DE-LOVELY (2004)

Directed By: Irwin Winkler 
Written By: Jay Cocks 
Cinematography: Tony Pierce-Roberts 
Editor: Julie Monroe 

Cast: Kevin Kline, Ashley Judd, Jonathan Pryce, Kevin McKidd, Kevin McNally, Allen Corduner, James Wilby, Keith Allen, Taylor Hamilton, Angie Hill, Natalie Cole, Sheryl Crow, Elvis Costello, Robbie Williams, Alanis Morrisette

Inspecting a magical biographical stage musical, composer Cole Porter reviews his life and career with his wife, Linda.


This was a film it has taken me a while to watch. As I knew more about the soundtrack than the movie. It’s one of those I always meant to watch it eventually type of movies where you feel you have to be in a certain mood to watch or can never think of when specifically needing something new to watch. Not has it ever truly been recommended to me by anyone. So I finally decided to take the plunge.

The film feels like how I described it. It’s on and certainly entertaining and thinks of itself as smart. Though it never truly elicits any true emotions from the audience. So it never truly connects and comes across more as if you were watching a visual biography that tries to be flashy and inventive.

As the film and story are preset like Cole Porter is creating a musical of life and constantly having to deal with a director who has his own vision or wants even the harder more private stuff to be part of it. As they both look back upon his life from the director’s Chairs in the audience. 

The film is presented as a love story between Cole and his wife. Even as he is bi-sexual or more homosexual.

Kevin Kline shines in the main role. He is truly what makes the film Memorable. As he seems to go above and beyond to make it work. He already is usually one of the crowning achievements in any film. Only wished he would have had more starring roles when he was younger. Though it always seemed hard to find a place to put him in films. Which might be why he stuck more to theater over the years. He has a theatrical way of speaking at times, but so does John Lithgow, and look at how many legendary roles he held down. Though maybe only a few as the leading man. 

As they go through the numbers some are more stage-bound and others more in life outdoors. Though always feeling staged. As it stages at least half of its scenes in theaters of some kind. 

The film reminds the audience of ALL THAT JAZZ. Only that movie was based on and directed by its subject Bob Fosse. This film never quite ends up as warts and all, dramatic or hard-hitting. That film unfortunately never as inventive either. 

This film could work as a Broadway show all Its own. Though it never quite comes across as grand as it should. 

As it is based on a true story and biography. We all know what is going to happen. It telegraphs its moves at times in true dramatic cliches. Though comes across as quite elegant as a prestige film.

Irwin Winkler is the director and he isn’t bad here he just unfortunately makes the material feel basic. It never quite has the flair of the person it is based on. 

It’s a prestige project that tries to be playful. That is more meant for awards season. Yet not of that caliber. Though it is fun to see music superstars of the time period, singing classic songs. 

It’s a good presentation but never quite feels deep enough. For us to care or to be moved. Once it finally hits home and hard is at the end. You will come out of the film humming and singing and wanting to hear more of his songs.

Grade: C+

GUILTY BY SUSPICION (1991)

Written & Directed By: Irwin Winkler
Cinematography: Michael Ballhaus 
Editor: Priscilla Nedd 

Cast: Robert DeNiro, Annette Benning, Patricia Wettig, Chris Cooper, George Wendt, Adam Baldwin, Tom Sizemore, Martin Scorsese, Barry Primus, Sam Wanamaker, Luke Edwards, Ben Piazza, Stuart Margolin, Roxann Biggs, Allan Rich, Illenana Douglas, Stephen Root, Jon Tenney, Jonathan Ames 

David Merrill, a successful director, has spent the last couple of years working on movies overseas. He returns right in the middle of the McCarthy-era Communist witch-hunt that was sweeping through Hollywood. When first approached by the ‘inquisitors’ he rebuffs them, not realizing how much influence they have. He soon finds that he can’t get work, having been blacklisted for failing to cooperate. However, if he will just tell them what they want to know, he can go back to work.


This might be a career-best for director Irwin  Winkler. This Is obviously an in-house passion project for Robert DeNiro and his production company bringing in friends to help make and be in the movie (Martin Scorsese and Barry Primus) it offers Scorsese one of his very few acting roles.

