MAFIA MAMMA (2023)

Directed By: Catherine Hardwicke

Written By: Michael J. Feldman and Debbie Jhoon

Based on a story By: Amanda Sthers

Cinematography: Patrick Murguia

Editor: Waldemar Centeno 

Cast: Toni Collette, Monica Bellucci, Alessandro Bressanello, Eduardo Scarpetta, Tommy Rodger,  Tim Daish, Sophia Nomvette, Gulio Corso, Dora Romano, Francesco Mastroianni 

An American mom inherits her grandfather’s mafia empire in Italy. Guided by the firm’s consigliere, she hilariously defies everyone’s expectations as the new head of the family business.


At first, this film seems like it would be fun but it’s more a female audience-friendly culture comedy. Where the humor is not found in having a female mob boss but in having a middle-aged divorced housewife become a mob boss or go about trying to run a crime empire out of nowhere.

This would’ve been a high-concept comedy in the ’80s, ’90s, or maybe early 2000s that would’ve maybe been more of a star vehicle or at least offered up something a little more daring.

The film has a few laughable moments, but for the most part seems uninventive and uninspired, even adding in a romance aspect that proves to be more of a fantasy aspect of the movie turning more into a midlife crisis change of life types scenario.

No truthfully, there is more sizzle and star, Tony Collette, and costar Monica Bellucci’s scenes together that have a bit of flirtation and eroticism to it that could’ve made the film a little more risky, especially when there is seen where Bellucci straddles Colette.

The film is fine and simple, but it just feels so uninspired. They had a title and they just went with it and tried to make things up around it where most of the male characters are either Sexists or idiots or untrustworthy. 

Such as the scenes with her ex-husband, there was a way of making him more despicable and a loser rather than the obvious that the film chooses to go to where you wonder what she ever saw him if she was not a teen parent and a shotgun marriage.

Not to mention a film that is set in Italy. It’s not very picturesque. it seems like it was filmed in an indoor sets. That doesn’t look very expensive or that luscious. 

Also, there aren’t that many comedy set pieces or even that many action sequences the ones that they do have seem poorly set up. This film is more for the MY BIG FAT GREEK WEDDING crowd than anything.

I really wanted to like the film as I like the main cast. Usually, Toni Collette can do no wrong, and it is a pleasure anytime Monica Belluci is on screen. Yet, the only time the film is close to its potential is in the performance of Sophia Nomvette as Colette’s best friend. Who turns a typical sassy African-American best friend role and runs with it to utter hilarity. One only wishes that she was more of the film.

Grade: D+

DEAR SANTA (2024)

Directed By: Bobby Farrelly

Written By: Ricky Blitt and Peter Farrelly 

Story By: Ricky Blitt, Peter Farrelly and Dan Ewen

Cinematography: C. Kim Miles

Editor: Julie Garces

Cast: Jack Black, Robert Timothy Smith, Post Malone, Brianne Howey, Keegan Michael Key, Jaden Carson Baker, Hayes MacArthur, P.J. Byrne, Kyle Gass 

When a young boy mails his Christmas wish list to Santa with one crucial spelling error, a devilish Jack Black arrives to wreak havoc on the holidays.


This seems like a film that was made to go to theaters as a high-concept comedy and ended up on streaming. Which one is thankful for because if this hadn’t made it to theaters, only you could see why people would be displeased with it.

It seems like more films that should be released in the theaters are being released in streaming, and many movies that are streaming only could have been released in the theaters and actually made a profit and had better notoriety. 

Then again, it seems like there are more expensive high-concept films being made in general that actually don’t look interesting because they seem more reliant on special effects and fantasy storytelling rather than the talents of their recognizable stars.

At this point, it seems like Jack Black has decided to mostly star in children’s films or films aimed at families and young teens that are a little risky but pretty much clean and well-centered going for the too-crass or too-gross humor.

Now this film is perfectly fine for families to watch as a holiday film, except that it just feels so planned and over the top corny to a certain degree no matter how hard Jack tries or even the rest of the cast it just feels so lightweight by the numbers.

