 

BUG (2006)

Directed By: William Friedkin

Written By: Tracy Letts (Based upon his play)

Cinematography: Michael Grady 

Editor: Darrin Navarro 

Cast: Ashley Judd, Michael Shannon, Harry Connick Jr., Lynn Collins, Brian F. O’Byrne 

Having escaped her abusive ex-husband Goss, recently released from state prison, Agnes, a lonely waitress with a tragic past moves into a sleazy, rundown motel. Her lesbian co-worker R.C. introduces her to Peter, a peculiar, paranoiac drifter and they begin a tentative romance. However, things aren’t always as they appear and Agnes is about to experience a claustrophobic nightmare reality as the bugs begin to arrive.


This is a love story between two damaged individuals. As we can see from the beginning Ashley Judd’s character is not only lonely but also seems to be more willing to put up with abuse and the nature of whoever she is dating. As her ex, she has a court order o. Keeps coming over to beat her up and steal her money. 

So it’s not too shocking that soon after being with this new man that she is introduced to, she starts to suffer from the same psychosis.

The couple could be compared to what happens when two drug addicts get together. Where they seem to live off each other and in their own world. Watching this movie they do come off as meth addicts. Even in scenes later we see that they have been freebasing also. Something g strangely even his psychiatrist takes a turn with. 

though there is a more artistic rather than erotic sex scene. Which director William Friedkin has been doing constantly in his later films. As overly erotic as KILLER JOE was, the seductive or sexy scenes seemed more like going for pretty and meant much more. It could be that both these films come from the theater world. So these are the only moments where he can truly try to make it more cinematic with his own vision. 

It took me some time to watch this film over the years. So the anticipation builds up. So that when finally watching the film it is tamer than expected and feels like it needs to be seen on the big screen to truly feel the film. Unfortunately, I didn’t, but the second half of the film is truly graphic and disturbing. 

The film didn’t live up to certain expectations but it is effective to a certain degree. It definitely helps if you come into the movie blindly 

Which is why I believe the second half is so disturbing is that the first half has a few shocks but stays mundane. So the lunacy of the second half not only wakes up the Audience but disrupts them out of comfort and expectation. 

We also watch the breakdown of Ashley Judd’s Character whom we truly feel sorry for from the beginning though we also see how submissive she is.

The last act comes across as downright artistic when it comes to production design and the acting. 

Though he had been a working actor this Is the movie that truly made Michael Shannon a star or put him More on that path. After so far a career of bit roles and more theatrical work.

Harry Connick Jr. Even plays against type in this film. As Judd’s abusive not quite ex-husband 

Not your typical horror film or thriller. It is more disturbing about damaged people damaging themselves and each other. Involving those who are unlucky enough to cross their paths. 

It ends up not being what you first thought when you sat down to watch it, but luckily something much deeper.

There is some beautiful filmmaking here making the mundane interesting and you can feel its theatrical roots. The director and cast truly make the film feel bigger than the location it seems to be stuck in and make the hotel room seem labyrinthian 

Grade: B- 

THE JUSTICE OF BUNNY KING (2021)

Directed By: Gaysorn Thavat
Written By: Sophie Henderson
Story By: Gaysorn Thavat, Sophie Henderson and Gregory King
Cinematography: Ginny Loane
Editor: Cushla Dillon

Cast; Essie Davis, Thomasan McKenzie, Lively Nili, Birdie Sisson, Amelie Baynes, Erroll Shand 

A triumph over adversity tale about women fighting their way back from the bottom of society.


This is a sad melodrama that seems to drag its main character down. Every chance she gets. There seems to be very little reason why. Even when it gets more explained toward the end.

The film has nothing truly wrong with it. Except you feel like you have seen it all before. Dealing with material one would usually witness from television star trying to get a big screen career going, or one from the 1980’s who couldn’t get a big screen film getting talked into a television movie from the studio she works for.

Either way, the spotlight when it comes to this film belongs to Essie Davis. Who goes above and beyond in her performance as the lead. She is phenomenal. You can’t take your eyes off of her. She is truly what saves this film.

It’s a shame as this is an example of a performance that deserves a better film around them. She Has layers of depth that the film seems to lack in the long run. She is truly the only reason to watch this film. Unless you want to see her reunite with Thomaszin McKenzie her co-star From TRUE HISTORY OF THE KELLY GANG. Who is also the only other recognizable name and the only other character who gets significant screen time.

The film does touch on unfortunate subjects such as parents caring more about their romantic relationships and partners than their children. Especially when It’s obviously said partner isn’t behaving right. Yet is the alpha and brings in the money. So the parent becomes more submissive and stops thinking for themselves. That issue is what causes the major downfall of the lead character. Who has never had much luck it seems in the first place.

Though who always shows much love and caring. Not to mention work ethic. The film unfortunately in the end for all the emotions it tries to evoke. Comes across more as a time-killing tear-jerker.

Grade: C+