The film dramatizes the Hollywood blacklist from a deeply personal level of the characters who were not only involved but destroyed by it and the different ways and levels the government was going after them. 

The destruction of the blacklist even though it was truly ultimately a witch hunt that didn’t truly amount to much except for the lives it destroyed and upped the standing of certain politicians. Maybe even allowed the government to punish the stars and studios for having more of a moral code.

The film comes across as an artifact, seeing so many well-known actors of today who play smaller supporting roles.

This ends up being like a ROCKY movie in the way the House of unAmerican Activities keeps stalking Deniro’s character and questioning any of his employers or anyone he associates with. So you anticipate once he finally is in front of the committee.

We see how it destroys his career and his friends around him. As they either are willing to betray, sell out, or drop out ultimately. For something many didn’t even take seriously in their past. Some even used it as leverage for revenge against others who they feel wronged them. 

The film is a drama that at times works more like a thriller. As it is just as chilling as it happened in real life. It’s scary and no physical weapons are used just hints and accusations. 

It hit home with me as with so many characters who thought Deniro’s character would be a team player. He cares more about movies particularly his than anything or anyone around him. Even though most people in his life seem to like him and be in the business. 

The FBI agents following him seem like the agents in THE MATRIX emotionless and remind the audience of Deniro’s roles in crime pictures as they seem to relentlessly stalk him just trying to find any little thing to nail him or put him away. It offers DeNiro one of his most affable roles. 

The character of Bert Alan, a producer played by Barry Primus seems out of place as he seems more like a 1980s mobster in 1950’s Hollywood.

Watching how an old female ingenue discovery goes from seduction to scared to disgusted. Before trying to finally bribe him to go away. Shows how powerful and scary the blacklist was in its heyday 

The film tries to be an epic on the subject from the point of view of a victim’s point of view but not An overview. 

This also brings one back to a time and place when movies looked like they might have been prestige but were also made due to the lead actor’s strength and popularity as an actor. Guaranteeing that there will be an audience for the film. Not so much based on popularity it metrics of money-making.

Really a power move trying to spank those who are more successful and who they feel have more influence. Feeling like they are putting them in their place and saving the American people from the influence of the powerful they actually believe to be anti-government. Like they wouldn’t be after being persecuted for nothing really. The betrayal of friends begging him to let them inform on him to save their own skins by naming someone.

In the end, it still leaves time for a powerful speech. This is my kind of history movie.

GRADE: B

THE LEGEND OF THE STARDUST BROTHERS (1985)

Written & Directed By: Makoto Teduka

Music written By: Haruo Chikada

Cinematography: Eiichi Osawa 

Editor: Mari Kishi and Makoto Teduka 

Cast: Shingo Kubota, Kazuhiro Takagi, Issay, Kyoko Togawa, Kiyohiko Ozaki, Kiyoshi Kurosawa 

In 1985, Makoto Tezuka, the son of manga genius Osamu Tezuka, was still a film student with a few experimental shorts to his credit and who was entrusted with the mission to turn an album by Haruo Chikada into a musical film.


Strange, inventive, surreal, and fun. There are no exact words to describe this film and do it justice. If you are a fan of movies like PHANTOM OF THE PARADISE, THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW and SHOCK TREATMENT. 

The story behind the film is just as wild and creative as the film. that a musician Haruo Chicada wrote an album full of songs, Essentially meant to be a soundtrack for a film that didn’t exist and that was the extent of the project until writer-director Makoto Tezka discovered it and decided to make a film based around it adapting it with a full storyline. 

So much talent In Front of and behind the scenes. As the director sought out musicians and artists of all kinds for the film. After all, this was his first full-length film. After just graduating from film school and making only experimental shorts. He considered himself a visualist more than just a director.

The result is a movie that plays like a series of music videos or montages built around the songs with a story connecting it all. So truly a musical at heart without so much choreography and show-stopping staging. though plenty of musical-themed montages when the main characters aren’t singing. 

Almost like a mean-spirited movie version of THE MONKEES TV show.  only not surrounding a band but a singing duo and focusing on the branding and corporate ownership of the two and being forced to sing the songs their Svengali manager gives them and him always watching. They also lose fame to rivals that come out of nowhere and then try to murder them. Competition between artists and even each other as a duo and want to be independent and try their own music 

The film’s soundtrack and visuals are its strength as the story is Minimal and never makes complete sense. As the film is all over the place. In a good way. Making it definitely crazy and unpredictable. 