I will credit the filmmakers as this could’ve easily been a more mean, spirited, and gross film. It ends up being a little more moralistic and a bit emotional definitely more than anything else. . 

Though I will admit, there was only one scene that was truly funny and almost hilarious that should help up the audience as the rest of the film is pretty basic and lacks any laugh-out-loud moments.

Then again keep in mind I’m not the ideal audience member for this film. It’s not necessarily my cup of tea and this film is made or directed by Bobby Farrelly of THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY and SHALLOW HAL Fame so this is a comedy with him showing restraint it should be noted.

It’s a film yeah if you just are in the mood for a kind of empty holiday film that tries to have the heart go for it, but unfortunately, it’s not anything special as you might’ve hoped.

Considering the cast and filmmakers. This should have been better or at least a lot more enjoyable. 

Grade: D

FOUR SAMOSAS (2022)

Written & Directed By: Ravi Kapoor

Cinematography: Akashi Raj 

Editor: Anisha Acharya 

Cast: Venk Potura, Sonal Shah, Sharmita Bhattacharya, Nirvan Patniak, Sujata Day, Karan Soni, Summer Bishil, Maya Kapoor, Ravi Kapoor 

An unmotivated South Asian American rapper, along with three other first-time thieves, plans a heist on a grocery store owned by his ex-girlfriend’s father, in order to steal her wedding diamonds and disrupt her pending engagement.


This film is inspired by or in the same style as a Wes Anderson film with a little NAPOLEON DYNAMITE mixed in, only set in a South Asian community in a small town. 

It maintains a dry deadpan goofy innocent humor and comedic antics throughout. As the film takes a look at a community yet stays ridiculous and pure throughout.

It manages to make a small town feel epic with so little. Exposing its own universe and still being a bit romantic. Even as it maintains pretty low steaks and feels more character-based than plot-based.

The film has its own charms that retain a sweetness to it all. 

Just like BOTTLE ROCKET, it revolves around a ridiculous heist that exposes their neurosis and gives them a chance to run away from their own individual problems Or dilemmas and bonds them more but also exposes that they need to move on with their lives.

But they are so likable you want to see them have more adventures and see how they grow and change though hope they don’t at their core 

Grade: B 

BAD SANTA 2 (2016)

Directed By: Mark Waters

Written By: Johnny Rosenthal And Shauna Cross 

Based on characters Created by: Glen Ficarra & John Requa 

Cinematography: Theo Van De Sande 

Editor: Travis Sittard

Cast: Billy Bob Thornton, Tony Cox, Kathy Bates, Christina Hendricks, Ryan Hansen, Brett Kelly, Jenny Zigrino, Octavia Spencer, Mike Starr

Fueled by cheap whiskey, greed, and hatred, Willie teams up once again with his angry little sidekick, Marcus, to knock off a Chicago charity on Christmas Eve.


The worst part of this film is that it’s an unnecessary sequel. I don’t know if it was the studio’s idea or something that was pitched, but the first one could’ve stayed a classic as this film ends up being bad not as bad as you might think but pretty much, disappointing

Luckily, it’s not a straight-to-streaming or direct video by having some other person star in the film or be some kind of distant relative or only getting the supporting players back while not being able to get the star Billy Bob Thornton, who seems pretty much auto-pilot. As he has played this type of role many times before it’s hard to differentiate them sometimes other than the other antiheroes are jerks that he has played in comedies have some pride, and are usually trying to hide the other part of themselves or here what you see is what you get.

The only surprise in the film is that Kathy Bates agreed to play a supporting role in it as it just seems like more of the same from the first film, though it seems here it tries to be meaner and more over the top and its nastiness and humor is definitely more sexual 

It’s pretty much the same story new city, where the plan seems to basically be the same only shifting loyalties, even though no one trusts each other in the first place. 

It also seems to be darker and more low-budgeted again makes you wonder who was really demanding this or deemed it necessary. It looks dirtier. 