The film has an Animated and even a horror sequence. This makes sense as it is partly anime-influenced or manga, especially towards the end the action sequences feel like live-action cartoons. The writer/director is also the son of Osamu Tezka an anime/Manga legend 

The film is definitely a product of its time and a shine as it is a cult film, that is little known In its homeland and the United States, with a soundtrack that is difficult to find 

It’s an epic odyssey that goes far but does so much with so little. Involving A story made up that only adds to the legend and might actually be true with The theme of wanting to make it on your own and realizing that you might need help To do it.

This Is a film whose wavelengths you are either going to get on or not. All of the music and songs are quite catchy. It seems to go through all cultures and fads of the time. 

It’s not perfect but such a unique, crazy, stylish, and silly journey that represents some things that it might not have intended to constantly invent and reinvent itself. As it is Reckless, dazzling unhinged, and creative. As it always has its heart on its sleeves and despite its surreal  nature bares it’s heart and spirit 

Grade: B+

CANDY CANE LANE (2023)

Directed By; Reginald Hudlin

Written By: Kelly Younger 

Cinematography: Newton Thomas Sigel

Editor: Kenny G. Krauss and Jim May

Cast: Eddie Murphy, Jillian Bell, Tracee Ellis Ross, Nick Offerman, Genneya Walton, Thaddeus J. Mixson, Ken Marino, Timothy Simons, Riki Lindhome, Trevante Rhodes, David Alan Grier, Robin Thede, Chris Redd, Danielle Pinnock, D.C. Young Fly, Catherine Dent, Stephen Tobolowsky, Penatonix, Anjelah Johnson-Reyes, Lombardo Boyer

A man is determined to win the neighborhood’s annual Christmas decorating contest. He makes a pact with an elf to help him win–and the elf casts a spell that brings the 12 days of Christmas to life, which brings unexpected chaos to town.


The film has a lot of goodwill, but it also has a bunch of familiar tropes. They are dressed up and try to feel fresh and for the most part, fit the season and set-up. 

The film tries to stay inventive but then falters under the weight of its own predictability and plays it way too safe and familiar.

The film isn’t necessarily good but it’s entertaining and keeps you invested. Even though star Eddie Murphy goes through the motions. He even has his moments to flex an original comedic lie here and there. Unfortunately for the most part it also feels like he is playing a role any actor or star could have played easily. That is how bland it is written. Though as always it is always in his strengths when his character is under pressure and his reactions can be priceless, Just not here

It does bring the audience back to when he was making more family films for better or worse. Though when they were just passing.

What works within this film is the spirit and the fact that his family in the film all get a chance to shine and be the hero throughout and come together when needed. Reminding the audience of the importance and need of family and enforcing the holiday spirit.

Though those looking for laughs might be hard-pressed to find any genuine comedy throughout.

Directed by Reginald Hudlin, it leaves you expecting more. Even though it does have a great production design. The less said of Santa Claus. Huggy bear ,velvet suit the better.

In the end, it’s a film that fits the holidays but isn’t the triumph you are hoping for when it comes to an Eddie Murphy film. 

Grade: C

FRYBREAD FACE AND ME (2023)

Written & Directed By: Billy Luther 

Cinematography: Peter Simonite

Editor: Fred Koschmann

Cast: Keir Tillman, Charley Hogan, Sarah H. Natani, Martin Sensmeier, Kahara Hodges, Morningstar Angeline, Leilani Taliaferro, Nasheen Sleuth, Jeremiah Bitsui 

Two adolescent Navajo cousins from different worlds bond during a summer herding sheep on their grandmother’s ranch in Arizona while learning more about their family’s past and themselves.


This film came out of nowhere. It’s heartwarming as can be and shows the importance of family and our ancestors. Especially when trying to uphold traditions that are slowly being forgotten and not used at all. 

It also shows the hardships of one family and how over one summer. There seems to be a passage of importance and forgiveness. Even those family members who you can’t stand or are annoying mean something and contribute to you and your future.

Be it advice or living lessons. Throughout you have characters who are lost and are trying to find themselves and some sort of meaning. Others have it figured out and need that opportunity or push in the right direction.

Every character in this film has a tale of what’s shown and spoken and so much that is not that that shapes them. The strongest impression is from the protagonist’s uncle. who is exaggerated in trying to be masculine and not measuring up to his older brother. While also feeling trapped to a certain extent. 

Kahara Hodges makes an impression as the wild aunt who ends up being the most caring next to the grandmother. She steals her scenes. Her character defies any kind of stereotype but is so heartfelt. 

This is a film that is much better and richer to watch and discover. Some will compare it to the show RESERVATION ROAD. It deals with indigenous people like that show. Not as modern or quirky, but shows Native American people in a different light. We still see their struggle but we also see their joy, livelihood, and traditions. The curation of culture unfortunately seems to be losing Its way. 

While it stays a coming-of-age film. It is an identifiable nostalgic story. That involves growing up to the world and those around you and appreciating them. It’s a personal story from writer-director Billy Luther

And one we should be honored that he told it and shared it. As the film has so much heart and hidden joys. It’s gritty but filled with warmth and love. 

Grade: B+

A THOUSAND AND ONE (2023)

Written & Directed By: A.V. Rockwell

Cinematography: Eric K. Yue

Editor: Sabine Hoffman And Kristan Sprague

Cast: Teyana Taylor, William Catlett, Aaron Kingsley Adetola, Aven Courtney, Josiah Cross, Alicia Pilgrim, Terri Abney, Delissa Reynolds, Amelia Workman, Adriane Lenox

After unapologetic and fiercely loyal Inez kidnaps her son Terry from the foster care system, mother and son set out to reclaim their sense of home, identity, and stability, in a rapidly changing New York City.


It’s truly a coming-of-age film for most of the characters, especially the mother and the son as we see various points of their life growing up and the hardships and sacrifices. They both must make, but the undeniable thing in everything is how much they love and care for each other.

Choreographer, rapper singer, and now actress Teyana Taylor gives a dynamite lead performance. This is one of the many strengths of the film it is mostly put up on her shoulders, and she knocks it out of the park with nuance and strength.

Even though what her character does is wrong legally she’s doing it for the right reasons and you can’t hate on her for that. No, you know sooner or later as even another character Towers, it’s going to catch up with her.

What is truly appreciated and remarkable about this film is that every detail matters because it has an effect on the rest of the film and the future of the characters.

The film for some might seem like another tale of poverty porn, but it also shows the strength of family and the resilience of spirit and character. When what you do is out of love, and the many hardships you might face, especially when mistakes might define you where you are never given a chance, or at least much of one. 

It also doesn’t fall into certain clichés like it shows him the sun trying to have a relationship, but kind of is over before I can even truly start it shows the oncoming gentrification of Harlem in the microaggressions in which the owners try to seem like they’re decent or trying to help you out, but really just trying to drive you out in so that they can get tenants they prefer will overpay 

It’s like watching a fight movie I wouldn’t say hard, because of all the horrors and challenges that other films with well in, and only be about this film faces, and sees its way through it, and dealing with it as just a factor of life. You can’t stay stuck on one thing.

I also admire that the film doesn’t present the characters as perfect, but they are good-hearted and decent for the most part. It doesn’t feed into the cliché of a black man not being a father. It shows him actually taking care of this child even though biologically, it’s not truly his, and while we can admire that aspect of him, even he admits he’s not perfect.

The film might be rough around the edges, but it never quite feels like it’s going off on a false note.

Grade: B

GENIE (2023)

Directed By: Sam Boyd

Written By: Richard Curtis

Cinematography: John Guleserian 

Editor: Heather Persons

Cast: Melissa McCarthy, Paapa Essiedu, Denee Benton, Jordyn McIntosh, LaChanze, Tate Ellington, Alan Cumming, Marc Maron, Luis Guzman, Ellen Cleghorne 

The film is a fairy-tale comedy about a workaholic man who enlists the help of a magical genie to help win his family back before Christmas.


This is your typical holiday fare, where yes it’s predictable and silly, but it’s also heartwarming and tries to remind you what is important about the holiday and life In general.