Even Christina Hendricks seems cast more to capitalize on her bombshell looks and does play a character in the film who is Ingal to the plot, but doesn’t really have much to do except be a sex object for an actress of her caliber you would have more to do or at least be better written. She also seems here to give Billy Bob Thornton’s character the closest thing to a kind of love interest that he’s going to get. She is the most likable character in the film.

There are some scenes that can be funny. There’s not enough to truly make a necessary feature. One would warn fans of the first film. You can skip this as it’s the same movie only cheaper and you know the characters more so you know what to expect if anything it kind of darkens, the first film offers a cheap knockoff that’s familiar and almost similar to the first film only with not as big names think the hangover sequels.

It feels like a movie, a studio mandated more than they’re actually being a need or reason by the filmmakers or cast to return even though it’s shocking considering the material was so controversial and risky when the first film came out. Though it might be watered down in many ways, the jokes pack a little more mean-hearted venom

Grade: C- 

FRED CLAUS (2007)

Directed By: David Dobkin

Written By: Dan Fogelman

Story By: Jessie Nelson and Dan Fogelman

Cinematography: Remi Adefarasin

Editor: Mark Livolsi

Cast: Vince Vaughn, Paul Giamatti, Kevin Spacey, Rachel Weisz, John Michael Higgins, Elizabeth Banks, Kathy Bates, Miranda Richardson, Chris ‘Ludacris’ Bridges, Bobb’e J. Thompson

Always living in the shadow of his younger and utterly popular brother, Nicholas–or the one and only, Santa Claus–the polar opposite of his holy sibling, Fred Claus, now faces an unforeseen predicament that drags him all the way up to the frozen North Pole to beg for Santa’s help. However, there’s a catch. To get off the hook, Fred must work his fingers to the bone along with the jolly elves during the hectic pre-Christmas Eve period, against the backdrop of a thorough and merciless efficiency inspection. Can the wayward brother Fred save himself, and above all, Christmas?


This film has very few factors going for it. The Christmas morning scene is the only time this film truly feels believable and shows the beauty and heartwarming side of Christmas. It’s about family, magic, happiness, and amazement, and that one scene finally touches what the whole film is supposed to be about.

What comes before is more of a shallow exercise that wants to be heartwarming but comes across as conniving and faking the funk.

The problem is that it builds up this whole fantasy realm and lower, but doesn’t exactly quite explain it or give the rules so that’s your loss so that you can just throw anything in there. sort of like Vince Vaughn is supposed to be the older brother of Santa Claus, but they never quite explain how long Santa Claus has been in his current position except that he was born for it. Even in a certain part of the movie remember that a certain character wanted a gift way back in 1968 but Vince Vaughn is the older brother has he been away from the North Pole and living in the real world and why doesn’t he age or have any certain magical powers, that he pretty much struggling for the most part and afraid to get into a romantic relationship.

That last part helps when it comes to explaining his mentality thinking he’s afraid of attachments because he’s on the out with his family so he doesn’t really trust anyone even the people he should because he’s all out for himself but throughout the movie learns to love his family, who have always just wanted the best for him And others and together for greater cause.

Which is a great message. You just wish that the film had bothered you. To find a plausible and more believable way there. it just feels like a comedy built around the holiday built around the persona of star Vince Vaughn. He is a good actor and works well as a fast-talking hustler as that is his stick so it’s no surprise to find out that most of his lines were the result of improv.

However, that style doesn’t quite match the material as it’s better in his more R-rated juvenile comedies rather than a family film as it just makes him seem more like a bumbling liar half the time or a bumbling man. One who would never believe.

Kevin Spacey makes no sense as an efficiency expert but who sent him that’s never explained. Why is he hell-bent on taking down Santa and what was he going to replace the North Pole in the factory with never explained how to get away with his plan at parts and times he even cheats to sabotage Santa. So you would think the powers that be if let’s say this word to become a religious film when they see that and Disapprove?