What makes this one a bit more intriguing is its cuteness and Melissa McCarthy. Who may as she didn’t originate this project. Isn’t all over the production, but also plays a charismatic and fun character. Rather than trying to create an iconic comedic character who is either sloppy, stupid or over the top. Here she is playing a comedic character, but one with heart and who resembles a character and not a bunch of jokes that are needed.

Ultimately the movie seems to be about wish fulfillment, but at the end of the day, it tries to show that friendship and family are what is the most important gifts you can have in life. 

Alan Cumming seems wasted in his very few scenes. It seemed like he was a big name to be put into the cast. 

The film is written by noted screenwriter Richard Curtis the man who wrote films such as LOVE ACTUALLY, FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL, and ABOUT TIME. This might be why the film is charming more the storytelling and not so much the visuals. 

Is it the best Christmas movie you will see? No, but it does make a nice addition during the holidays to watch regularly. It will help put a smile on your face. if not put you in a total holiday mood. 

Grade: C+ 

MEG 2: THE TRENCH (2023)

Directed By: Ben Wheatley 

Written By: Dean Georgaris, Joe Hoeber & Erich Hoeber

Based On The Novel “THE TRENCH” By: Steve Alten 

Cinematography: Harris Zambarloukos 

Editor: Jonathan Amos 

Cast: Jason Statham, Cliff Curtis, Page Kennedy, Sienna Guillory, Jing Wu, Sophia Cai, Skyler Samuels, Sergio Peris Menchata, Melissanthi Mahut, Whoopie Van Raam

When a shady corporation’s illegal mining operation disturbs the ocean’s mysterious seabed, veteran deep-sea rescue diver Jonas Taylor and a research team unearth terror beyond imagination. Five years after the horrific first encounter with the unstoppable Megalodon in The Meg, Jonas must now face a ferocious old enemy for the second time. But the sea’s perplexing depths harbor prehistoric, blood-chilling secrets aching to resurface. Can Jonas confront what emerges from the trench?


The title sounds like a crossover with AQUA-MAN that some might have hoped for or the French spin-off movie only connected to the Meg universe. No such luck 

This movie is truly a sequel with not only a bigger shark but three of them. While there is some humor in the film it’s not as strong or as fun as the first film.

It might be that in the first film, there were more recognizable actors in the first film. Where as here half the actors are new. The survivors from the first film are back for this film.

One of the problems might be that a sequel wasn’t really needed. Even with this film half of the script seems made up and offers nothing new except for the same old basic plot points of betrayal and underground criminals.

Another problem is that other than a hand-to-hand action sequence on a ship for Jason Statham to show off his fighting skills. There is no other action for the first hour practically. the second half makes up for it but mostly being action, but by then you have already lost certain members if the audience. Seemingly so you can set up plot points and try to make up science for what is happening. 

Then even though faxing the sharks is bad enough yet too much like the first film. You set up a mercenary force for them to fight and outwit. Which again allows Jason Statham some more hand-to-hand action.

Then you have the sharks and big lizards start attacking innocent citizens at a resort. So that it becomes a rescue disaster movie. As well as a JURASSIC PARK knockoff and allows the film to up the limited body count it has provided so far.  

Another problem is that the special effects are so obvious. That it is hard to get scared of something you know is pretty much animated.‘you take the fear out despite the bloody violence. It still feels more like a family film, more than anything.

The saving grace of the Movie actually is actor Page Kennedy. He seems to understand the ridiculous mood of the film and manages to make his l character stand out among the

Many a few of them also understand the nature of the film but do not manage to come away as memorable only serviceable.

The first hour might be the way it Is because of director Ben Wheatley who usually directs his own independent projects making his first studio film. As a challenge or for whatever reason. He wants to get the dramatics and set up first and let it build to the action massacre. It could also be a more for-hire job and not an original project that he started. The passion might be missing 

It might be that the film is based on a novel. So the need to explain the science and technical aspects must come first. Before we can truly enjoy the senseless action that feels repetitive and never as exciting as the filmmakers are trying for. Which also amounts to a lot of exposition. 

The film was also made to appeal to a more global market. As it has quite an international cast. Which unfortunately makes it seem more like a byproduct than even an actual product. 