Understandably these are things you’re not supposed to think of when watching this film but the shenanigans that the film produces you can’t help but think that. One this is obviously made for children and families. There should still be some explanation rather than feeling like the film is like the main character making up things on the spot.

I don’t want to be a Grinch. The cast tries Vince Vaughn, whose movies can be hit or miss nearly seems like for the most part. He isn’t sleepwalking through this role, but he doesn’t seem that enthusiastic all the time to be there so he does bother to put in high energy, this just wasn’t the material for him.

It’s rare that a scene works sort of like when he goes to therapy for brothers who don’t feel they get enough credit as their more famous brothers that was funny but could have gone a bit over the top and been funnier, but it feels like it’s holding back mainly because it’s a family film, but also exposes the film as being more of a series of skits with an overall story rather than a true film.

Grade: D

HERETIC (2024)

Written & Directed By: Scott Beck & Bryan Woods 

Cinematography: Chung-Hoon Chung

Editor: Justin Li 

Cast: Hugh Grant, Sophie Thatcher, Chloe East, Topher Grace, Elle Young 

Two young religious women are drawn into a game of cat-and-mouse in the house of a strange man.


This is a film. One wishes they could’ve made it as at first it seems so simple, but as it goes along, you realize how twisted everything is and that it also exists on a delicate balance

The script is intricately written and can go a million ways at any moment. Luckily it stays on a certain path makes it all the more intriguing. 

There will be many who will be In Tune with its debates and theories. At least in the first half of the film. 

It’s a tight thriller that sues its Location inventively and makes it claustrophobic. As with the design of the location the Film, characters, and story offer up their mazes to try and solve. The camerawork by Chung-Hoon Chung makes the spaces seem sumptuous and a world unto themselves. 

Hugh Grant finally gets a role where he doesn’t have to play off either his public persona or what audiences know him for he gets to play a role with the recent villain role, which gives him some really good meat on which to chew and show off his skills and remind you that he is a good actor.

As he shows the human equivalent of mansplaining. That most women will identify with if ever had a date, friend, or family.

A member who wants to show off his smarts and theories and is truly trying to impress about a subject you are not necessarily interested in but must show superiority in. 

It’s not perfect in the third act. That is where the film gets a little wobbly and brings the film back down to earth and reality. It is impossible to keep up the momentum Of the first half completely without having to offer some Explanations. as well as offer the audience the release that they desire. To make it mroenofna crowd pleaser. 

I won’t call it a fun ride but one that keeps your interest throughout and will want to have conversations about after. Even if not as shocking as you might expect. 

The writer-directors Scott Beck and Bryan Woods have truly made a film worth investing your time and attention. Much better than their previous films, A QUIET PLACE which they wrote and 65 Which they wrote and directed and this film Is leaps and bounds above the special effects-laden 65 starring Adam Driver. 

Grade: B 

THE WATCHERS (2024)

Written & Directed By: Ishana Shyamalan 

Based On the Novel By: A.M. Shine 

Cinematography: Eli Arenson 

Editor: Job Ter Burg 

Cast: Dakota Fanning, Georgina Campbell, Olsen Fouere, Oliver Finnegan, Alister Brammer, John Lynch, Siobhan Hewlett 

A young artist gets stranded in an extensive, immaculate forest in western Ireland, where, after finding shelter, she becomes trapped alongside three strangers, stalked by mysterious creatures each night.


This film is disappointing now much will be sad because this film is from the daughter of M. Night Shyamalan, Ishana Shyamalan. There have already been calls of nepotism or Nepo baby feeling that she only got a big studio release because of who her father is and the fact that he also produced the film. 

Now the film is in a similar style of being something supernatural and mysterious, and having a twist. Unfortunately, it doesn’t make good on its prints as the trailer for this film intrigued me as you didn’t exactly know what was happening. She also follows him and his more recent footsteps of adapting, a little-known or well-hidden novel for the big screen that if not for some research you would think would be an original script. That would work for her father, as his name comes with a certain pedigree and is bigger than any source material.

Once you watch the film and the story is fully explained there would be less mystery, but the problem isn’t that there is less mystery. It’s that it just doesn’t seem the greatest thought out as the script is barely subtle, and along the way becomes a bit predictable or if not predictable it’s nothing you haven’t seen before and other films so that here it just feels like a hodgepodge of ideas combine together to try and make the story work.

It feels more like a first draft than a fully thought-through and finished story. There seems so much potential in the setup, never quite comes together in a meaningful or sensible way, Which is especially shocking considering it’s based on a novel.

The direction is quite inspired and the cinematography is tight, but the rest of the film feels so empty. It’s one of these films that by the end. You don’t really care. You’re just happy that it’s coming to an end. 

Rarely offers surprises or suspense you watch as it goes along and hope it will get better along the way with its twist and it rarely does.

There is a glimmer of hope and promise here, though tighter scripting and a better follow-through will be needed. Especially to follow either in her father’s footsteps or even the car out an original artistic voice of her own.

Grade: D 

IMMACULATE (2024)

Directed By: Michael Mohan

Written By: Andrew Lobel 

Cinematography: Elisha Christian 

Editor: Christian Masini 

Cast: Sydney Sweeney, Simona Tobasco, Benedetta Porcaroli, Alavaro Morte, Giorgio Colangeli, Dora Romano, Giulia Heathfield Di Renzi, Giampiero Judica 

Cecilia, a woman of devout faith, is warmly welcomed to the picture-perfect Italian countryside where she is offered a new role at an illustrious convent. But it becomes clear to Cecilia that her new home harbors dark and horrifying secrets.


This film came out at an interesting time. It seemed to be on the heels of the similarly themed THE FIRST OMEN. Though at least this can be considered more an original than a prequel.

This one despite having a rising star in the main role and own in a supporting role. Comes across as more heartfelt ultimately. However, what truly makes it memorable is the surprising and somewhat brutal third act

Though the film offers violence here and there in act two. It seems like there is a lot of build-up going Along the way keeping scenes just intriguing enough. To keep you interested until it finally becomes more than what you expected.

Though the third act is very dark which might disturb some viewers and the reasoning behind some decisions and plans. Seems either silly or like it would only exist in a movie.

Sydney Sweeney is convincing in her leading role. She stretches her acting muscles and is not really dependent on her looks or body as much.

As the film is directed by Michael Mohan who has collaborated on the film THE VOYEURS from a few years ago and the show EVERYTHING SUCKS. Which is where this reviewer first saw her. So this offers her a big screen leading role and a director she trusts. 

This makes sense as this film comes off as a starring role. Made to appeal to the audiences’ fandom of an actor or actress and seemingly written for them or someone of that magnitude. Rather than truly a character role. 

The film offers exactly what you might expect and gives enough scares and violence to keep the horror audience happy. Other than a good ending it doesn’t offer anything that rises above basic.

Though a smaller production, it does feel a little more like a breath of fresh air as this film doesn’t go for campier or trashier aspects of similar material and more recent films.

Grade: C+

SNACK SHACK (2024)

Written & Directed By: Adam Rehmeier

Cinematography: Jean-Philippe Bernier

Editor: Justin Krohn

Cast: Conor Sherry, Gabriel LaBelle, Mika Abdalla, Nick Robinson, David Costabile, Gillian Vigman, June Gentry, April Clark 

Nebraska City, 1991, two best friends get the chance to run the swimming pool snack shack, that later comes to be the perfect scenario for transgression, fun, personal discovery, and romance.


This film was kind of a quiet victory as it slowly rolled out and released a lot of people praised this film so I took my time before watching it and I have to say it’s heartwarming and a good film.

Even though it’s familiar, it doesn’t talk down to its audience and while being rebellious it still feels a bit suburban where it feels perfect for teens, even though set in 1991 as it gives them respect and hints of a little bit of nostalgia for the audience watching it.

Casting Nick Robinson in this film was a mini-stroke of genius for audience members who remember him starring in another coming-of-age summer film called KINGS OF SUMMER here it feels like he is passing the torch to the actors here.