Grade: D+

VACATION FRIENDS 2 (2023)

Written & Directed By: Clay Tarver
Based on characters created by: Clay Tarver, Tom Mullen & Tim Mullen, Jonathan Goldstein & John Francis Daley Cinematography: Tim Suhrstedt
Editor: Tim Roche 

Cast: Lil’ Rel Howery, Yvonne Orji, John Cena, Meredith Hagner, Steve Buscemi, Carlos Santos, Ronny Chieng, Jamie Hector 

A couple who meets up with another couple while on vacation in Mexico sees their friendship take an awkward turn when they get back home.


Let me start off by saying that I surprisingly enjoyed the first film. It was better than I thought it would be. So it’s with a heavy heart that I say. I really didn’t like this one.

As it is a sequel that didn’t need to be made for any reason. The story just feels put together without any real meaning or reason. As it tries to repeat the first film.

Only in the first film, John Cena and Meredith Hagner’s characters were annoying and over the top, but eventually, it was explained why they were. It also showed that underneath they were sweethearts who really cared about their friends.

In this film, they are still annoying and it seems just to be annoying or the script requires them to be without showing any real growth at all. (Especially Hagner) They also seem a bit more cruel at times in their Jokes, particularly in the airport scenes. So that they feel unlikeable because they are truly given so little to do.

Their subplot with Steve Buscemi’s character seems so non-engaging. Even though Buscemi tries, the script lets him down at most turns.

Lil’ Rel Howery and Yvonne Orji also have nothing better to do than tag along for the ride. As they are used to them lil’ Rel seems to be the character who gets into the most trouble trying to juggle rest & relaxation with friends and an important business deal. As well as being the constant naysayer when it comes to any kind of wayward activity. Ending up doing it and being the most punished. 

The hijinks this time also feel a little more take and uninventive than the first films. This film isn’t as shocking or as heartfelt. 

It’s surprising that this failed so badly. as the film is directed by the original director who showed promise with the first film. though then again even though he helped co-write the original. Here he is on his own and it shows as the magic seems to be missing.

  It just seems like everyone here is contractually obligated and had so much fun in the first film. Let’s do it again and do it in a tropical paradise. It feels like THE HANGOVER PART 2 all over again only on a smaller streaming scale and trying not to repress the same jokes 

Grade: D 

MY BIG FAT GREEK WEDDING 2 (2016)

Directed By: Kirk Jones

Written By: Nia Vardalos

Cinematography: Jim Denault

Editor: Mark Czyzewski

Cast: Nia Vardalos, John Corbett, Michael Constantine, Lainie Kazan, Andrea Martin, Elena Kampouris, Gia Carides, Louis Mandylor, Alex Wolff, Joey Fatone, Bess Meisler, Rita Wilson, John Stamos, Rob Riggle, Mark Margolis, Ian Gomez, Bruce Gray, Jayne Eastwood

Still working in her parents’ Greek restaurant, Toula Portokalos’ daughter, Paris, is growing up. She is getting ready to graduate high school and Toula and Ian are experiencing marital issues. When Toula’s parents find out they were never officially married, another wedding is in the works. Can this big, fat, Greek event help to bring the family together?


It could be the fact that before this film a few year earlier Nia Vardalos tried to turn this into a franchise with a follow up television series 

Considering they tried s sitcom after the first film this feels like they just took story threads or ideas from there and tried to make a movie with a framing device and theme

As this film feels all over the place, like it want the audience to be updated on the families notice after all these years with her other film Connie and Carla not doing well wanted a guaranteed hit

It’s a feel good film with no real stakes. so while it’s nice to see the characters again they are left with little to nothing to really do as we just enjoy and laugh at their antics

The fil m can be considered fun for those who l led the original

Though the first film was better content wise as it had a love story and a story of self Confidence. That was familiar and well structured and could be identifiable by mining a culture under represented and giving them representation even with it’s stereotypes that come off as loving

It might have been seen as a clash in as the audience for the first film has come of age and are dealing with their teenage children and the prospect of them leaving the nest. So again a bit updated and identifiable for that generation 

The problem is as familiar as the first film was; this one jsit feels generic. A script that tries to have a best of or greatest hits quality to it’s scenes the first film the characters came off as quirky here they come off more as caricatures of their former selves playing it more for laughs. 

You could say that this feels like a victory lap. While it keeps it’s innocence and a little charm. That keeps it safe 

Grade: C