This film has mostly what you would expect a romantic triangle and a love story best friends who might be growing apart, rebellious against strict parents who mean the best for their children, but also seem like strict disciplinarians for no reason smoking, drinking gambling, and scoring 

Though I do applaud the characters for being so financial and business-minded at such an early age and being go-getters, but also go a little wild, not only for the profits but even the ideas.

The film and the characters have a certain charm that carries the film to the finish line and goes over the audience. It seems a little more random even though you know that they’ll probably come the way in which they are handled seems a bit looser.

The film isn’t as plot-structured.  as a lot of these summer coming-of-age films usually are and there’s no real villain or deadline or person that they’re fighting against. It’s just the lazy hazy days of summer where one day everything seems to be normal and slow and then the next day full of excitement, then something shattering the next. There doesn’t seem to be an ultimate plan.

Though the film has many female characters, there’s only one female man, and it would’ve been nice if maybe there were some others to provide either commentary support or temptation, even if the main female is quite fetching so that you can understand why the boys are quite head over heels for her. Luckily they give her enough personality to be a character who could stand on her though rarely give her a chance played by the impressive Mika Abdalla.

It took me quite a while to recognize Gabriel LaBelle as the character of Mike. He played in another coming-of-age film MEET THE FABELMANS starring as a younger version of Steven Spielberg who directed the film. So once again he is in another coming-of-age story as one of the leads. Quite impressive and strong character. 

What is also impressive is that the film is written and directed by Adam Rehmeier, whose previous films have been riskier and, shockingly, he goes here for more of a family film vibe that while it has its vices never out of place or even racy. It’s nice to see his range as this is an enjoyable independent film just as his previous film KIDS IN AMERICA was enjoyable but a lot more hard-core and punk rock and its rebellion.

Won’t say believe the hype that it is a sweet surprise of the easy-going nostalgic coming-of-age cinema. 

Grade: B

INCOMING (2024)

Written & Directed By Dave Chernin & John Chernin

Cinematography: Ricardo Diaz

Editor: Josh Crockett and Elizabeth Praino

Cast: Mason Thames, Ali Gallo, Isabella Ferreira, Thomas Barbusca, Kaitlin Olson, Bobby Cannavale, Raphael Alejandro, Ramon Reed, Bardia Seiri, Scott Macarthur, Victoria Moroles, Loran Gray

Four freshmen navigate the terrors of adolescence at their first-ever high school party.


This is a raunchy teenage comedy that feels like it is more made for teenagers of today, but in its own strange way, it still has a kind of innocence to it.

It will feel familiar for those who have seen plenty of team coming-of-age comedies, but it feels like it belongs more to this next generation as a kind of passing along the lines.

It’s raunchy in language, but it never quite feels exploited of strange and it just feels like a generally fun time and offers to teach lessons and its own rough way.

It is mostly all talk, plenty of action, but very little play and luckily no sex scenes. It stays pretty woke and equilateral though there is a surprisingly little bit of nudity that seems to come out of nowhere and is shocking, but that is as raunchy as the film gets other than language and a brief surprising sex scene out of nowhere. 

That proves at certain points that the movie is more for shock and giggles.

The adult cast here is mainly the big names and full of pros with Kaitlyn Olsen and Bobby Cavale, who plays more of a comedic supporting character that he seems to be getting expertise. This at least seems to have somewhat of a conscience, and it’s just more lonely than anything. 

Even though for all of its juvenile humor, this film can be quite charming and keeps an innocence about itself that stays not only entertaining but interesting throughout and truly tries to push the envelope at times, but never as far as one would expect or put it truly over the top.

No, the storylines and character motivations will feel familiar as it feels like a mashup of different teen movies. I’ll put in one, but luckily, it’s not a spoof or parody of those films. 

Though with the Netflix sheen. It comes across at times as trying to fill a niche for an audience or making it feel so businesslike rather than with a heart. 

All in all the film is a good time.

Grade: B-